Volkswagen Brass Fights Back After Ex-Chairman Points Finger… at Them

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Ferdinand Piëch, former chairman of Volkswagen and grandson of Beetle creator Ferdinand Porsche, is in hot water with his former company.

The ex-chairman resigned in April 2015 — five months before the diesel emissions scandal broke — after the company’s steering committee put his future to a vote. Piëch lost after his rival, then-CEO Martin Winterkorn, saw VW management rally to his side.

A suspiciously hostile divide existed between both men at the time, and recent comments by Piëch may explain why the two doomed executives became such bitter enemies. To say that VW’s supervisory board isn’t happy with his comments would be an understatement.

Reuters reports Piëch recently told the German publications Bild am Sonntag and Der Spiegel that he accused the board members of inaction after learning about the emissions cheating.

The rigged diesel engines were first discovered by researchers in the U.S., and before long, American regulators were demanding answers. Piëch claims that he first heard of the cheating by way of an Israeli security firm. During a March 2015 board meeting, he raised the issue with other top brass, including Winterkorn.

Winterkorn reportedly downplayed the issue, Piëch said, and told him everything was under control.

The former CEO resigned just days after the scandal broke in September of that year. Currently, Winterkorn is under investigation in his home country, suspected of committing fraud by concealing knowledge of the rigged engines.

Following the meeting, Piëch “distanced” himself from Winterkorn, telling others as much. So great was the acrimony between the two that the company’s steering committee was forced into an emergency meeting to decide who would be kicked off the island. Of course, Winterkorn’s victory would be short-lived.

Now, the top brass that abandoned Piëch are condemning him for his remarks.

“The supervisory board of Volkswagen AG emphatically repudiates the assertions made by Ferdinand Piëch as reported recently in the media,” VW’s supervisory board said in a statement released today. “The board of management will carefully weigh the possibility of measures and claims against Mr. Piëch.”

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 8 comments
  • Hreardon Hreardon on Feb 08, 2017

    I sincerely doubt that Herr Dr. Piech was completely in the dark about the emissions scandal, but the falling out with Winterkorn, his protege, in 2015 was very odd, even for Piech. I suspect that early in 2015 he discovered how bad things really were and at that point started creating trouble for Winterkorn by asking lots of very pointed questions. Piech is Machiavelli incarnate, and his "distancing" from Winterkorn could very possibly be a ruse: once Piech was made aware that the gig was up, this may have been his way of throwing others under the bus to shield himself. Best story about Piech is Bob Lutz's retelling of Piech's demands for tighter panel gaps on the Golf IV (paraphrasing here): he pulled a group of engineers into a room and said, "The new Golf will have 2mm panel gaps. I have all of your names. If I do not have 2mm panel gaps in six months, you will be fired." When you lead with that kind of autocracy, you get people too scared to speak truth to power.

    • See 1 previous
    • Hreardon Hreardon on Feb 09, 2017

      @Lorenzo Wouldn't surprise me in the slightest, though I suspect it was Winterkorn channeling Piech. Ultimately, it was Piech who created Volkswagen's modern corporate culture of fear. Piech had vision and the means to will that vision into reality. The problem is the way in which he did it: through fear, intimidation, sowing dissent and chaos. It leads to a company where nobody is willing to speak up when it really matters.

  • DudeMcLovin DudeMcLovin on Feb 08, 2017

    I love watching assholes throw each other under the bus. You simply can't have a cover up that big without lots of people knowing about it. Let the shit show continue!

    • Lorenzo Lorenzo on Feb 09, 2017

      I'm not so sure there were that many people involved. It was a programming scam, and that can be limited in terms of the people originally "in the know". That also limits the number of people needed to cover it up. The paper trail would be small, allowing just a few people to get rid of memos and meeting minutes. A lot of engineers (and Bosch) would have suspicions, but not a lot of hard facts/evidence to go on. They kept it all under wraps for several years, until scientists did a deep dive into the electronics. That should make you think the inner circle was very small. In an American business, the janitors know everything, but in a German business, where only the German penchant for record-keeping needs to be stifled, the strict adherence to chain of command can get the job done.

  • TCowner Need to have 77-79 Lincoln Town Car sideways thermometer speedo!
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I'd rather they have the old sweep gauges, the hhuuggee left to right speedometer from the 40's and 50's where the needle went from lefty to right like in my 1969 Nova
  • Buickman I like it!
  • JMII Hyundai Santa Cruz, which doesn't do "truck" things as well as the Maverick does.How so? I see this repeated often with no reference to exactly what it does better.As a Santa Cruz owner the only things the Mav does better is price on lower trims and fuel economy with the hybrid. The Mav's bed is a bit bigger but only when the SC has the roll-top bed cover, without this they are the same size. The Mav has an off road package and a towing package the SC lacks but these are just some parts differences. And even with the tow package the Hyundai is rated to tow 1,000lbs more then the Ford. The SC now has XRT trim that beefs up the looks if your into the off-roader vibe. As both vehicles are soft-roaders neither are rock crawling just because of some extra bits Ford tacked on.I'm still loving my SC (at 9k in mileage). I don't see any advantages to the Ford when you are looking at the medium to top end trims of both vehicles. If you want to save money and gas then the Ford becomes the right choice. You will get a cheaper interior but many are fine with this, especially if don't like the all touch controls on the SC. However this has been changed in the '25 models in which buttons and knobs have returned.
  • Analoggrotto I'd feel proper silly staring at an LCD pretending to be real gauges.
Next