Ford to Fling Driveshaft Repairs at Transit Owners Until It Figures Out a Solution

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

There’s a problem underneath 2015-2017 Ford Transit models and, until the Blue Oval figures out a long-term fix, owners and operators of all Transit variants can expect a new driveshaft flexible coupling every 30,000 miles.

The automaker has announced a safety recall for 402,462 Transits sold in North America in order to prevent instances of driveshaft separation caused by a faulty flexible coupling. Ford seems to have become aware of a looming problem with each vehicle’s driveline, which apparently isn’t nearly as robust as the automaker had hoped.

Ford claims it isn’t aware of any accidents or injuries stemming from driveshaft separation. However, it wouldn’t know of the problem if it hadn’t already happened. While the vehicles involved in the recall aren’t old, potential failure of the flexible coupling might not be far off for many of them.

“Based on the field data, Ford does not expect the current flexible couplings to deteriorate sufficiently to result in driveline separation in vehicles with less than 30,000 mile,” the automaker said in a statement.

It describes the risk potential as such:

In the affected vehicles, continuing to operate a vehicle with a cracked flexible coupling may cause separation of the driveshaft, resulting in a loss of motive power while driving or unintended vehicle movement in park without the parking brake applied. In addition, separation of the driveshaft from the transmission can result in secondary damage to surrounding components, including brake and fuel lines. A driveshaft separation may increase the risk of injury or crash.

As a permanent fix isn’t yet available, Ford has issued owners a game plan. If your Transit has less than 30,000 miles on it, simply wait until it reaches that point, after which a Ford dealer will happily install a new flexible coupling free of charge. Should your Transit already have a recently replaced driveshaft or flexible coupling, wait until the components rack up 30,000 miles.

As for owners of Transit with more than 30,000 miles on the odometer, get thee to a Ford dealer for a replacement immediately. The automaker claims “the interim repair will consist of replacing the driveshaft flexible coupling every 30,000 miles until the final repair is available and completed.”

A Securities and Exchange Commission filing uncovered by USA Today shows the recall will set Ford back a cool $142 million. That’s certainly the last thing the automaker needs. Ford has blamed a series of recalls for a steep drop in first-quarter 2017 earnings.

Of the recalled vehicles, 370,630 were sold in the U.S. and 26,254 were shipped to Canada. Another 2,361 Transits found their way to federalized territories, with 3,217 shipped to Mexico. The issue affects medium, long, and extended wheelbases of Transit vans and buses, as well as medium-wheelbase chassis cabs and cutaways.

Soon, Ford must choose between two permanent solutions. The automaker claims it could install “either a redesigned flexible coupling with a modified driveshaft bracket and shield or a revised driveshaft equipped with a universal joint.”

[Image: Ford Motor Company]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 37 comments
  • TR4 TR4 on Jun 30, 2017

    If the propeller shaft can't take the torque from Americans' bigger engines/automatic transmissions I wonder about the rear axle.

  • Big Al from Oz Big Al from Oz on Jun 30, 2017

    cramerica and Adam and others, Read; "In addition, separation of the driveshaft from the transmission can result in secondary damage to surrounding components, including brake and fuel lines. A driveshaft separation may increase the risk of injury or crash." The affected Fort Transit vehicles were build in the USA assembly plant from Jan 2014 to Jun 2017. For vehicles affected with more than 30,000 miles on the clock an interim repair will be undertaken.

  • MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
  • MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh [h3]Wake me up when it is a 1989 635Csi with a M88/3[/h3]
  • BrandX "I can charge using the 240V outlets, sure, but it’s slow."No it's not. That's what all home chargers use - 240V.
  • Jalop1991 does the odometer represent itself in an analog fashion? Will the numbers roll slowly and stop wherever, or do they just blink to the next number like any old boring modern car?
Next