Which Platform Will the Jeep Wrangler Pickup Use?

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

We know it’s coming. Jeep CEO Mike Manley, while speaking at the North American International Auto Show, definitively stated the next-generation Wrangler will spawn a pickup. However, nobody has said anything about what the soup base for this new Wrangler stew is going to use.

When Jeep showcased the Gladiator pickup concept way back in the DaimlerChrysler era, it was built using Ram 1500 framework. It was a truck converted into a Wrangler essentially, instead of a Wrangler modified into the pickup format. While it’s been a decade since that concept saw the light of day, its recipe might still be the one FCA uses for a modern-day incarnation.

There’s evidence to support that claim, but — be warned — there is also speculation ahead.

Initially, the pickup was intended to coincide with the release of the updated JL Wrangler. Then Manley told The Detroit News that the JT pickupwhich FCA hasn’t yet given an official name — wouldn’t begin production until the end of 2019. This will follow FCA’s conversion of its Toledo North Assembly Plant from unibody to body-on-frame production. During retooling, current JK Wranglers will continue assembly at the complex’s South Assembly Plant.

However, Automotive News’ Fiat Chrysler expert Larry Vellequette says he has inside information that the Southern Plant is shutting down in April 2018 specifically because the JT pickup is too long for the paint shop at the Ohio factory. That doesn’t exactly convince me that FCA will use 1500 architecture. After all, who wouldn’t have thought the Wrangler pickup was going to be a longer vehicle? Early spy shots show it looking several inches longer than the JK, and that could just be down to the addition of the bed and some overhang.

It isn’t quite an a-ha moment, but Vellequette also reminded readers that FCA CEO Sergio Marchionne has mentioned the possibility of Mexican Ram production returning back to the United States — especially if Donald Trump begins throwing around those import tariffs he’s been talking about. FCA may even already be making plans to repatriate its trucks. If so, platform sharing the JT with the 1500 would make good financial sense.

The bottom line: we still don’t know if Jeep’s pickup will use the next-generation JL Wrangler frame, the older JK chassis, or make use of Ram 1500 framework. While this news does make the latter option possible, it’s by no means an assurance. In the end, it might not even matter. Wrangler loyalists are exactly that — loyal. Provided it looks and feels like their beloved 4×4, it should sell regardless of what underpins it.

(Although, I’m curious which platform off-road enthusiasts prefer to see.)

[Image: Jeep]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 29 comments
  • Saarinen Saarinen on Mar 15, 2017

    I hope they stick with a size that is close to the current Wrangler Unlimited, however I would like to see a drastic improvement in the towing capacity. I would gladly exchange some rock crawling ability to tow 5,000 - 6,000 lbs. Most important feature to remain needs to be the removable top!

    • Gtem Gtem on Mar 15, 2017

      Saarnin I think that would be as simple as retuning the suspension somewhat, less emphasis on articulation, more on load-bearing. The JKU has got a decently long wheelbase, minimal rear overhang, and a decent powerplant to do light-medium towing with.

  • Jeff S Jeff S on Mar 15, 2017

    We have heard this before. Seeing a picture and reading an article about a Jeep truck is not the same as seeing one in the wild.

  • Jeff My wife owned a 2013 AWD CRV since new it has been trouble free but I am not a fan of turbos so I would lean toward the Rav 4. If I were getting a hybrid it definitely would be a Rav 4 with Toyota's hybrid system being the best. Honestly you could not go wrong with either a CRV or a Rav 4. My third choice would be a Mazda.
  • 3-On-The-Tree We like our 2021 Rav4 non hybrid.
  • Vatchy FSD never has been so what is with the hype about robo-taxis? You would need the first in order for the second to work.
  • EBFlex Honda all day long. Why? It's a Honda.
  • Lou_BC My ex had issues with the turbo CRV not warming up in the winter.I'd lean to the normally aspirated RAV 4. In some cases asking people to chose is like asking a Muslim and Christian to pick their favourite religion.
Next