Stagnating Sales Leads GM to Warn of Layoffs at Michigan SUV Plant

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Automakers are seeing diminished interest in product as market demand levels off after years of post-recession growth. While some analysts are heralding an industry-wide doomsday, others have cited this as an inevitable market ebb with no cause for alarm. Either way, domestic and foreign automakers have begun scaling back production efforts.

In the United States, Ford recently announced layoffs at its Ohio truck plant and General Motors may be following suit by eliminating 1,100 employees at the Delta Township Assembly Plant near Lansing, Michigan.

GM’s newest U.S. factory was already scheduled undergo retooling for the 2018 Chevrolet Traverse and Buick Enclave crossovers. However, when the plant reopens this June, there’s a good chance that third-shift employees won’t be returning.

According to The Detroit Bureau, General Motors issued an official warning to 1,100 workers about potential layoffs —confirming earlier claims that job cuts were forthcoming. While the exact number of employees impacted by the cut has yet to be finalized, a GM spokesperson suggested only about half would actually lose their jobs. Still, any job retention could be temporary if deliveries continue to slip. U.S. auto sales fell another 4.7 percent in April, continuing a decline in sales that began at the start of 2017.

The majority of those prospective cuts are expected to come from assembly lines that manufacture sedans, coupes, and convertibles. Traditional passenger cars only account for a third of the market now. Meanwhile, SUVs alone have gone from 28 percent of the market in 2006 to about 40 percent today.

“We don’t see it stopping,” said Mark LaNeve, the head of Ford Motor Co.’s sales, service and marketing division, adding that there will be significant shifts in production strategies, even if domestic car sales suddenly leveled off.

[Image: GM]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
10 of 25 comments
  • Shaker Shaker on May 11, 2017

    I wonder how Envision sales are doing...

    • See 7 previous
    • NormSV650 NormSV650 on May 16, 2017

      @highdesertcat The discounts for the lower trims of the Buick Envision are up to $10,000 off msrp in the Midwest at certain Dealerships or about $26,000 for a well equipped, near-luxury ride.

  • Jeff S Jeff S on May 11, 2017

    How about the fact that there has been a sales boom in new vehicle sales for the past 7 years. Isn't it reasonable to assume after 7 years of a sales boom that the sales would go through a slump? Much of the boom in sales can be attributed to those delaying purchases of new vehicles during the 2008 Melt Down. Many of those who delayed purchases have already bought new vehicles. Also longer term loans, low or no interest loans by manufacturers, and more favorable leasing deals have kept sales booming. Also people keep their vehicles much longer than they did years ago. Vehicles are expensive for many who have not been fortunate enough to have jobs that have not kept up with the cost of living. Also vehicles last longer. There are still many underemployed workers, workers whose jobs have either been phased out due to automation or cheaper labor overseas, and those who work in industries that are either dying or becoming obsolete. Many of the jobs that are lost will never come back due to just more automation. There is a technology revolution that has made many types of work obsolete, but at the same time there are new positions requiring much higher skills that require education and training. Cleaner and less expensive natural gas is displacing coal and even in the coal industry many jobs have been automated. Even industries that have come back to the US from cheaper foreign labor markets are using more robots requiring less labor. Robots don't get sick, take vacations, or go on strike and you can depreciate them over their useful lives.

  • Oberkanone Tesla license their skateboard platforms to other manufacturers. Great. Better yet, Tesla manufacture and sell the platforms and auto manufacturers manufacture the body and interiors. Fantastic.
  • ToolGuy As of right now, Tesla is convinced that their old approach to FSD doesn't work, and that their new approach to FSD will work. I ain't saying I agree or disagree, just telling you where they are.
  • Jalop1991 Is this the beginning of the culmination of a very long game by Tesla?Build stuff, prove that it works. Sell the razors, sure, but pay close attention to the blades (charging network) that make the razors useful. Design features no one else is bothering with, and market the hell out of them.In other words, create demand for what you have.Then back out of manufacturing completely, because that's hard and expensive. License your stuff to legacy carmakers that (a) are able to build cars well, and (b) are too lazy to create the things and customer demand you did.Sit back and cash the checks.
  • FreedMike People give this company a lot of crap, but the slow rollout might actually be a smart move in the long run - they can iron out the kinks in the product while it's still not a widely known brand. Complaints on a low volume product are bad, but the same complaints hit differently if there are hundreds of thousands of them on the road. And good on them for building a plant here - that's how it should be done, and not just for the tax incentives. It'll be interesting to see how these guys do.
  • Buickman more likely Dunfast.
Next