Ford Has No Plans For China's Taurus To Become America's Taurus

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

The Ford Taurus’s North American demise is not unanticipated. Full-size car sales are flagging. The Taurus nameplate’s positive brand recognition is based on the success it enjoyed in another era. And Ford already revealed a new China-specific Taurus, based on the same CD4 platform as the Fusion and Lincoln Continental, with no announcement regarding the import of that vehicle to North America.

It also seems Ford, riding high on a wave of crossover and SUV sales on this side of the Pacific, won’t be bringing that Taurus to America anytime soon.

While speaking with Global Product Communications Craig von Essen on another matter, TTAC learned Ford’s plan for the Taurus is very much focused on China.

“The Taurus built and sold in China was introduced as an all-new flagship sedan for China, designed specifically to meet the needs of the Chinese consumers. At the moment, there are no plans to offer this vehicle elsewhere,” von Essen says.

As for the Taurus that continues to wither on the vine in North America, sales are down 6 percent through 2017’s first-quarter after falling 10 percent in calendar year 2016, 22 percent in 2015, and 22 percent in 2014. Ford is on track to sell approximately half as many Taurus sedans in the U.S. in 2017 as Ford sold just four years ago.

That includes the Taurus Police Interceptor Sedan, sales of which are sliding even faster in early 2017. Through the first three months of this year, Taurus Police Interceptor sales are down 19 percent, year-over-year, after declining in each of the last three calendar years. This year, 14 percent of the Tauruses sold are built as Police Interceptors.

Meanwhile, the Explorer Police Interceptor is attracting more than four times as many buyers as its Taurus counterpart. Ford has also unveiled a Fusion Hybrid-based police car that is now “ pursuit-rated.”

If the Police Interceptor isn’t a reason to save the Taurus, what about the strength of America’s full-size sedan market?

Uh, what strength?

The fleet-reliant large sedan segment has already lost more than 23,000 sales in the first three months of 2017, an 18-percent drop compared with the same period in 2016. Whether it’s the new Buick LaCrosse, the top-selling Dodge Charger, or the Taurus itself, big sedans at volume brands are tanking. Full-size volume brand sedans now form only 7 percent of America’s passenger car market.

Ford Motor Company builds both the Taurus and Explorer at its Chicago, Illinois, assembly plant. The Taurus’s Lincoln partner, the MKS, saw its production come to an end last year as Lincoln replaced the MKS with a Continental. The Continental is built alongside the Mustang in Flat Rock, Michigan.

The Taurus’s home market future isn’t the only Ford passenger car about which we have doubts. Two months ago, we questioned why Ford wouldn’t commit to the new Fiesta in America after revealing the car for European consumption. At the time, a Ford spokesperson told TTAC, “We’ll have more to say about other markets at a later date.”

We have twice inquired since as to whether Ford is ready to announce whether the new Fiesta will actually make it to the United States. Ford has declined to comment.

The current Fiesta has been on sale in the U.S. since 2010. The current Taurus rides on Ford’s Volvo-derived D3 platform, continuing a D3 sedan tradition that dates to the Ford Five Hundred’s introduction in 2004.

Timothy Cain is the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net, which obsesses over the free and frequent publication of U.S. and Canadian auto sales figures. Follow on Twitter @timcaingcbc.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 39 comments
  • Carguy622 Carguy622 on Apr 21, 2017

    I'm going to miss the nameplate more than the current car, which is just an average automobile. Growing up so many people I knew had Tauruses, especially the very sleek wagons. The Taurus name will always have a special place in my heart. The idiotic decision in the mid 2000s to name everything with an F, brought us the Fusion, which should have been names Taurus. Domestic manufacturers change nameplates too much!

  • Ponchoman49 Ponchoman49 on May 25, 2017

    I have driven and rode in my close friend's 2014 Taurus Limited AWD numerous times. The best part of that car was the V6, 6 speed transmission and the large trunk. Back seat legroom was good but not as good as some other full size cars and even a few mid sizers. The 19" factory tires gave it a busy thumpy ride but handling was sound considering it weighed in at over 4300 LBS! Gas mileage as a result was usually hovering around 17-18 with any city driving involved and highway stints generally saw about 23-24. The car did need 3 out of 4 of it's wheel bearings replaced before 100K, the blendoor motor went south and then it developed two separate oil leaks in the oil pan and a oil return line tube that rusted out. It also strangely went through 3 sets of tires in but 3 years time despite religious tire rotation. If it were my money it would be a 2014-17 Epsilon Impala every time over this car.

  • AZFelix UCHOTD (Used Corporate Headquarters of the Day):Loaded 1977 model with all the options including tinted glass windows, People [s]Mugger[/s] Mover stop, and a rotating restaurant. A/C blows cold and it has an aftermarket Muzak stereo system. Current company ran okay when it was parked here. Minor dents and scrapes but no known major structural or accident damage. Used for street track racing in the 80s and 90s. Needs some cosmetic work and atrium plants need weeding & watering – I have the tools and fertilizer but haven’t gotten around to doing the work myself. Rare one of a kind design. No trades or low ball offers – I know what I got.
  • El scotto UH, more parking and a building that was designed for CAT 5 cable at the new place?
  • Ajla Maybe drag radials? 🤔
  • FreedMike Apparently this car, which doesn't comply to U.S. regs, is in Nogales, Mexico. What could possibly go wrong with this transaction?
  • El scotto Under NAFTA II or the USMCA basically the US and Canada do all the designing, planning, and high tech work and high skilled work. Mexico does all the medium-skilled work.Your favorite vehicle that has an Assembled in Mexico label may actually cross the border several times. High tech stuff is installed in the US, medium tech stuff gets done in Mexico, then the vehicle goes back across the border for more high tech stuff the back to Mexico for some nuts n bolts stuff.All of the vehicle manufacturers pass parts and vehicles between factories and countries. It's thought out, it's planned, it's coordinated and they all do it.Northern Mexico consists of a few big towns controlled by a few families. Those families already have deals with Texan and American companies that can truck their products back and forth over the border. The Chinese are the last to show up at the party. They're getting the worst land, the worst factories, and the worst employees. All the good stuff and people have been taken care of in the above paragraph.Lastly, the Chinese will have to make their parts in Mexico or the US or Canada. If not, they have to pay tariffs. High tariffs. It's all for one and one for all under the USMCA.Now evil El Scotto is thinking of the fusion of Chinese and Mexican cuisine and some darn good beer.
Next