GM to Pull Out of World's Second Most Populous Country, Sell Off Other Operations in Quest for Cash

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

In its global push for profitability, General Motors plans to yank the Chevrolet brand out of the hands of Indian consumers.

The automaker announced a wave of restructuring in overseas markets yesterday, a large part of which is the cancellation of nearly $1 billion in investment in India and the pull-out of its only brand. Until recently, GM had hoped to cater to the country’s growing middle class with a new line of region-specific Chevy models.

GM also plans to sell its South African division and cut back on staff in Singapore. The move will help the automaker free up money to funnel towards its biggest markets — North America and China.

The automaker’s overseas operations have struggled in recent years. Just two months ago, it reached a deal with France’s PSA Group to unload its money-losing European Vauxhall and Opel brands. The most recent plans will see it save $100 million per year in unprofitable regions.

“What are we spending our time doing?” GM President Dan Ammann told Reuters. “Are we spending time pursuing opportunities … or all of our time fixing problems?”

Ammann said by cutting back in these markets, GM can focus more senior management time and engineering effort towards its looming truck and SUV “onslaught.”

While Indians can say goodbye to GM vehicles — which faced increasing competition from the likes of Suzuki — the automaker will continue to build vehicles for export to Mexico, Central and South America at its Talegaon assembly plant. The GM design and engineering center in Bangalore will continue operations.

In South Africa, the automaker plans to stop producing Chevrolet vehicles after doing so in the country for 91 years and sell its assembly plant to Isuzu Motors. The Japanese automaker will also buy GM’s 30-percent stake in a joint truck-building operation for an undisclosed sun.

“We determined that continued or increased investment in manufacturing in South Africa would not provide GM the expected returns of other global investment opportunities,” said GM International President Stefan Jacoby in a statement.

Earlier this year, GM announced a pull-out in east Africa, with Isuzu purchasing its 57.7 percent stake in that venture. GM sales in both India and South Africa will cease by the end of the year.

[Image: GM]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 65 comments
  • Geozinger Geozinger on May 18, 2017

    The usual suspects on an anti-GM tirade. We have no inside info on why GM thinks it should shutter it's Indian division. I have no ideas either. However, during the Great Financial Crisis, folks told GM to "be more like Toyota". And after the loan guarantees (bailouts for the remaining tea baggers, I mean tea partyers), folks told GM to make enough money to never need a loan guarantee again. So, they're doing these things. Being more like Toyota and making enough money to not need loan guarantees again. They're shedding liabilities, employees and under-performing subsidiaries; not unlike GE or other big companies, i.e., Ford. But let's not information we don't have and a drive to make money get in the way of a good rant against GM. Because all of these armchair quarterbacks know the global production situation... Even Tata has a hard time selling the Nano in India. Chew on that for a while.

    • See 2 previous
    • Geozinger Geozinger on May 20, 2017

      @Higheriq: The issue with the Tata Nano, is that it was specifically designed for the Indian market. Which is why I find their lack of success all the more ironic. While the Suzuki Maruti models currently rule, it wasn't all that long ago they were still competing against the likes of the Hindustan Ambassador. I've never been to India and admit to not knowing a great deal about the country. Even with all of the automakers efforts to "crack" the Indian market, it appears to me that (what I would call the) scooter is still king of transportation for an economy on the rise. From what I gather, it will still be a while before the average Indian will have the capability to assimilate an automobile into their lives. With regard to GM's recent move there, we have a saying here that doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results is the definition of insanity. I believe that Ms Barra has taken the threat that GM will never receive overt US government assistance. To that end, it seems they are rationalizing business and maximizing profits where possible.

  • AdamOfAus AdamOfAus on May 19, 2017

    Which sun was Isuzu going to trade for those SA operations? Not our one I hope.

  • Mebgardner I test drove a 2023 2.5 Rav4 last year. I passed on it because it was a very noisy interior, and handled poorly on uneven pavement (filled potholes), which Tucson has many. Very little acoustic padding mean you talk loudly above 55 mph. The forums were also talking about how the roof leaks from not properly sealed roof rack holes, and door windows leaking into the lower door interior. I did not stick around to find out if all that was true. No talk about engine troubles though, this is new info to me.
  • Dave Holzman '08 Civic (stick) that I bought used 1/31/12 with 35k on the clock. Now at 159k.It runs as nicely as it did when I bought it. I love the feel of the car. The most expensive replacement was the AC compressor, I think, but something to do with the AC that went at 80k and cost $1300 to replace. It's had more stuff replaced than I expected, but not enough to make me want to ditch a car that I truly enjoy driving.
  • ToolGuy Let's review: I am a poor unsuccessful loser. Any car company which introduced an EV which I could afford would earn my contempt. Of course I would buy it, but I wouldn't respect them. 😉
  • ToolGuy Correct answer is the one that isn't a Honda.
  • 1995 SC Man it isn't even the weekend yet
Next