More Models and Soon: Daimler Promises to Amp-up Its Electric Vehicle Program

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

After a Wednesday announcement stating it had failed to cut fleet emissions for the first time since 2007, Daimler has promised to expand its electric vehicle program and shorten the timeline. However, the automaker isn’t willing to shoulder all the blame for not being green enough. Consumer trends have shifted strongly toward larger, less efficient crossovers and SUVs in recent years. Daimler knows this better than anyone with global sales of the Mercedes-Benz GLA, GLC, and GLE gradually replacing its more-stagnant sedan deliveries.

Still, Europe has set very specific emissions requirements and the German company has fallen behind. It’s time to make amends by publicly promising new electrified models and a corporate goal closer to the state-sponsored pollution target.

Mercedes’ mean emissions remained at 123 grams of carbon dioxide per kilometer last year — the same level as in 2015. It’s the first time in almost a decade that Daimler hasn’t been able to cut average pollution levels despite the introduction of more fuel-efficient engine options in almost every product line.

As a result, Reuters is reporting Daimler has publicly promised it will bring more than 10 new electric cars to the road before 2022. Its previous goal was to gradually roll out EVs through its new EQ brand, with almost that many hitting the world market by 2025 — but that was before it needed to apologize.

It won’t, however, be spending any additional capital to achieve the ambitious timeline. Wednesday’s announcement saw Daimler sticking to its original investment plan of 10 billion euros.

[Image: Mercedes-Benz]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
 2 comments
  • Lorenzo Lorenzo on Mar 30, 2017

    The Germans have painted themselves into a corner with electric vehicles. The German Greens have pushed for more renewable energy before it could handle the load, and a poor plan to drop coal, oil, and nuclear electric generation has given Germany some of the highest electricity rates in Europe. Germany is dependent on Russia for natural gas for heating, so it can't switch from coal to gas fired electricity generation like American power companies have. The best alternative is nuclear, but the German Greens have caused them to be shut down too, with the last one going out of service in 2022. What does that do for electric vehicles? It'll be even worse than American sales, especially with American oil production keeping global oil prices - and gasoline prices - at low levels for the foreseeable future. This looks like the absolute worst time to be depending on electric cars, but the alternative is smaller Benzes with smaller engines, just like the 1940s and '50s.

    • Yurpean Yurpean on Mar 30, 2017

      Nuclear is absolutely no replacement for gas. What a stupid statement. The advantage of gas is the fast spin up and spin down. A nuclear reactor can't do that, neither can a coal plant.

Next