A Curious Trim Level for New 2017 Mazda CX-5: Grand Select

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

Sitting just $500 below the top-spec 2017 Mazda CX-5 Grand Touring is a new Grand Select trim.

Mazda spokesperson Jacob Brown tells CarsDirect, which spotted the addition, that the 2017 CX-5 Grand Select is an attempt by Mazda USA to examine consumer tastes.

Grand Select, Brown says, “will be offered for a limited time and will test the waters for customer options preferences in the marketplace.”

Like the CX-5 Grand Touring, the $29,835 Grand Select is a very well-equipped, premium-aping compact crossover. Unlike the CX-5 Grand Touring, the Grand Select lacks forward collision warning, adaptive cruise, auto high beams, lane departure warning, and lane keeping assist. A few years down the increasingly autonomous road, those are the kinds of features that might be a real boon to resale.

Sure you wanna save $500?

The CX-5 Grand Select sneaks in under the $30K marker but still includes some advanced safety tech: blind spot monitoring and cross-traffic alert, for example. And because the Grand Select is essentially a CX-5 Grand Touring without a few enhanced safety features, there are still 19-inch wheels, leather seating, Bose audio, power driver’s seat, and a sunroof.

Although it’s increasingly normal for auto writers to hop in and out of vehicles with steering wheels that turn by themselves, cars that periodically brake whether you want them to or not, and cruise control that slows behind dawdling traffic, consumers who haven’t driven a new car since they bought their first CX-5 in 2012 can be in for quite a shock.

With the 2017 CX-5 Grand Select, Mazda will be able to determine whether some of the consumers who want luxury content would rather not encounter any form of autonomous driving.

If Mazda is going to perform such a test, the CX-5 is the volume vehicle with which to do so.

Although Mazda’s company-wide volume remains unimpressive in the United States, the CX-5 is on track for its best year ever in 2017, continuing an unending growth streak for what is now the most popular Mazda. The current pace pegs U.S. CX-5 sales at 125,000 units in 2017, a 57-percent jump compared with 2013, the nameplate’s first full year. On a monthly basis, CX-5 sales have grown, year-over-year, in 43 of the last 52 months. 40 percent of the Mazdas sold in the United States in the first five months of 2017 were CX-5s.

As for other CX-5s, the basic 2017 CX-5 Sport starts at $24,985, including a $940 destination fee. The mid-grade Touring is $26,855. The Grand Touring is $30,335. All-wheel drive is a $1,300 option at each level. There are no manual transmissions.

[Image: Mazda]

Timothy Cain is a contributing analyst at The Truth About Cars and Autofocus.ca and the founder and former editor of GoodCarBadCar.net. Follow on Twitter @timcaincars.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 18 comments
  • Meat Meat on Jun 17, 2017

    I'm willing to bet that the discounted insurance premiums of the Grand Touring with the full package of aids and safety features will more than make up for the extra $500 over the course of a few years.

    • Stevelovescars Stevelovescars on Jun 18, 2017

      Really? I've never even heard of insurance companies asking if one has those features. Does it cost less to insure a Grand Touring example vs a base Sport? Personally, I'd prefer the nicer interior trim and sunroof without the ride-killing larger wheels and tires.

  • Meat Meat on Jun 18, 2017

    My insurance offers discounts for features like ABS, blind spot monitoring, back up cameras, and I'd presume others like lane holding and automatic braking. I was asked about those at the time of enrollment but I don't have those on my vehicles so I don't see that discount on my bill. At the very least I'd expect insurers to assess risk and resulting premiums not just on make and model but also trim level. One can reasonably hypothesize that buyer's of higher trim levels with more safety tech will make fewer claims. As it is, drivers of cheaper vehicles tend to be involved with more collisions than those driving newer and more expensive vehicles. Regarding the savings - if the average modern car buyer is financing for 60 months the insurance premium savings need only be $8/month to make up that additional expenditure on the higher trim level.

  • Theflyersfan OK, I'm going to stretch the words "positive change" to the breaking point here, but there might be some positive change going on with the beaver grille here. This picture was at Car and Driver. You'll notice that the grille now dives into a larger lower air intake instead of really standing out in a sea of plastic. In darker colors like this blue, it somewhat conceals the absolute obscene amount of real estate this unneeded monstrosity of a failed styling attempt takes up. The Euro front plate might be hiding some sins as well. You be the judge.
  • Theflyersfan I know given the body style they'll sell dozens, but for those of us who grew up wanting a nice Prelude Si with 4WS but our student budgets said no way, it'd be interesting to see if Honda can persuade GenX-ers to open their wallets for one. Civic Type-R powertrain in a coupe body style? Mild hybrid if they have to? The holy grail will still be if Honda gives the ultimate middle finger towards all things EV and hybrid, hides a few engineers in the basement away from spy cameras and leaks, comes up with a limited run of 9,000 rpm engines and gives us the last gasp of the S2000 once again. A send off to remind us of when once they screamed before everything sounds like a whirring appliance.
  • Jeff Nice concept car. One can only dream.
  • Funky D The problem is not exclusively the cost of the vehicle. The problem is that there are too few use cases for BEVs that couldn't be done by a plug-in hybrid, with the latter having the ability to do long-range trips without requiring lengthy recharging and being better able to function in really cold climates.In our particular case, a plug-in hybrid would run in all electric mode for the vast majority of the miles we would drive on a regular basis. It would also charge faster and the battery replacement should be less expensive than its BEV counterpart.So the answer for me is a polite, but firm NO.
  • 3SpeedAutomatic 2012 Ford Escape V6 FWD at 147k miles:Just went thru a heavy maintenance cycle: full brake job with rotors and drums, replace top & bottom radiator hoses, radiator flush, transmission flush, replace valve cover gaskets (still leaks oil, but not as bad as before), & fan belt. Also, #4 fuel injector locked up. About $4.5k spread over 19 months. Sole means of transportation, so don't mind spending the money for reliability. Was going to replace prior to the above maintenance cycle, but COVID screwed up the market ( $4k markup over sticker including $400 for nitrogen in the tires), so bit the bullet. Now serious about replacing, but waiting for used and/or new car prices to fall a bit more. Have my eye on a particular SUV. Last I checked, had a $2.5k discount with great interest rate (better than my CU) for financing. Will keep on driving Escape as long as A/C works. đźš—đźš—đźš—
Next