You May Be Within Your Legal Rights to Strip Your Buyback Volkswagen Before Handing It Over

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Volkswagen and Audi have begun buying back the thousands of 2.0-liter diesel cars sold involved in its emissions cheating scandal. The deal requires the company to offer buybacks to the 475,000 affected owners. However, the settlement does not carefully outline what condition those returned vehicles have to be in.

Some owners are taking that inch for the full mile and stripping their VWs down before returning them to the company to get their big fat check.

The qualifications specified in the EPA’s Partial Consent Decree aren’t wildly specific, stating that vehicle only need to be “operable” to maintain eligibility or for the buyback. Document 1973-1 only offers the clarification that an operable vehicle means one driven under the power of its own 2.0-liter TDI. Returned vehicles also may not possess a branded title of “Assembled,” “Dismantled,” “Flood,” “Junk,” “Rebuilt,” “Reconstructed,” or “Salvaged” as of September 18, 2015.

Beyond that, it seems like you may be within your legal rights to hack off every non-essential piece of your TDI and return it with confidence. While it be supremely dickish to do so, it’s hard to feel guilty when the car is likely to suffer a similar fate in the hands of Volkswagen anyway.

Green Car Reports says most of the diesels will end up getting scrapped since it’s not cost-effective to repair and redistribute them — especially the older models. Still, if VW wants to spend the money, it is within its rights to export the cars for non-U.S. resale or fix them and place the units back on the American market as used vehicles.

A few indignant buyback owners on Reddit have discussed the morality and legality of removing choice pieces from their car, while a couple of posters have even confirmed that VW’s still handed them a check after returning an incomplete car. Jalopnik spoke to one user who removed the front fascia from his damaged Golf without VW making a stink. “Yes the front end I took off for my friend and then the back was in an accident,” Tacoboutnachos committed over Reddit.

He said he was still paid for his vehicle without issue, claiming that the VIN was the only part of the car inspected. That bodes well for anyone thinking about removing quarter panels or a hood.

While we can’t say for certain if Volkswagen will accept a buyback vehicle after you’ve removed several hundred pounds of it with a sawzall, there is definitely a chance that they might be legally obligated to. You can at least remove the floor mats, confident that you’ve stuck it to the man without him being able to do a damn thing about it.

Besides, if you did end up popping out your Jetta’s headlights or radio, what’s the worst thing Volkswagen could do about it? Accuse you of cheating the system?

[Image: Volkswagen]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 64 comments
  • GregAmy GregAmy on Dec 16, 2016

    A correction to your article. You wrote: "...it is within its rights to export the cars for non-U.S. resale..." That is incorrect. The decree clearly states, in section 7.2.3: "Settling Defendants may not export or arrange for the export of 2.0 Liter Subject Vehicles, unless such vehicle has been modified in accordance with the applicable Approved Emissions Modification pursuant to the terms of Appendix B of this Consent Decree." This means that until/unless these cars have the approved "fix" (assuming VW even comes up with one) the vehicles cannot even be exported to a location where they currently meet the emissions regulations. At least they backed off the original decree that stated all non-fixed cars had to be made inoperable by having a 3" hole punched in the engine block and the frame had to be sliced in two places...now they just require removal of the ECU, and "...in no event may the ECU, diesel oxidation catalyst, or diesel particulate filter be salvaged, resold, or exported."

  • GregAmy GregAmy on Dec 16, 2016

    It's pretty clear that VW has no interest in these vehicles. On their settlement web site, under the FAQ section, is this Q&A: Q: "My vehicle has been in an accident, and my Insurance Company wants to "Total" it. What Should I do?" A: "As long as your vehicle is operable under its own power, and you still have the title to it, or, if the car is financed, your lender holds the title, you can schedule a Buyback and drive it to your preferred Volkswagen or Audi Dealer." I find little moral/ethical dilemma in stripping the car after reading that.

  • David Murilee Martin, These Toyota Vans were absolute garbage. As the labor even basic service cost 400% as much as servicing a VW Vanagon or American minivan. A skilled Toyota tech would take about 2.5 hours just to change the air cleaner. Also they also broke often, as they overheated and warped the engine and boiled the automatic transmission...
  • Marcr My wife and I mostly work from home (or use public transit), the kid is grown, and we no longer do road trips of more than 150 miles or so. Our one car mostly gets used for local errands and the occasional airport pickup. The first non-Tesla, non-Mini, non-Fiat, non-Kia/Hyundai, non-GM (I do have my biases) small fun-to-drive hatchback EV with 200+ mile range, instrument display behind the wheel where it belongs and actual knobs for oft-used functions for under $35K will get our money. What we really want is a proper 21st century equivalent of the original Honda Civic. The Volvo EX30 is close and may end up being the compromise choice.
  • Mebgardner I test drove a 2023 2.5 Rav4 last year. I passed on it because it was a very noisy interior, and handled poorly on uneven pavement (filled potholes), which Tucson has many. Very little acoustic padding mean you talk loudly above 55 mph. The forums were also talking about how the roof leaks from not properly sealed roof rack holes, and door windows leaking into the lower door interior. I did not stick around to find out if all that was true. No talk about engine troubles though, this is new info to me.
  • Dave Holzman '08 Civic (stick) that I bought used 1/31/12 with 35k on the clock. Now at 159k.It runs as nicely as it did when I bought it. I love the feel of the car. The most expensive replacement was the AC compressor, I think, but something to do with the AC that went at 80k and cost $1300 to replace. It's had more stuff replaced than I expected, but not enough to make me want to ditch a car that I truly enjoy driving.
  • ToolGuy Let's review: I am a poor unsuccessful loser. Any car company which introduced an EV which I could afford would earn my contempt. Of course I would buy it, but I wouldn't respect them. 😉
Next