How Did Ford Motor Company Outsell General Motors In May 2017?

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

With its Ford and Lincoln brands, the Ford Motor Company reported 240,250 U.S. sales in May 2017, a 2-percent year-over-year improvement.

General Motors, which has outsold Ford Motor Company in 14 consecutive months, sold 237,364 new vehicles in May 2017, a 1-percent year-over-year drop.

In May 2017, for the first time since March of last year, the Ford Motor Company outsold General Motors.

The Mark Fields era at Ford, a period in which the company’s value crumbled, is over. But if Fields took the blame for what ailed Ford, doesn’t he get the credit for what went right? Besides a handsome severance package, the Mark Fields era ended with Ford Motor Company out in front of General Motors.

But how did Ford make it happen? With pickups and fleets.

PICKUP


Despite a 2-percent uptick in overall light truck volume overall, GM’s pickup truck volume declined 5 percent, year-over-year, in May 2017. This GM pickup truck decline occurred in a truck category that, GM excluded, jumped 17 percent in May, a gain of nearly 24,000 total sales for Ford, Toyota, Nissan, and Honda.

In other words, pickups are hot. GM’s pickups, increasingly de-incentivized, are not.

Meanwhile at Ford, F-Series sales jumped 13 percent last month, continuing a trend of improvement from the earlier part of the year that suggests Ford will sell nearly 900,000 pickup trucks this year — a 12 or 13-year high for the F-Series range.

Though demanding more from paying customers — Ford says average F-Series transaction prices rose $3,300 last month — May’s 76,027-unit F-Series performance was still best May for the truck lineup since 2004. Ford’s share of the full-size truck market jumped more than a point to 39 percent.

Ford wasn’t the only automaker to pick up pickup sales at GM’s expense. May was the third consecutive month in which the Ram P/U line, up 16 percent last month, outsold the Chevrolet Silverado.

FLEET


While the F-Series accounted for nearly one-third of total Ford Motor Company U.S. sales in May, trucks aren’t the whole ball game. Ford/Lincoln passenger car sales were down 10 percent last month, a drastic drop to be sure, but nothing like the 22-percent rate of decline experienced by the ten car nameplates through the first one-third of the year.

Ford division SUVs/crossovers, meanwhile, reported a collective 3-percent gain in May. Those five utility vehicles outsold Ford’s own car division by more than 21,000 units.

Regardless of the nameplate — SUV, crossover, and car or typically fleet-friendly truck or van — Ford required a significant boost in fleet volume in order to outsell General Motors and earn 16 percent of the market in May. 34 percent of Ford Motor Company May 2017 sales were fleet-derived.

Retail sales at Ford Motor Company slid 1 percent. Retail sales at General Motors — 21 percent stronger than Ford’s retail volume — ticked up slightly.

Of course, not all fleet is bad. Indeed, a good fleet sale is much better than a bad retail sale. And so long as Ford is dominating core fleet segments with commercial vans and pickup trucks, we’ll always see large fleet volume from the automaker.

Ford says 16 percent of the company’s total May volume was produced by sales to daily rental companies, another 12 percent went to commercial fleets, and 6 percent of May’s volume were generated by sales to government fleets.

That boost certainly helped Ford decrease its inventory glut to much more tolerable levels. At the end of April, Ford had 83 days’ supply, including vehicles in transit. That was down to 72 days by the end of May, less supply than Ford had at this stage of 2016 when the market was climbing. And so it should be.

According to ALG, Ford Motor Company and General Motors average transaction prices were essentially on par with another. Incentives at Ford Motor Company rose 14 percent year-over-year to $4,090, ALG says, though that was down marginally from April levels. At General Motors, incentives grew 5 percent to $4,255 compared with May of last year and were up narrowly compared with April.

Timothy Cain is a contributing analyst at The Truth About Cars and Autofocus.ca and the founder and former editor of GoodCarBadCar.net. Follow on Twitter @timcaincars.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 30 comments
  • Akear Akear on Jun 03, 2017

    The era of cut-and-run Bara the only place for GM to go is downward. On the other hand, Fields has built up Ford in both Europe the US. The mustang is now the bestselling American car in Europe. Imagine the Germans on waiting lists to buy American mustangs! Bara strategy was to instead to leave Europe, giving the impression GM could not compete there. It is strange that Bara was been awarded for her incompetence, while Fields was fired just two days before it was announced Ford had surpassed GM in domestic market share. It has been estimated that GM lost about 3% market share by cancelling, Pontiac, Oldsmobile, Hummer, and Saturn. With those divisions still intact GM would have a market share of around 19-20% today. Bara states she wants GM to concentrate of profitability instead of chasing market share. It has done little good, since GM stock price is still trash (33 USD). You will also be surprised how little interest GM stock holders have in the actual quality of GM cars. Fast Fact. The cancelled divisions of old GM which include, Oldsmobile, Saturn, Pontiac, and Hummer could create a single division that would outsell all of Mitsubishi, Lincoln, and Mazda combined! We are probably talking about a combined sales volume of 250,000+ cars. Bara will be fired once GM's stock drops to around 26 USD. As I said before with GM's current strategy the only place to go is downward. Ford will win a few more months in the market share race and take over permanently in the early 2020s.

    • HotPotato HotPotato on Jun 04, 2017

      Meh. Little growth and less profit to be had in the European market. GM is focusing on China; that's where the growth potential is. Seems pretty smart to me.

  • Sjalabais Sjalabais on Jun 04, 2017

    That picture above, new GM pickups being delivered on an ancient Volvo/White truck - that machine myst be 20 years old at the least. How long do US commercial trucks do service? In Europe, it's rare to see 20 yo trucks do that kind of duty, especially if hired for a vehicle manufacturer.

    • See 2 previous
    • Scoutdude Scoutdude on Jun 04, 2017

      @Sjalabais Passenger trains are pretty uncommon in the US other than the few cities that have commuter "light rail". Freight on the other hand is what keeps them alive. A friend of my son, who has sort of adopted my wife and I as his second set of parents works as what I call a can smasher for BNSF. His job is taking the shipping containers off of the trains and putting them on trailers and vice versa. It is a big yard with a number of employees working two or three shifts a day. There is a near constant flow of trucks in and out most of the year. It really peaks in the months before Thanksgiving with all of the consumer goods from China heading to distribution centers across the US. Then there is another peak between Thanksgiving and Christmas as they ship containers of packages for UPS and all those empty cans making their way back to China. The picture you are referencing was almost certainly taken in one of those rail yard. Two of them in my are are located right next to a major freeway so when I've go by there in the mornings you'll see a line of trucks that were loaded overnight waiting for their drivers to take the cars to the dealers.

  • Jkross22 When I think about products that I buy that are of the highest quality or are of great value, I have no idea if they are made as a whole or in parts by unionized employees. As a customer, that's really all I care about. When I think about services I receive from unionized and non-unionized employees, it varies from C- to F levels of service. Will unionizing make the cars better or worse?
  • Namesakeone I think it's the age old conundrum: Every company (or industry) wants every other one to pay its workers well; well-paid workers make great customers. But nobody wants to pay their own workers well; that would eat into profits. So instead of what Henry Ford (the first) did over a century ago, we will have a lot of companies copying Nike in the 1980s: third-world employees (with a few highly-paid celebrity athlete endorsers) selling overpriced products to upper-middle-class Americans (with a few urban street youths willing to literally kill for that product), until there are no more upper-middle-class Americans left.
  • ToolGuy I was challenged by Tim's incisive opinion, but thankfully Jeff's multiple vanilla truisms have set me straight. Or something. 😉
  • ChristianWimmer The body kit modifications ruined it for me.
  • ToolGuy "I have my stance -- I won't prejudice the commentariat by sharing it."• Like Tim, I have my opinion and it is perfect and above reproach (as long as I keep it to myself). I would hate to share it with the world and risk having someone critique it. LOL.
Next