QOTD: Fifty Shades of Greyball?
Don’t look now, but the ride-sharing company everybody loves to hate is in trouble yet again. The Justice Department is reportedly opening an investigation into Uber’s not-so-secret “Greyball” tools, which can be used to circumvent law enforcement attempts to interfere with Uber’s business operations.
According to sources inside Uber, “Greyball” was originally developed to help protect Uber drivers from potential threats to their safety, such as unionized taxi drivers and other people who expressed their displeasure with Uber’s service in violent terms. The company soon realized Greyball could also be enhanced to help prevent “sting” operations in areas where ride-sharing services are illegal and/or heavily regulated.
I have no idea whether or not Uber will survive this unwanted federal attention; I’m reminded of the phrase used in the book Dune regarding “fools who put themselves in the way of the Harkonnen fist.” More interesting to me than that is the comment in the NYT article that some Uber employees had concerns about whether “Greyball” was “ethical.” That, I think, is the fascinating question.
Long-time readers know that I am at the very least ambivalent regarding the “gig economy” and Uber’s exploitation of its drivers. Regarding Greyball, however, I have far more moral clarity.
There is nothing unethical about Uber’s decision to deny service to government officials, would-be “sting” operators, or anyone else for that matter. The whole idea behind Uber is that it is a private enterprise, not a government-sanctioned monopoly like the NYC “taxi medallion” scam/scheme. If you are a taxi operator in New York, you give up control over all sorts of things — the vehicle you use, the drivers you hire, the fare you charge, even the routes that drivers are permitted to take. In exchange for that, you’re given a share in a monopoly so exclusive that medallion holders complain when they sell for a quarter-million dollars. Obviously, the fellow who just paid $241,000 for a taxi medallion isn’t going to drive the cab himself. So where’s the morality in all that?
Most of the municipalities where Uber operates in an undocumented, dreamer-like fashion prohibit ride-sharing because they want to protect those monopolies. Sometimes it’s out of concern for passenger access or safety, but more often it’s just money talking. I don’t think Uber has any ethical obligation to let those people run sting operations against them. If they want to deny rides to government mandarins or their enforcement thugs, then I don’t personally have an ethical issue with that.
The Founding Fathers felt the same way. American citizens have the right to avoid incriminating themselves, and they have the right to avoid entrapment. Greyball simply aids Uber drivers in availing themselves of those protections. There’s nothing unethical or immoral about that. We are not yet at the stage where obedience to city officials has a moral or ethical dimension. Not yet.
Now for your take. Do you think Uber is in the right?
More by Jack Baruth
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- SCE to AUX Too bad they didn't include Level 2.Banning Level 5 may be a mistake, since on paper it must work (unlike Level 2, which doesn't have to work). My concern is that mfr claims about Level 5 will be shattered by reality.
- Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Another Hyunkia'sis?
- FreedMike "It would be on my shopping list – especially since the price tag is pretty nice at $33,700 (plus $1,150 for D and D) for the manual and $35,200 plus destination for the DCT." True, but that's BEFORE the dealer markups, which are ludicrous.
- Jeff Tim--Thanks always good to have a car review especially a car with a manual transmission.
- Analoggrotto The best in the segment, hands down bar none. ATPs translate directly to street cred and Hyundai's got them. The GR Corolla regularly blows up engines while a pentagon certified data racing engine is installed in each and every one of these Rhys Millen proud machines. Proud to be an HMC fan.
Comments
Join the conversation
I can't comment on Uber for professional reasons. I can say two things: 1) as a general matter, it's almost always illegal to attempt to circumvent proper law enforcement procedures, and 2) Jack is not well versed in rules applicable to common carriers, and is painting a very misleading picture of the law as a result.
Uber and Taxi companies are both garbage. Talked with a former taxi driver: "Its a scam. You can't make any money, driving taxi." And what did he think of Uber? "Just as bad. Ten bucks and hour, and you wear out your own car! And pay your own gas and insurance!"