Subaru Is Way Too Reliant On U.S. Market, Needs A New Market, Chooses Sweet Land Of Liberty

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

“Washington is not a place to live in. The rents are high, the food is bad, the dust is disgusting and the morals are deplorable. Go South, young man, go South and grow up with the country.” —Not Horace Greeley

Subaru generates 60 percent of its global sales in the United States. For a Japanese brand that still relies on imports for half of its volume in its largest market, Subaru knows that 60-percent reliance on America is way too high.

Subaru needs strength in other markets. Subaru needs to diversify its portfolio. Subaru needs another America.

Unfortunately for Subaru, history suggests the brand won’t quickly find strength in other markets. History suggests Subaru’s attempts to diversify its portfolio won’t succeed.

Fortunately for Subaru, however, there is more America.

“It’s true we want to increase sales in other countries, but in terms of the place with the best chance to increase sales, it has to be America’s Sun Belt,” Yasuyuki Yoshinaga, CEO at Subaru’s Fuji Heavy Industries parent company, told Bloomberg.

In other words, Subaru wants to add some New Orleans to its order of New Hampshire; Burlington with a side of Birmingham; Kennebunkport supplemented with a dose of Port St. Lucie.

When it comes to offshore alternatives, Subaru is shorthanded.

In Europe’s two biggest markets, Germany and the United Kingdom, Subaru’s market share currently stands at 0.2 percent and 0.1 percent, respectively, hardly the strong foundations on which significant growth can be formulated.

Subaru owns just 0.2 percent of the Chinese market and has no presence in India.

As a result, Subaru’s eyes are drawn back to the United States, where Subaru has garnered record annual sales in eight consecutive years, a streak which began during the depths of the recession. Subaru has more than doubled its U.S. volume since 2011 and essentially tripled its U.S. volume since 2009.

Subaru, therefore, fears no downturn in the U.S. market, widely expected to be a modest one if it turns out the industry peaked in 2017. Subaru has proven its ability in the past to overcome poor U.S. economic conditions. With improved availability, Subaru believes it could do so again. But the brand’s U.S. horizons must be expanded, as Yoshinaga told Bloomberg, “There’s no other way for us” besides U.S. concentration.

There are certainly states open for business if Subaru can find a way to convert its rugged, all-wheel-drive appeal in the northeast, northwest, and mountain states to a message that appeals to buyers who don’t encounter snow, ice, and slush.

Subaru will want to play up its reliability, safety, and resale reputations where AWD is a less meaningful feature. On Consumer Reports’ 2017 list of the best brands, Subaru ranked fifth overall and first among mainstream auto brands. At the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, the Crosstrek and WRX are Top Safety Picks; the Impreza, Forester, Legacy, and Outback earn Top Safety Pick+ ratings. In ALG’s residual value awards, Subaru leads all mainstream brands, with the Impreza, Legacy, WRX, Crosstrek, Forester, and Outback all winning their respective categories.

If Subaru wants to sell more cars, however, the automaker must continue to battle a good problem: poor supply. Heading into February, Subaru had only 36 days of U.S. inventory — 60 days would be more appropriate. This low level of supply and high level of demand has allowed Subaru to keep incentives low and profit margins high. According to ALG, Subaru’s incentive spending in February averaged just $896 per vehicle in an industry that spent $3,443 per vehicle. That equals a modest 3-percent discount on Subaru vehicles when the industry offers 10-percent discounts. Bloomberg says Subaru’ 2016 Q4 profit margin, at 11.6 percent, was industry-leading.

Through the first two months of 2017, as U.S. auto sales fell 1.5 percent compared with the same period one year earlier, Subaru volume jumped 7.5 percent. Rapid Outback growth, significant Impreza improvements, and Forester and Crosstrek increases have all played a role.

Timothy Cain is the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net, which obsesses over the free and frequent publication of U.S. and Canadian auto sales figures. Follow on Twitter @goodcarbadcar and on Facebook.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 92 comments
  • CincyDavid CincyDavid on Mar 16, 2017

    I think of Subaru as the successor to SAAB...quirky cars that they sell for relatively big bucks to people who are politically left-of-center.

    • 28-Cars-Later 28-Cars-Later on Mar 16, 2017

      I couldn't speak for SAAB but Subaru finds buyers of all kinds in this neck of the woods.

  • CincyDavid CincyDavid on Mar 16, 2017

    I tried to edit my previous comment because I hit SEND prematurely...wouldn't let me. At any rate, my sister and her spouse used to have 2 Jeep Libertys, and as they have fallen apart, they've been replaced with stripped down Subaru "tall wagons". They seem happy so far, but that's the only direct exposure I've ever had to Subaru products. I'm not convinced of the value of 4wd/AWD, even in hilly SW Ohio...the only time it kicks in with our Sportage and CRV is if I spin the tires leaving a stop sign, on the painted stripe in the road...then the rear wheels MIGHT engage with a clunk, and only momentarily.

  • Lou_BC "That’s expensive for a midsize pickup" All of the "offroad" midsize trucks fall in that 65k USD range. The ZR2 is probably the cheapest ( without Bison option).
  • Lou_BC There are a few in my town. They come out on sunny days. I'd rather spend $29k on a square body Chevy
  • Lou_BC I had a 2010 Ford F150 and 2010 Toyota Sienna. The F150 went through 3 sets of brakes and Sienna 2 sets. Similar mileage and 10 year span.4 sets tires on F150. Truck needed a set of rear shocks and front axle seals. The solenoid in the T-case was replaced under warranty. I replaced a "blend door motor" on heater. Sienna needed a water pump and heater blower both on warranty. One TSB then recall on spare tire cable. Has a limp mode due to an engine sensor failure. At 11 years old I had to replace clutch pack in rear diff F150. My ZR2 diesel at 55,000 km. Needs new tires. Duratrac's worn and chewed up. Needed front end alignment (1st time ever on any truck I've owned).Rear brakes worn out. Left pads were to metal. Chevy rear brakes don't like offroad. Weird "inside out" dents in a few spots rear fenders. Typically GM can't really build an offroad truck issue. They won't warranty. Has fender-well liners. Tore off one rear shock protector. Was cheaper to order from GM warehouse through parts supplier than through Chevy dealer. Lots of squeaks and rattles. Infotainment has crashed a few times. Seat heater modual was on recall. One of those post sale retrofit.Local dealer is horrific. If my son can't service or repair it, I'll drive 120 km to the next town. 1st and last Chevy. Love the drivetrain and suspension. Fit and finish mediocre. Dealer sucks.
  • MaintenanceCosts You expect everything on Amazon and eBay to be fake, but it's a shame to see fake stuff on Summit Racing. Glad they pulled it.
  • SCE to AUX 08 Rabbit (college car, 128k miles): Everything is expensive and difficult to repair. Bought it several years ago as a favor to a friend leaving the country. I outsourced the clutch ($1200), but I did all other work. Ignition switch, all calipers, pads, rotors, A/C compressor, blower fan, cooling fan, plugs and coils, belts and tensioners, 3 flat tires (nails), and on and on.19 Ioniq EV (66k miles): 12V battery, wipers, 1 set of tires, cabin air filter, new pads and rotors at 15k miles since the factory ones wore funny, 1 qt of reduction gear oil. Insurance is cheap. It costs me nearly nothing to drive it.22 Santa Fe (22k miles): Nothing yet, except oil changes. I dread having to buy tires.
Next