After Dozens of Fires, Mercedes-Benz Recalls One Million Vehicles

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Unexpected fires rank among the topmost fears of any automaker, and Mercedes-Benz is dealing with plenty of them.

After reports of 51 fires in late-model vehicles, 30 of them in the U.S., the German luxury automaker will recall roughly one million vehicles worldwide to prevent an electrical fault from causing even more.

The issue afflicts a number of different models and stems from a starting current limiter that can become overloaded during the starting procedure. No injuries have been reported from the fires, and the automaker has already installed a fix on new models coming off the production line.

However, Reuters reports that Mercedes-Benz has placed a stop-sale order on all unsold vehicles left on dealer lots. Those vehicles won’t budge until fixed.

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the models include 2015-2017 C-Class vehicles, CLA models from the same time period, 2017 E-Class and GLA models, and 2016-2017 GLC vehicles.

The NHTSA recall report states:

In the event the starter is blocked due to engine/transmission damage (e.g. hydro locked engine), a very high electric current would flow through the starting current limiter during the subsequent start attempt. Should the driver attempt to start the engine repeatedly despite the engine not cranking, the very high electric current draw might lead to overheating of the starting current limiter. In a worst case, surrounding components might melt, and potentially ignite and lead to a fire.

Of the one million models recalled, 354,434 were sold in the U.S.

Parent company Daimler AG launched a preliminary investigation in June 2016 after receiving reports of fires. Over the following months, investigators zeroed in on the starting current limiter as the culprit.

“Owners will be notified with an interim letter in late March, and again when parts become available in July 2017, approximately one week after recall launch to the dealers,” the report reads.

So, if your Mercedes doesn’t start on the first try, consider going back inside and watching Netflix instead of cranking that sucker again.

[Image: Mercedes-Benz]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 54 comments
  • Dukeisduke Dukeisduke on Mar 06, 2017

    Are they having that many hydro-locked engines? My brother managed to hydro-lock a '70 Olds 455 (in a Ninety-Eight), which bent a rod and ruined two pistons (numbers 5 and 7, on the driver's side at the rear). He had let the thing overheat on several occasions (leaky radiator), and eventually warped the heads, block(!), and intake. Attempted cranking drained the battery and cooked the insulation on the positive battery cable.

  • Carquestions Carquestions on Mar 06, 2017

    There is something very fishy about this recall - "Dozens of fires"? I can count on one hand how many vehicles I've seen with a locked engine that wasn't due to driving through water - - Mercedes is lying about the cause - it's not because of a locked engine. A locked engine could do it and that's why they use the excuse - but floods being the most common reason of a locked engine would never become a recall and other reasons are so rare that it is extremely unlikely - I'm calling it BS - Mercedes just lied to NHTSA about the cause

  • Theflyersfan The wheel and tire combo is tragic and the "M Stripe" has to go, but overall, this one is a keeper. Provided the mileage isn't 300,000 and the service records don't read like a horror novel, this could be one of the last (almost) unmodified E34s out there that isn't rotting in a barn. I can see this ad being taken down quickly due to someone taking the chance. Recently had some good finds here. Which means Monday, we'll see a 1999 Honda Civic with falling off body mods from Pep Boys, a rusted fart can, Honda Rot with bad paint, 400,000 miles, and a biohazard interior, all for the unrealistic price of $10,000.
  • Theflyersfan Expect a press report about an expansion of VW's Mexican plant any day now. I'm all for worker's rights to get the best (and fair) wages and benefits possible, but didn't VW, and for that matter many of the Asian and European carmaker plants in the south, already have as good of, if not better wages already? This can drive a wedge in those plants and this might be a case of be careful what you wish for.
  • Jkross22 When I think about products that I buy that are of the highest quality or are of great value, I have no idea if they are made as a whole or in parts by unionized employees. As a customer, that's really all I care about. When I think about services I receive from unionized and non-unionized employees, it varies from C- to F levels of service. Will unionizing make the cars better or worse?
  • Namesakeone I think it's the age old conundrum: Every company (or industry) wants every other one to pay its workers well; well-paid workers make great customers. But nobody wants to pay their own workers well; that would eat into profits. So instead of what Henry Ford (the first) did over a century ago, we will have a lot of companies copying Nike in the 1980s: third-world employees (with a few highly-paid celebrity athlete endorsers) selling overpriced products to upper-middle-class Americans (with a few urban street youths willing to literally kill for that product), until there are no more upper-middle-class Americans left.
  • ToolGuy I was challenged by Tim's incisive opinion, but thankfully Jeff's multiple vanilla truisms have set me straight. Or something. 😉
Next