Mazda Keeps Certifying the Mazda 2 With CARB, But Why?

Mark Stevenson
by Mark Stevenson

It was January of 2015 and I was standing in a small venue in Montreal. The space was dark save some access lighting and red spotlights pointed at a sheet-covered car.

A few moments later, the sheet was pulled off, and Mazda Canada announced the 2016 Mazda 2 would be coming to The Great White North.

Eleven months later, Mazda Canada would reverse that decision, citing other all-new products — namely the CX-3 and MX-5 — requiring Mazda’s full attention. After all, the small automaker didn’t want to spread itself too thin, and it wasn’t like the previous-generation Mazda 2 set the sales charts on fire — on either side of the border.

In America, Mazda North America Operations had zero intention of selling the subcompact in any region other than Puerto Rico. Yet, year after year since the model went on sale in other global markets, Mazda continues to certify the Mazda 2’s emissions system with the California Air Resources Board, effectively making it eligible for retail sale in any of the 13 “CARB states” and District of Columbia.

Meanwhile, Mazda says it still has no intention to sell the Mazda 2 in America. What’s going on? We reached out to Mazda to get an answer.

The CARB certification process requires automakers to prove its emissions systems for every model, engine, and transmission combination comply with emissions regulations as set out by the State of California.

Mazda applying for and receiving a CARB certification for the Mazda 2 would make sense if Puerto Rico were a CARB region, but it isn’t, so there goes that theory.

Does that mean the Mazda 2 might come back to America?

“The Mazda2 will not be sold in the U.S., as there are markets better-served by that offering such as Puerto Rico and Mexico,” said Mazda product communications specialist Jacob Brown. “Mazda is in a different place in terms of market positioning as we shift our focus as a brand in the U.S.”

There goes theory No.2.

But there still must be a reason for Mazda continually certifying the Mazda 2. That process isn’t free. Thankfully, Brown was more than willing to explain, and the answer exists in Mazda’s partnership with Toyota to provide the Mazda 2-based Yaris iA.

“Under our partnership with Toyota, we agreed to certify the small car,” Brown explained before getting into the specifics of platform sharing.

The process works thusly: Mazda certifies the Mazda 2 with CARB, then Toyota shows up at CARB’s door and basically says, “Our car is the same as their car,” since Mazda cannot submit paperwork on behalf of Toyota.

Dan Ryan, Mazda’s vice president of government affairs, explained the process more thoroughly.

“Typically in situations like this, one of the companies agrees to handle the certification for emissions and safety. It is usually the company that had the lead in development. As another example, when we submitted safety information on the Tribute, we referred NHTSA to the Ford Escape data.”

So, our subcompact Mazda dreams are dashed and this is all just paperwork. That’s probably for the best.

[Image: Mazda]

Mark Stevenson
Mark Stevenson

More by Mark Stevenson

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 37 comments
  • Promit Promit on May 19, 2017

    We own a Mazda 2 from when they were launched in the US. Gas was temporarily expensive, everyone thought the B segment was going to be the big thing, and Mazda had ruined most of their cars with the horrors of the Joker grin. Except for some crazy reason, it works great on the 2, where it looks happy rather than psycho. There was no such thing as a Fiesta ST back then, and the Fit was the thing if you wanted to have C segment space in a subcompact but kinda sucked to drive. The Fiesta was worse in every way and it was downhill from there. Five years later, we're not sure what to do. A "loaded" Mazda2 didn't have stuff like... Bluetooth. Starting to miss some of the features we take for granted now, but the subcompact market is kinda trash. Only the FiST really offers a comparable driving experience and it's more expensive than the FoST for some insane reason.

    • Neit_jnf Neit_jnf on May 19, 2017

      Take a vacation in Puerto Rico and test drive a new 2. If you love it enough you can buy it and ship it over.

  • Cls12vg30 Cls12vg30 on May 22, 2017

    Judging by the comments, I must be weird. I rented a Mazda2 for a week in Southern California in December of '15. I enjoyed the lightness and handling during my brief foray into the Orange County canyons, but it was such a noisy rattletrap, especially out on the freeway, it was almost alarming. My brother's 2010 Yaris feels about the same, but I know that's a universally-hated car around here. My experience with my wife's 2015 Fiat 500 Sport is the polar opposite. It still has nearly perfect tiny car handling, but is much quieter and more comfortable at highway speeds. I think that's why the tin-can feeling of the Mazda surprised me so much. The Fiat feels downright refined by comparison, which is a statement that still hurts my brain on some level. The 500 was about $16k in the summer of 2015, so a bit pricier than a 2, but after my initial skepticism that little Fiat completely won me over. Two years later and it's still by far my wife's favorite car she's ever owned. Hell I wouldn't mind one with a manual myself (hers is an auto), but we've got to have at least one vehicle with more space, so a few months after she got the Fiat I grabbed a Jeep Renegade with the 500 Abarth's turbo motor and a six-speed, and it's still my second-favorite car I've ever owned. Yup, I'm definitely weird.

Next