Camaro Comeback? Chevrolet Camaro Outsold Ford Mustang In April 2017, Sixth-Gen's Best Month Yet

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

General Motors reported 8,737 Chevrolet Camaro sales in the United States in April 2017, a 17-percent year-over-year increase for GM’s third-best-selling car last month.

For the sixth-generation Camaro, a car that had a decidedly unimpressive launch phase last year after routinely outselling the Ford Mustang for half a decade, April 2017’s improvement led to the best month yet. Not since the oft-discounted fifth-generation Camaro was nearing the end of its line in May 2015 has Camaro volume been so strong.

As for the headline-creating bits, yes, the Chevrolet Camaro beat the Ford Mustang in April 2017 U.S. sales. Camaro wins. Camaro is the victor. To the Camaro go the spoils.

GM must take time to enjoy its Camaro’s victories. Once routine, they’re hardly common now.

The Camaro was America’s preeminent sporty car — the top-selling muscle car/pony car/sports coupe/pick-your-title — for five consecutive years once the nameplate returned from hiatus in fifth-gen form. From its first full year in 2010 through 2014, the Camaro averaged 84,000 annual sales, essentially 1.1 Camaros for every Mustang.

And for the GM faithful who enjoyed not just their own victories but also Blue Oval losses, Ford’s annual average of 77,400 Mustang sales during that half-decade of Camaro leadership compared with nearly 137,000 annual Mustang sales during the Camaro’s absence (and prior to the Dodge Challenger’s launch.)

But the sixth-generation Ford Mustang got off to a torrid start as the Camaro reached the end of its fifth-generation’s run. Over the 24-month span of 2015 and 2016, Ford sold 228,281 Mustangs in America, adding many more in global markets where the Camaro doesn’t compete.

For the Camaro, the final year of the fifth-gen model and the first year for the sixth-gen model were the worst full years since the Camaro nameplate returned. Indeed, the new Camaro sold less often when it was brand new, last year, than when the old Camaro was oldest, the year before.

Not since a September/October burst last fall caused the Camaro to outperform the Mustang has the Ford fallen into the No.2 spot. (Those were the first monthly Camaro victories since October 2014.) But along with the Camaro’s 17-percent year-over-year uptick last month, Ford Mustang sales plunged 37 percent, a loss of 4,663 sales for a car that’s lost more than 12,000 sales already this year.

At Ford, the launch momentum was difficult to sustain, particularly for impractical cars, particularly when the overall market is in decline. Moreover, with a refreshed Mustang on the way for the 2018 model year, there’s a segment of the Mustang-buying population that will wait.

As for the Camaro’s April performance, it wasn’t because of a newfound emphasis on incentives. According to J.D. Power PIN data obtained by TTAC, the average Camaro left a Chevrolet dealer with $2,650 in discounts in April 2017. That was down 20 percent from March levels.

Through the first four months of 2017, the Camaro’s average transaction price has risen $2,347 compared with the same period one year ago. While the Mustang relies on fleet volume for roughly 35 percent of its U.S. sales, April’s Camaro mix was skewed 80 percent towards retail.

Timothy Cain is the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net and a contributing analyst at The Truth About Cars and Autofocus.ca. Follow on Twitter @timcaincars.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 23 comments
  • Ponchoman49 Ponchoman49 on May 18, 2017

    A Camaro convertible makes a good buy and eases the whole visibility thing quite nicely. My mom's long time friend has a 1969 blue convertible that she bought new in that year. I showed her a new blue V6 convertible with a black top and she really liked it. One test drive is all it took. She loved the car and was blown away (literally) but how nicely it drove and the power of the 335 HP V6. The price tag did give her pause

  • JohnAZ JohnAZ on May 18, 2017

    Mustang vs Camaro sales in Canada for April almost made up for the 700 car deficit for Mustangs in the US. Now add in the 140 other countries where the Mustangs are sold and they are by far the Best Selling Sports Car in the World.

  • MaintenanceCosts I already set out total costs, so this time I'll list what's had to be done on my cars (not counting oil changes, recall, or free services):2019 Bolt (25k mi): new 12v battery, pending tires & battery cooling service2016 Highlander (from 43k to 69k mi): new front rotors, new pads all around, new PCV valve, 2x 12v batteries, light bulbs, pending tires2011 335i (from 89k to 91k): new valve cover gasket, new spark plugs, light bulbs, pending rear main seal1995 Legend (from 185k to 203k): timing belt/water pump, new EGR valve + pipe, struts, strut bushings, drive axles, tie rods, rear control arms, other suspension bushings, coolant hose & brake lines throughout, belts, radiator, valve cover gaskets, new power antenna, 12v battery, coils, spark plugs, tires, rear pads... it's an old car!
  • VoGhost Consistent with CR's data. I've spent about $150 total on the Model 3 in six years of ownership, outside of tires.
  • VoGhost It's just plain sad that Posky doesn't know that EV batteries are warrantied for 8 years / 100K miles.
  • Jkross22 It used to be depreciation was the most expensive part of car ownership. Seems like those days are over (New EVs and lux cars excluded). Maintenance + insurance have taken over. Dealerships offering 2 years of maintenance means nothing. That's $200 tops. It's the unexpected repairs - a wiring harness, computer module, heater core, AWD problems - that will cost dearly. Brakes can be expensive since many cars now can't have rotors resurfaced. Even independents are charging a lot for this work.
  • FreedMike VW tossed in two years' maintenance on my car, and the next one's due after the lease is up. But all the car's needed has been oil changes and tire rotations. Unfortunately, the OEM tires (Hankook Kinergy) were unrepentant trash and needed to be replaced at around 23,000 miles. So...my maintenance cost over over a little under three years has been t $800 for the new tires. That sucks, but the new tires (Goodyear Eagle Sport) are a massive upgrade over the Hankooks. Ah well.
Next