Study: What's Driving Generational Purchasing Preferences?

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Despite some disparaging typecasting to the contrary, Millennials do know how to drive and aren’t a population of unmitigated phone-addicted car haters.

People under forty even have purchasing preferences associated with automotive ownership. However, some stereotypes ring especially true when compared to their nearest generational counterpart: Generation X.

Autolist recently conducted a representative survey of the two age-groups during the final quarter of 2016. Based on feedback from 3,383 vehicle owners nationwide, the study highlights key differences between the groups and shows why many automakers are scrambling to diversify their companies to better prepare themselves for the changing consumer winds.

Xers tend to be slightly more practical, conservative, and hold onto their vehicles longer. Millennials are, on average, more interested in newer cars and technology and less interested in price, brand loyalty, or longevity. Roughly two-thirds said they couldn’t see owning a car for more than seven years, while over 41 percent of Generation X was fine with with the concept.

When asked about the primary factors in considering their next vehicle, Millennials turned out to be five percent more likely to be concerned about the environmental impacts associated with car ownership — an issue that their older peers minimize through the longer-term ownership of more economical cars.

As for who is buying what, there’s plenty of overlap between groups. The Toyota Camry and Corolla were both extremely popular with both demographics. However, the most popular car for Millennials turned out to be the Honda Civic, while the Accord was most favored by Xers. Generation X also has a penchant for minivans — the Chrysler Town and Country and Honda Odyssey both made it into their top ten.

Younger buyers also had a slightly stronger preference for American iron. The Chevrolet Cruze and Ford Focus ranked high on their list, while Cadillac’s CTS was the luxury sedan of choice. Gen X went with the yuppie-friendly BMW 3 Series.

In the world of trucks, Ford’s F-150 remains is a big hit with nearly everyone, but surveyed Millennials actually like the Chevrolet Silverado 1500 slightly more. The Ford Mustang maintains its universal appeal for those interested in a more lively drive.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 177 comments
  • OldManPants OldManPants on Jan 25, 2017

    That steering wheel is giving her arthritis.

  • PentastarPride PentastarPride on Jan 25, 2017

    I prefer less features in my car, not more. I like "average", just add leather and a sunroof. I do care about reliability, which is why I don't think I will touch much of anything out there right now...Turbo this, start-stop that, nine-gazillion speed this...I have a feeling that the timeframe for cradle-to-grave for the average 2017-ish car will be about five years, when it used to be 10-20. Long-term ownership is my goal. I still have at least eight years to go on my '13 200. Quite frankly, I'm considering keeping it longer. It may not be fast nor is it cutting edge, but it has been a really great car. I like my car. My wife likes a new car every 3-5 years, but she pays for that (yes, we made an agreement for it to be that way). Brand loyalty? I am picky. I've only owned Mopar, hence my screen name. There are cars I might have considered from other brands (Ford, GM, Mercedes, Honda) but I have never considered a Toyota/Lexus or Volkswagen/Audi, for instance. As for everything else, it seems as if I'm everything that the archetypical millennial is not.

  • David Murilee Martin, These Toyota Vans were absolute garbage. As the labor even basic service cost 400% as much as servicing a VW Vanagon or American minivan. A skilled Toyota tech would take about 2.5 hours just to change the air cleaner. Also they also broke often, as they overheated and warped the engine and boiled the automatic transmission...
  • Marcr My wife and I mostly work from home (or use public transit), the kid is grown, and we no longer do road trips of more than 150 miles or so. Our one car mostly gets used for local errands and the occasional airport pickup. The first non-Tesla, non-Mini, non-Fiat, non-Kia/Hyundai, non-GM (I do have my biases) small fun-to-drive hatchback EV with 200+ mile range, instrument display behind the wheel where it belongs and actual knobs for oft-used functions for under $35K will get our money. What we really want is a proper 21st century equivalent of the original Honda Civic. The Volvo EX30 is close and may end up being the compromise choice.
  • Mebgardner I test drove a 2023 2.5 Rav4 last year. I passed on it because it was a very noisy interior, and handled poorly on uneven pavement (filled potholes), which Tucson has many. Very little acoustic padding mean you talk loudly above 55 mph. The forums were also talking about how the roof leaks from not properly sealed roof rack holes, and door windows leaking into the lower door interior. I did not stick around to find out if all that was true. No talk about engine troubles though, this is new info to me.
  • Dave Holzman '08 Civic (stick) that I bought used 1/31/12 with 35k on the clock. Now at 159k.It runs as nicely as it did when I bought it. I love the feel of the car. The most expensive replacement was the AC compressor, I think, but something to do with the AC that went at 80k and cost $1300 to replace. It's had more stuff replaced than I expected, but not enough to make me want to ditch a car that I truly enjoy driving.
  • ToolGuy Let's review: I am a poor unsuccessful loser. Any car company which introduced an EV which I could afford would earn my contempt. Of course I would buy it, but I wouldn't respect them. 😉
Next