Dodge Challenger SRT Demon Promises All of the Power, One of the Seats

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Things are getting downright kooky in Auburn Hills.

Fiat Chrysler Automobiles has become quite chatty in the past day, with company spokespersons confirming bizarre new details about the upcoming Dodge Challenger SRT Demon. Apparently, the beastly LX-platform variant is a real stripper.

Yes, to shed as much weight as possible from the Challenger Hellcat’s considerable mass, the mysterious Demon with make do without many of the things we’ve come to associate with modern automobiles.

Including seats.

No, the driver won’t be required to bring his or her own milk crate, but they sure won’t find themselves engaged in stimulating discussion. That’s because they’ll be alone.

When Dodge finally brings its devilish creation to consumers, the model will boast a single seat. Gone are the front passenger seat and rear bench. This, along with other notable deletions (described in detail by Motor Authority), is FCA’s easy and fast route to shedding 215 pounds from the vehicle’s weight. The missing seats alone account for 113 pounds of weight loss.

When we say this vehicle is a stripper, we mean it in the real, junkyard sense of the word. The automaker plans to ditch all but two stereo speakers, leaving one in each door, while scrapping 18 pounds of sound insulation. Those speakers had better be loud. Also on the list of missing components are the spare tire and trunk liner.

While it seems that FCA engineers simply tore down the model French Connection-style, there’s also a few factory add-ons to help the model’s slim-fast regimen. Dodge has seen fit to add narrower, hollow sway bars (shaving 19 pounds), 18×11-inch aluminum wheels (16 pounds), and smaller-diameter, 2-piece, 4-piston aluminum Brembos (16 pounds).

In a way, it’s a lot like the desperate weight-saving program that spawned the 1979 Chrysler R-bodies, only this one is steeped in performance, not malaise. Wider rubber and less weight equals an acceleration and handling boost, even if the Hellcat’s 707-horsepower V8 remains unchanged. However, few expect that mill to stay stock in Demon guise.

Some have said that the removal of extraneous seats makes this Dodge the ultimate bad-ass driving machine, but there’s something dangerously antisocial about a 4,200-pound car with only one seat. It’s like flying a kite at night. No one fully trusts the person doing that.

Luckily, it sounds like performance-minded drivers who like mingling with other humans will have a choice. Autoblog reports that rear and front passenger seats will remain on the options list. For a fee, a warm, loving couple can drive straight to hell in their new Demon.

Expect to see the vehicle revealed in full at the New York Auto Show in April.

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 55 comments
  • TMA1 TMA1 on Feb 02, 2017

    How much does side window glass weigh? Ditch it, as well as the door latch/locking mechanisms and handles. Weld the doors shut. The driver can go through the window, like the General Lee.

  • Baconator Baconator on Feb 09, 2017

    Silly, but fun. I'd imagine you can still bolt a Sparco or a Kirkey to the seat rails on the passenger side, a mod which is easy for an owner but probably a massive headache for a manufacturer to certify.

  • Fred I would get the Acura RDX, to replace my Honda HR-V. Both it and the CRV seats are uncomfortable on longer trips.
  • RHD Now that the negative Nellies have chimed in...A reasonably priced electric car would be a huge hit. There has to be an easy way to plug it in at home, in addition to the obvious relatively trickle charge via an extension cord. Price it under 30K, preferably under 25K, with a 200 mile range and you have a hit on your hands. This would be perfect for a teenager going to high school or a medium-range commuter. Imagine something like a Kia Soul, Ford Ranger, Honda CR-V, Chevy Malibu or even a Civic that costs a small fraction to fuel up compared to gasoline. Imagine not having to pay your wife's Chevron card bill every month (then try to get her off of Starbuck's and mani-pedi habits). One car is not the solution to every case imaginable. But would it be a market success? Abso-friggin-lutely. And TTAC missed today's announcement of the new Mini Aceman, which, unfortunately, will be sold only in China. It's an EV, so it's relevant to this particular article/question.
  • Ajla It would. Although if future EVs prove relatively indifferent to prior owner habits that makes me more likely to go used.
  • 28-Cars-Later One of the biggest reasons not to purchase an EV that I hear is...that they just all around suck for almost every use case imaginable.
  • Theflyersfan A cheaper EV is likely to have a smaller battery (think Mazda MX-30 and Mitsubishi iMEV), so that makes it less useful for some buyers. Personally, my charging can only take place at work or at a four-charger station at the end of my street in a public lot, so that's a crapshoot. If a cheaper EV was able to capture what it seems like a lot of buyers want - sub-40K, 300+ mile range, up to 80% charging in 20-30 minutes (tops) - then they can possibly be added to some lists. But then the issues of depreciation and resale value come into play if someone wants to keep the car for a while. But since this question is asking person by person, if I had room for a second car to be garaged (off of the street), I would consider an EV for a second car and keep my current one as a weekend toy. But I can't do a 50K+ EV as a primary car with my uncertain charging infrastructure by me, road trips, and as a second car, the higher insurance rates and county taxes. Not yet at least. A plug in hybrid however is perfect.
Next