Critical Praise Ignored, Mazda 3 Sales Keep Falling

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

“It’s the one to have,” we said of the 2017 Mazda 3 on the last day of November, “but not the one you’ll buy.”

Pat TTAC on the back for such an accurate forecast, as the very next day, Mazda revealed that Americans acquired fewer Mazda 3s in November 2016 than at any point since January 2014, a 34-month low.

With the worst U.S. sales results in nearly three years, Mazda USA’s most popular car is now on track to potentially see annual volume fall to a decade low in 2016.

There’s nothing new about the American car buyer’s prerogative to avoid critical advice when it comes to Mazda’s compact sedan. The degree to which the Mazda-supporting suggestion is ignored, however, is, increasingly apparent.

Year-over-year, November 2016 sales plunged 14 percent to only 6,388 units.

U.S. sales of the Mazda 3 have now declined in ten of 2016’s eleven complete months, including each of the last seven.

Mazda’s share of the compact category is down to 4.6 percent through 2016’s first 11 months, down from 6.2 percent four years ago, when the previous-generation Mazda 3 was nearing the end of its tenure.

Eight compact cars — and 20 cars overall — sell more often in America than the Mazda 3. The 3’s 11-percent rate of decline is significantly worse than the compact category average; worse than the overall car market’s 9-percent fade, as well.

What’s the problem?

Besides the issues with the car, which the buying public clearly consider to be bigger issues than the automotive press believes, Mazda’s long-term plans do not support a short-term fix.

The issues a potential customer has with a car can be overcome. All it takes is cash on the hood.

Mazda doesn’t want to play that game.

“Mazda continues to maintain low incentives with our ‘Right Price Strategy’ that came into its own with the current-generation products,” Mazda spokesperson Jacob Brown told TTAC earlier this week.

Mazda has an issue with customer retention. To make matters worse, all Mazda needs to do is cut prices on the Mazda 3 in November, sell more cars, and drag down resale values for current owners of the Mazda 3.

But, Brown says, “We’re going to maintain our pricing strategy to bolster that value for our customers.”

Mazda also touts its knack for selling luxuriously equipped models, particularly those with a full suite of i-ActiveSense safety features. “Mazda has among the highest average transaction prices in the C-segment,” Brown says, while also noting the Mazda customer’s willingness to opt for that safety suite and a manual transmission.

“We found that many of our shoppers wanted both the manual transmission and all the top-level features without compromise,” Brown tells TTAC. “About 15 percent of Mazda 3 sales are with manual transmission, and many skew toward mid- or high-trims.”

Mazda is on track this year to sell fewer than 100,000 3s in the United States for the first time since 2009. Fortunately for Mazda, while the 3 operates in a sector that may offer little room for growth in the near future, the company is operating with increasing success on the crossover side of the ledger.

U.S. sales of the new Mazda CX-9 have risen 27 percent in the last six months, though it remains a niche model in its category. (Mazda sold 1,994 CX-9s in November; Toyota sold a record-high 21,241 Highlanders during the same period.)

Likewise, the Mazda CX-3 is a low-volume contender among subcompact crossovers — seven competitors are more common. But CX-3 sales have risen 25 percent over the last four months, the only months in which year-over-year figures are available. And two-thirds of the CX-3s sold in America leave the factory in higher-profit all-wheel-drive form.

Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-5 is on track for its fourth consecutive year of growth. (Mazda now sells more than 11 CX-5s for every 10 Mazda 3s.) Brown says, “The 2017 CX-5 will undoubtedly build on that momentum.”

If only the 3 had momentum to build upon, as well.

Timothy Cain is the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net, which obsesses over the free and frequent publication of U.S. and Canadian auto sales figures. Follow on Twitter @goodcarbadcar and on Facebook.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 105 comments
  • Fred0804 Fred0804 on Dec 16, 2016

    As of 12/14 We became a two Mazda 3 family. We have a 2013 touring sedan, never any issues avg. 37 mpg. But with the first grandchild on the way it was time to sell our MR2 spyder. A minivan or suv didn't thrill us. When I found a 2015 hatchback with 10k for under $14,000 we figured why not. The dealer left a lot to be desired, as i had the car detailed today. They seem to think slopping armour all everywhere and hosing it off is detailing. If it functions as well as the 2013 we will be pleased. P.S. we got the 2013 in 2014 with 4k also for under $14,000

  • Rolando Rolando on Dec 18, 2016

    Solution, jack it up an inch, call it the CX4, add $2000 to the price. Then sell a "lowered" Speed Model with the 2.5 Turbo!

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next