Ford to Become Captain of the Fleet as GM Shies Away

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

With nearly a third of its volume heading to businesses and government agencies, Ford is a bit of a fleet queen. However, the Blue Oval has been fairly uniform with General Motors in terms of volume when it came to selling its vehicles in bulk.

Not so this year.

General Motors is gradually pulling back from fleet sales, leaving FCA and Ford with a larger piece of the pie. GM’s total U.S. sales in November were up more than 10 percent from the previous year, giving it a larger share of the retail market and the confidence to abandon some of its fleet dependance. Meanwhile, Ford’s seems happy staying the course so long as the endeavor remains vaguely profitable.

“We don’t see an adjustment necessary in the daily rental,” Ford’s president of the Americas, Joe Hinrichs, told Automotive News. “We think where we’re at is pretty good and pretty balanced.”

Balanced is the operative word here. While Ford’s November fleet sales slipped a bit from 2015, total fleet volume is up 2 percent overall for the entire year. The government’s love affair with the Taurus and the commercial success of its vans and F-Series trucks is well-known, and those are some of the biggest contributing factors to that growth. Fleet vehicles now make up 30 percent of Ford’s volume, well above the 19 percent average for other major automakers.

“The rest of our fleet business is very healthy, and we’re growing it; we don’t see a reduction coming,” Hinrichs said.

Meanwhile, General Motors reduced sales to rental companies by 75,000 units in 2016, and wants to trim its fleet offerings even further next year. The theory is that GM can earn more by focusing more on retail and won’t suffer quite so egregiously the next time there is an economic downturn. FCA, which has long vowed to trim its fleet sales, made progress on that goal in October.

“Rental business isn’t bad business,” GM’s president of North America Alan Batey told AN last month. “But we don’t need to do it to run plants anymore, and it puts pressure on resale values.”

However, Ford isn’t going overboard with rental sales either. While it says it’s comfortable with its current fleet size, it hasn’t let rental volume balloon anywhere close to pre-recession numbers. Ford’s leadership understands that individual customer sales are more lucrative but it doesn’t seem keen to abandon what it has.

“Retail sales by their very nature tend to be [more profitable],” said Stephen Odell, Ford’s executive vice president of global marketing, sales and service. “Clearly, we wouldn’t participate if it didn’t make financial sense for us.”

“It’s all in balance, of course,” Hinrichs told Automotive News. “The daily rental business is very different than it was 10 years ago when we had a lot more volume and more pronounced on one or two nameplates. Now, we’re pretty balanced at a lot lower volume.”

[Image: Ford Motor Company]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 24 comments
  • Zip89123 Zip89123 on Dec 12, 2016

    So long as there is a profit, it's all good.

    • See 1 previous
    • Mopar4wd Mopar4wd on Dec 12, 2016

      GM profits are up at the moment and Ford down last I heard.

  • 86er 86er on Dec 12, 2016

    This is mostly tongue-in-cheek, but as the most "American" car company, does it only make sense that Ford has the highest fleet sales, in the way that Toyota makes cars that only serve the domestic market, like the Century?

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next