Report: Executive Orders Coming to EPA, but Will Automakers Get Their Wish?

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

President Donald Trump is poised to order changes at the Environmental Protection Agency once a new administrator is confirmed, sources at the regulator claim.

In a meeting Tuesday, EPA employees were told to expect two to five executive orders, Reuters reports. While the news will likely cause anxiety among the nation’s environmentalists, U.S. automakers are likely crossing their fingers for a different reason.

The meeting in the EPA’s Office of General Counsel saw employees told of the upcoming orders by a senior official who had spoken with members of the Trump administration. No details were provided.

“It was just a heads-up to expect some executive orders, that’s it,” one of the sources told Reuters.

Given Trump’s fixation on the American auto industry, as well as extensive lobbying from automakers and industry groups, it wouldn’t be a stretch to think that one of those orders could have something to do with corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) rules.

A midterm review of those standards is still ongoing, with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration yet to rule on whether the lofty fuel economy targets set by the Obama administration should stay in place. The EPA, however, gave the existing plan a thumb’s up shortly before Trump took office.

Industry groups cried foul over the EPA’s sudden approval, calling it a political move. The agency had another year to weight in on the targets. For the Detroit Three automakers, achieving the 54.5 mile-per-gallon average by the target year of 2025 means extra expense and higher sticker prices on vehicles.

“What we’re really trying to do is just restore the [midterm review process], and because the process was truncated, we don’t really know what the standards should be,” Gloria Bergquist, spokeswoman for the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, told Bloomberg last week.

Bergquist made the statement after the CEOs of 18 automakers, including the Detroit Three, sent a letter to Trump asking for a reset of the EPA review term.

“As recently as late last fall, EPA assured us that the MTR would not result in a final determination before the next administration came into office,” the executives wrote in the February 10th letter.

Trump’s EPA pick, Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt, will reportedly face a Senate confirmation vote on Friday.

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 77 comments
  • Lorenzo Lorenzo on Feb 16, 2017

    So the auto industry will have to wait until BOTH the EPA and NHTSA have new appointees? That's the gist of the comments I've read. As for politics, I read a fascinating argument that the origin of politics goes back to the stone age. In the beginning, humans were organized into clans, extended families of anywhere from 30 to 50 people of all ages. There were usually 3-4 key adult males in charge, and when a clan lost one or two, it was in serious trouble. Along came the tribe, a banding of several clans with the same organization, but a much larger pool of replacements for the leaders, and a better chance of survival. Politics began when individual clans jockeyed for position and influence within the tribe. Clans would ally with others, or intermarry and merge to increase their influence, until there were two or more factions within the tribe. The Founding Fathers warned us about factions, but that's what we have here in the U. S. of A. We may be devolving back into clans within our tribe.

  • DudeMcLovin DudeMcLovin on Feb 17, 2017

    I hope Matt Posky read this article. He refuses to accept that the CAFE standards may be changed. Like I said before, the Trump admin is unpredictable so you never know until the fat lady sings.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh *Why would anyone buy this* when the 2025 RamCharger is right around the corner, *faster* with vastly *better mpg* and stupid amounts of torque using a proven engine layout and motivation drive in use since 1920.
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I hate this soooooooo much. but the 2025 RAMCHARGER is the CORRECT bridge for people to go electric. I hate dodge (thanks for making me buy 2 replacement 46RH's) .. but the ramcharger's electric drive layout is *vastly* superior to a full electric car in dense populous areas where charging is difficult and where moron luddite science hating trumpers sabotage charges or block them.If Toyota had a tundra in the same config i'd plop 75k cash down today and burn my pos chevy in the dealer parking lot
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I own my house 100% paid for at age 52. the answer is still NO.-28k (realistically) would take 8 years to offset my gas truck even with its constant repair bills (thanks chevy)-Still takes too long to charge UNTIL solidsate batteries are a thing and 80% in 15 minutes becomes a reality (for ME anyways, i get others are willing to wait)For the rest of the market, especially people in dense cityscape, apartments dens rentals it just isnt feasible yet IMO.
  • ToolGuy I do like the fuel economy of a 6-cylinder engine. 😉
  • Carson D I'd go with the RAV4. It will last forever, and someone will pay you for it if you ever lose your survival instincts.
Next