Here Are the Brands That Won't Be Shipping Out to the Frankfurt Motor Show This Year

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Frankfurt is the real deal when it comes to trade events. Germany’s International Motor Show is the oldest and, frequently, the largest exhibition of new vehicles and automotive engineering on the planet. However, some important automakers are deciding not to bother with it this year.

The event’s organizer, Germany’s VDA industry association, has confirmed that several automakers have cancelled on the Internationale Automobil-Ausstellung in September 2017. While there will still be over 50 individual brands from Europe, Asia, and the United States, a few of the heavier hitters are following the trend of taking their marketing money off the floor and rerouting it back into digital advertising.

Brands forgoing Germany’s IAA exhibition include Nissan, Infiniti, Mitsubishi, Peugeot, DS, Volvo, Fiat, Alfa Romeo, and Jeep.

“Naturally we regret when individual exhibitors will not be in Frankfurt this time. The reasons are varying and each specific to the company, but mainly connected to financial or corporate policies,” said VDA’s managing director Klaus Braeunig in the statement. “These exhibitors however have all spoken out in favor of strong automotive trade shows and are open to returning in the future.”

Whether or not they return is dubious, however. Without a high-profile product to unveil, there isn’t much incentive to expend funds to transport the staff and sheet metal to a trade show when you can endlessly remind consumers about your other products online. PSA’s Citroen will be in attendance for that very reason, while its other brands — Peugeot and DS — are staying home.

“Each brand constantly compares the efficiency of its marketing investments to decide its participation in shows,” a PSA spokesman told Automotive News Europe. The company explained it was simply a matter of considering the possible return on investment and a lack of desire to take part in trade shows solely out of “habit.”

Nissan said its choice to avoid IAA resulted from a recent global assessment of the company’s event and show strategy. “Moving forward, we will adopt a flexible strategy using a combination of automotive, consumer and dedicated Nissan events and partnerships to broaden our reach and appeal among influencers and wider consumers,” a Nissan spokesperson said.

The cancellations in Germany are by no means an isolated incident. Trade shows have seen diminishing participation for years now. Ford didn’t bother to attend Paris last year and Detroit had a distinctive lack of interesting concepts or flash in 2017. Bob Lutz went to far as to call the event “mediocre at best, irrelevant at worst” and faulted it for keeping all the interesting technology in the basement.

Automotive focus has shifted heavily toward tech-related shows in the last few years. The Consumer Electronics Show — now just called “CES” — has seen an upswing in automakers hoping to show off their latest and greatest features. Meanwhile, traditional trade shows are becoming progressively more lackluster and are likely doomed to continue down that path as car builders take their marketing cash out of the physical realm.

[Image: Internationale Automobil-Ausstellung]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
 6 comments
  • Eggsalad Eggsalad on Apr 06, 2017

    As a person who has built booths for NAIAS (although this in no way makes me an authority) these things are EXPENSIVE. Forget what it costs to rent the floor space, the construction and installation of a booth takes weeks and costs tens of millions. Yes, some elements are re-used from year to year and show to show, but fewer than you'd think. In these days of Internet sneak peeks and full reveals, I don't find it surprising that manufacturers can find better ways to spend these tens of millions of dollars.

    • See 4 previous
    • Lorenzo Lorenzo on Apr 07, 2017

      @threeer A lot of the models I wanted to sit in were of the 'do not touch' variety. The few that allowed you to sit in them had knobs missing. All it takes is a few kleptos to ruin it for everyone.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next