Toyota Launches C-HR In April, Plans To Unveil Another Subcompact Crossover At The New York Auto Show In April

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

Toyota hasn’t even delivered the new 2018 C-HR to dealers and there are already plans to supplement the automaker’s subcompact crossover lineup.

In concert with the C-HR’s U.S. launch next month, April 2017 will also play host to the Toyota debut of a small crossover concept at the New York International Auto Show if all goes according to plan.

“I think we’re very well set up (with the C-HR and midsize RAV4 CUV), but we’re also kind of looking at what else could we be doing there if this continues to be a growing segment, which we anticipate it will,” Bill Fay, vice president for the Toyota division, told Wards Auto.

Toyota expects to sell 60,000 C-HRs in the United States annually, more than the Yaris, Yaris iA, and Prius C combined. For America’s third-highest-volume SUV brand, that’s apparently not enough.

Slip an extra SUV on the barbie.

It’s not difficult to understand why the nascent subcompact crossover segment holds such appeal to automakers. The subcompact cars that have forever existed as a means of courting young and first-time new car buyers have never been the providers of significant profit in North America, where consumers are five times more likely to choose a more refined, spacious, and powerful compact with little financial or fuel economy penalty.

But take that subcompact platform and elevate the price, sometimes dramatically, and the equation is flipped on its head.

Just look at Mazda, formerly a niche player in the subcompact car category with the Mazda 2 and now a lower-tier candidate in the subcompact crossover category. In 2014, Mazda sold fewer than 14,000 copies of the Mazda 2, priced roughly between $15,000–17,000. In 2016, the Mazda CX-3 — at its core, an elevated next-generation Mazda 2 — attracted nearly 19,000 buyers with MSRPs ranging from $20,900–27,180 — and an inordinately high number of the CX-3s sold are of the more costly sort.

With the lure of greater profit potential and the clear shift in demand toward utility vehicles across the industry, automakers are stocking up their small CUV shelves.

To the Nissan Rogue and Juke ( and/or the Nissan Kicks), Nissan will fill an apparent void with the Rogue Sport, a rebadged Qashqai.

Below the Cherokee, Jeep will sell the new tweener-sized Compass along with the Renegade, a subcompact crossover sales leader.

General Motors taps two different subcompact CUV price points with the Chevrolet Trax and Buick Encore, which together owned nearly 30 percent of America’s subcompact crossover market in 2016.

Mitsubishi will squeeze the ghastly Eclipse Cross in between a smaller Outlander Sport and the Outlander.

And before Toyota sells its first C-HR in America, Toyota clearly intends to investigate the possibility of a C-HR cohort. In fact, based on Bill Fay’s language to Wards, the investigatory period may well be past the concept stage. Pointing to the hyperactivity in the segment, “I think everybody is looking at, ‘What’s the best way to meet that customer demand?'” Fay says.

Of course, an all-wheel-drive option would at least propel the 2018 Toyota C-HR into the center of the subcompact crossover argument. Available with AWD in other markets, the C-HR arrives in the United States with front-wheel drive, a 144-horsepower 2.0-liter four-cylinder, and dimensions that essentially match the old Toyota Matrix.

Another subcompact crossover? The Toyota C-HR doesn’t even meet the TTAC Slack chat definition of a crossover. Perhaps Toyota’s New York concept car debut will.

Toyota has shown small SUV concepts in the recent past: the Urban Utility in 2014 and the ME.WE in 2013, pictured above.

More recently, U.S. sales of subcompact crossovers are up 13 percent through the first two months of 2017 in a overall market that’s declined nearly 2 percent.

Timothy Cain is the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net, which obsesses over the free and frequent publication of U.S. and Canadian auto sales figures. Follow on Twitter @goodcarbadcar and on Facebook.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 28 comments
  • Anthony Magagnoli Anthony Magagnoli on Mar 03, 2017

    This whole compact SUV segment makes me sick. The cars are heavier, taller, slower, less fuel efficient, costlier, ride more harshly, handle worse, and have less interior space. Just so that buyers can say they have a “crossover”. It’s ridiculous. I love everything that Mazda makes, notably the Mazda3 and the CX-5, yet I loathe the CX-3. The reorientation of the great Mazda3 into a crossover simply ruins it for all the reasons stated above. My fiancee' is interested in the C-HR. We'll go drive it when it comes out and she'll likely realize that 133hp will be wholly unsatisfying after having been driving 6-cyl BMW's for a couple years. If someone wants a Toyota in this segment, the iM is a much better choice, yet it's cheaper for a better car!

    • Rolando Rolando on Mar 05, 2017

      I dislike CUVs in General. But for Mazda, it makes sense to "GLA" the the 3 into a "CX4" and collect the $$$. Keep a low end "sport" model for the 3 and a "lowered" CX4 Speed model for us drivers!

  • OldManPants OldManPants on Mar 03, 2017

    You ain't gettin' no dishwasher home in that crumpled-up little ball of ugly.

    • See 1 previous
    • OldManPants OldManPants on Mar 04, 2017

      @TonyJZX Well, yeah... I was kinda just using dishwasher as a universally grasped volume reference but OK, Mr. Picky, you ain't bringin' home Oddjob's compacted Continental nor History's largest Chunky bar in one, neither.

  • 28-Cars-Later "Farley expressed his belief that Ford would figure things out in the next few years."Ford death watch starts now.
  • JMII My wife's next car will be an EV. As long as it costs under $42k that is totally within our budget. The average cost of a new ICE car is... (checks interwebs) = $47k. So EVs are already in the "affordable" range for today's new car buyers.We already have two other ICE vehicles one of which has a 6.2l V8 with a manual. This way we can have our cake and eat it too. If your a one vehicle household I can see why an EV, no matter the cost, may not work in that situation. But if you have two vehicles one can easily be an EV.My brother has an EV (Tesla Model Y) along with two ICE Porsche's (one is a dedicated track car) and his high school age daughters share an EV (Bolt). I fully assume his daughters will never drive an ICE vehicle. Just like they have never watched anything but HiDef TV, never used a land-line, nor been without an iPad. To them the concept of an ICE power vehicle is complete ridiculous - you mean you have to STOP driving to put some gas in and then PAY for it!!! Why? the car should already charged and the cost is covered by just paying the monthly electric bill.So the way I see it the EV problem will solve itself, once all the boomers die off. Myself as part of Gen X / MTV Generation will have drive a mix of EV and ICE.
  • 28-Cars-Later [Model year is 2010] "and mileage is 144,000"Why not ask $25,000? Oh too cheap, how about $50,000?Wait... the circus is missing one clown, please report to wardrobe. 2010 AUDI A3 AWD 4D HATCHBACK PREMIUM PLUS
  • 28-Cars-Later So Honda are you serious again or will the lame continue?
  • Fred I had a 2009 S-line mine was chipped but otherwise stock. I still say it was the best "new" car I ever had. I wanted to get the new A3, but it was too expensive, didn't come with a hatch and no manual.
Next