Researchers Cast Doubt on Viability of Tesla's Electric Big Rig

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

It’s not just the range — it’s the weight, too. Oh, and don’t forget about cost. These are some of the potential stumbling blocks facing Tesla’s introduction of an electric semi truck, say Carnegie Mellon University researchers in a peer-reviewed study expected later this month.

Tesla has two trucks up its sleeve. One, an electric big rig, is slated for reveal this September, while an electric pickup should appear within the next two years. So far, it’s looking like the latter vehicle is the viable one.

The study, to be published in the American Chemical Society’s ACS Energy Letters, was previewed by Wired. In it, the researchers call into question just how practical an electric, long-haul 18-wheeler can be.

“The challenge is on par in difficulty level with electric airplanes,” said Venkat Viswanathan, who crafted the study with colleague Shashank Sripad.

There isn’t much known about the looming big rig, except that it will use the same motors as the upcoming Model 3 sedan. Based on this information, and using the current Tesla standard of a battery pack generating 243 watt-hours per kilogram, the researchers examined all of the factors affecting transport trucks: anticipated load, distance traveled, aerodynamic drag, etc.

A typical semi covers between 300 and 600 miles a day. To cover 600 miles without charging, the truck would need a 14-ton battery, the study claims. Boost the range to 900 miles, and the battery would tip the scales at 22 tons. While battery prices are trending downwards, current prices state the packs would carry a price tag of $290,000 to $450,000 alone, minus the cost of the overall vehicle. Compare that to the price of a regular diesel semi — roughly $120,000.

Because federal laws limit a truck’s gross weight to 40 tons, a Tesla big rig configured in such a manner would likely only be able to haul 9 tons of cargo — far less than the average payload of 16 tons. When you add to that the inflated price, you’re left wondering what shipping company would pay for such a vehicle. Yes, electric vehicles are touted as having lower ownership and maintenance costs, but such a truck would have to be on the road for a very long time before making up the difference. As well, there’s the issue of recharging times.

“Our paper suggests that using a bigger battery pack to achieve longer range maximum payload is unfeasible, given the energy density of current lithium-ion batteries,” Viswanathan says. “Three hundred to 350 miles is probably what the vehicle could be designed for. Beyond that, the battery would be both very heavy and very expensive.”

Advancements in battery technology will ultimately breed lighter packs with greater range, but the great leap forward in stored energy hasn’t yet occurred. At least, not on a mass-produced basis. The study’s authors anticipate a “beyond lithium-ion battery pack” will one day make an electric semi capable of hauling a full load the desired distance.

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 73 comments
  • WheelMcCoy WheelMcCoy on Jun 03, 2017

    "The Earth is not fragile and it can take whatever we lowly humans can throw at it. " I agree the Earth, mother nature, and father time, will endure. The question is can humans take what we throw at ourselves? Costal cities will be flooded. Droughts will make food harder to grow. Southern peaches are the latest casualty this year. Migration of mosquitos can move northward, bringing Zika. You seem old school enough to appreciate the saying "an ounce of prevention... ", so let's try it.

  • Modelt1918 Modelt1918 on Jun 04, 2017

    As a truck driver for over 41 years, I just laughed at the absurd comments made about truck driving. Most of you and especially Kato, has no clue how American trucking works.

    • See 1 previous
    • HotPotato HotPotato on Jun 04, 2017

      @modemjunki Remember WalMart's futuristic 18-wheeler development exercise? The resulting one-off truck struck me as so similar to the Nikola concept that I wondered if they had just rebranded it as their own.

  • Varezhka Maybe the volume was not big enough to really matter anyways, but losing a “passenger car” for a mostly “light truck” line-up should help Subaru with their CAFE numbers too.
  • Varezhka For this category my car of choice would be the CX-50. But between the two cars listed I’d select the RAV4 over CR-V. I’ve always preferred NA over small turbos and for hybrids THS’ longer history shows in its refinement.
  • AZFelix I would suggest a variation on the 'fcuk, marry, kill' game using 'track, buy, lease' with three similar automotive selections.
  • Formula m For the gas versions I like the Honda CRV. Haven’t driven the hybrids yet.
  • SCE to AUX All that lift makes for an easy rollover of your $70k truck.
Next