2017 BMW X5 XDrive35i Review - Luxury Mid-size Crisis

Jeff Wilson
by Jeff Wilson

High performance sport utilities are nothing new. Porsche’s Cayenne has been around for a while (15 years, in fact), and for the most part the diehard Zuffenhausen aficionados have at least accepted, if not embraced it. Jeep continues to make its ridiculous SRT variation of the Grand Cherokee, which has the ability to consume fuel and tires at an equally distressing rate. GMC is to blame for starting this foolishness in the early ‘90s with the Typhoon version of its otherwise lamentable S15 Jimmy.

BMW isn’t immune to the desire for a padded bottom line and has provided buyers with several variations of the South Carolina-built X5 mid-size SUV for 18 years now too, including M-branded versions with their own eyebrow-raising performance.

So while comparably priced and dynamically superior 5 Series wagons languished in showrooms, North American drivers climbed over themselves to grab a trendy SUV instead.

Giving credit where it’s due, BMW has always done a great job with the X5, imbuing it with handling capabilities and performance pretty close to that of most proper sport wagons, as well as increased ground clearance to safely conquer slightly deeper snow. (Don’t bother asking about off-road capability, it’s not the point of this machine.)

Now four years into its lifecycle, the latest version of the X5 continues to impress.

It’s been a few years since I drove the X5 when I signed out our test machine from BMW Canada’s media fleet, and my recollection was a very positive one. I remembered being thoroughly impressed by the X5’s on-road capabilities and sublime front-seat comfort, causing me to forgive the fact that it’s actually an SUV and not one of the sport wagons the Europeans do so well.

But time waits for no man (or machine) and the competition continues to march forward, bringing out new offerings, technology, and performance. The Range Rover Sport’s presence and off-road capability, and the Mercedes-Benz GLE 450 with its lusty engine and updated infotainment system, made me all but forget about the X5.

Climbing into this X5, it didn’t take long to remember why BMW’s mid-size ‘ute I was so endearing to it, or the droves of North American buyers who continue to make the model one of the marque’s most popular sellers. The seats — BMW’s Comfort Seats — are nothing short than an ass-coddling triumph. With the backrest being divided into upper and lower hemispheres, it’s possible to find a comfortable seating position no matter how poor your posture. The upper and lower portions of the seat are also adaptable for width, enabling drivers of all carriages — from engorged to emaciated — to find contentment.

The dash layout is unlikely to win any artistic design awards, but it’s functional and will be familiar to anyone who has spent any time in pretty well any BMW from the last dozen years or so. The latest generation M Sport steering wheel feels great in-hand, with its chunky rim, paddle shifters and thin spokes featuring a reasonable number of redundant buttons.

BMW’s iDrive — once the subject of disdain and ridicule — has evolved into what could arguably be the industry standard. Its layout and operation is intuitive, and its control — with both touchscreen and dial — is excellent. Plus, the wireless Apple CarPlay integration makes the celebrated interface even easier to use.

The standard Harman Kardon sound system provides solid audio performance with full, rich sound, which makes me wonder if most human ears can fully appreciate the available 1,200-watt, 16-speaker Bang & Olufsen system.

And both the rear seat (with its useful 40-20-40 split) and cargo hold offer competitive space for a mid-size SUV. A third row of seats is optional, but not fitted to our test machine.

Plus, this particular rig was optioned up to look like a seriously sporting ute, what with its M Sport Package (including adaptive suspension), M Power Kit, and ridiculously impractical carbon fiber bits from the front splitter to the side mirrors and back to the rear diffuser. The M Performance exhaust means it even sounds ferocious.

The trouble is 320 horsepower (the M Power Kit gives it a 20 hp boost over the standard fare) feels good, but not scintillating in a rig that weighs in at nearly 4,800 lbs, and with all those M’s on the spec sheet, it kind of seems like it should do 0-60 quicker than the claimed 6 seconds.

Of course, the TwinPower turbocharged inline six-cylinder engine powering this X5, is the base model engine. There’s a diesel with 413 lb-ft of torque, a 445 hp V8 and the obscene 567 hp X5 M, if more grunt is desired — and it should be for a performance machine. I say skip some of the frivolous style options and go for the V8 to really make the X5 feel special.

The transmission at least — that venerable 8-speed ZF automatic — is excellent. Shifts are almost imperceptible when just cruising along, but blazingly quick when Sport mode is selected or the paddles are used.

While the grunt of the V8 models would be welcome, it does come with a few hundred pounds of extra heft, mostly over the front end, which may diminish handling a bit. But even with our six-cylinder version and the suspension set to its firmest settings, it’s hard to forget this is still a tall, utility vehicle when pressed into corners. There’s considerable body roll. The steering lacks feel and feedback. Some of the sharpness might be lost in our tester’s squishy Pirelli Scorpion winter tires.

Despite grumbling about squirmy tires and a roly-poly nature, the BMW nevertheless is a capable handler, tackling corners and on-ramps without losing composure. And it should also be said that it still slots somewhere between a Cayenne’s performance and that of a Lexus RX at the softer end.

In the auto industry, four years is a long time. As some of its competitors are younger, they feel more spry and modern than the X5. That said, BMW’s mid-size SUV remains a solid-feeling and luxurious machine. Its cabin technology and active safety features are all as current-feeling as any of its competitors, but then at over $80,000 USD (or over $90,000 in Canada), it darn-well better be.

The folks in Greer, South Carolina continue to build a good mid-size luxury SUV for BMW, but the competition is fierce and chasing profits in a sporty sport utility vehicle will only get more difficult with age.

Correction: As stated by one of the commenters below, it’s the GMC Typhoon and not the Syclone that provided drivers a high-po SUV in the ’90s. We’ve updated the article to reflect this.

[Images: © 2017 Jeff Wilson]








Jeff Wilson
Jeff Wilson

More by Jeff Wilson

Comments
Join the conversation
10 of 45 comments
  • Stingray65 Stingray65 on Jun 02, 2017

    My how spoiled we have become when 6 seconds to 60 is considered a bit slow.

    • See 7 previous
    • Speedlaw Speedlaw on Jun 11, 2017

      @Jeff Wilson no matter. most stoplight drags today are cellphone modulated anyway

  • KM1959 KM1959 on Jun 14, 2017

    My wife took a Cayenne Turbo for a test drive while waiting for me to return from mine in a 911 Turbo S. That smile on her face told me that my Yukon would be gone soon. But at $130K-ish that just wasn't going to happen. After trying the Maserati Levante which sounded fantastic but was kinda useless with cargo and passengers we went to BMW. She went straight to the Xdrive50i (pretty sure that's it - who names these things?) and bought it on the spot. This 445 HP V8 will pin you in the seat wheen passing on the freeway - seriously! And what a sleeper too. My wife loves to nail it at stoplights, "Sport mode, on" whenever she gets the chance. It takes the mind numbing monotony out of SUV driving. Oh, and it's very comfortable as well. You HAVE to getthe V8 though!

  • Arthur Dailey We have a lease coming due in October and no intention of buying the vehicle when the lease is up.Trying to decide on a replacement vehicle our preferences are the Maverick, Subaru Forester and Mazda CX-5 or CX-30.Unfortunately both the Maverick and Subaru are thin on the ground. Would prefer a Maverick with the hybrid, but the wife has 2 'must haves' those being heated seats and blind spot monitoring. That requires a factory order on the Maverick bringing Canadian price in the mid $40k range, and a delivery time of TBD. For the Subaru it looks like we would have to go up 2 trim levels to get those and that also puts it into the mid $40k range.Therefore are contemplating take another 2 or 3 year lease. Hoping that vehicle supply and prices stabilize and purchasing a hybrid or electric when that lease expires. By then we will both be retired, so that vehicle could be a 'forever car'. Any recommendations would be welcomed.
  • Eric Wait! They're moving? Mexico??!!
  • GrumpyOldMan All modern road vehicles have tachometers in RPM X 1000. I've often wondered if that is a nanny-state regulation to prevent drivers from confusing it with the speedometer. If so, the Ford retro gauges would appear to be illegal.
  • Theflyersfan Matthew...read my mind. Those old Probe digital gauges were the best 80s digital gauges out there! (Maybe the first C4 Corvettes would match it...and then the strange Subaru XT ones - OK, the 80s had some interesting digital clusters!) I understand the "why simulate real gauges instead of installing real ones?" argument and it makes sense. On the other hand, with the total onslaught of driver's aid and information now, these screens make sense as all of that info isn't crammed into a small digital cluster between the speedo and tach. If only automakers found a way to get over the fallen over Monolith stuck on the dash design motif. Ultra low effort there guys. And I would have loved to have seen a retro-Mustang, especially Fox body, have an engine that could rev out to 8,000 rpms! You'd likely be picking out metal fragments from pretty much everywhere all weekend long.
  • Analoggrotto What the hell kind of news is this?
Next