Volkswagen Figures It Can Keep Its Favorite Platform Around Basically Forever

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

In automotive terms, Volkswagen’s go-to MQB platform might end up having a lifespan somewhere between a Fox and a Panther.

Eager to stretch its meager dollars to Gumby-like proportions, the embattled automaker has announced that the platform underpinning most of its vehicles won’t die after two generations. Nah, let’s make it three, VW brand chief Herbert Diess said.

That means some vehicles, such as the stalwart Golf, will eventually ride on a platform old enough to drink in the United States.

According to Reuters, Diess told the German newspaper Boersen-Zeitung that keeping the MQB platform around for a little while longer — okay, a lot — should rake in the savings the company so desperately craves.

“In the past months we have worked on the cost side of MQB and made significant progress,” Diess said. “The MQB has high technical substance, so we can use it for the next two vehicle generations without further major investments.”

The modular platform, first used on the 2012 Golf, provides the backbone for VW’s small and midsize cars, crossovers and SUVs. The architecture also finds a home in some Audi small cars, as well as other VW Group products. Diess has said before that the MQB platform is a little too hoity toity for a volume compact like the Golf, hence the need to trim the expense.

Actually, there’s a laundry list of reasons why the automaker hit snooze on the MQB’s replacement. Volkswagen has promised to shave billions in expenses over the next few years as the company faces pressure on two fronts — paying off a Mt. Everest-sized pile of fines, settlements and litigation stemming from the diesel emissions scandal (the current tally stands at $16.5 billion in the U.S. alone), plus bringing to market a promised crop of electric vehicles.

Short of clipping coupons for Shake n’ Bake, cutting platform costs and building more utility vehicles is VW’s only fallback.

Speaking of the Golf, a refreshed version should appear any day now. The seventh generation model should soldier on in a lightly updated form for another few years.

[Image: Volkswagen of America]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 19 comments
  • Dan R Dan R on Nov 08, 2016

    It is only people who post here that worry about changes in suspension geometry. This is not rocket science, Surely, this all should have been worked out years ago. Only budgets prevents finessing the platforms.

  • Zackman Zackman on Nov 09, 2016

    I've heard this before - all complaints about an OEM keeping a platform around longer than some like. So what? On the surface, I see nothing but good reasons to keep an older platform around if it is a good one. That way, I assume continual improvements can be made to keep it current, thus making a car more reliable rather than constantly re-inventing the wheel, so to speak, as stated above.

  • Jeff JMII--If I did not get my Maverick my next choice was a Santa Cruz. They are different but then they are both compact pickups the only real compact pickups on the market. I am glad to hear that the Santa Cruz will have knobs and buttons on it for 2025 it would be good if they offered a hybrid as well. When I looked at both trucks it was less about brand loyalty and more about price, size, and features. I have owned 2 gm made trucks in the past and liked both but gm does not make a true compact truck and neither does Ram, Toyota, or Nissan. The Maverick was the only Ford product that I wanted. If I wanted a larger truck I would have kept either my 99 S-10 extended cab with a 2.2 I-4 5 speed or my 08 Isuzu I-370 4 x 4 with the 3.7 I-5, tow package, heated leather seats, and other niceties and it road like a luxury vehicle. I believe the demand is there for other manufacturers to make compact pickups. The proposed hybrid Toyota Stout would be a great truck. Subaru has experience making small trucks and they could make a very competitive compact truck and Subaru has a great all wheel drive system. Chevy has a great compact pickup offered in South America called the Montana which gm could be made in North America and offered in the US and Canada. Ram has a great little compact truck offered in South America as well.
  • Groza George I don’t care about GM’s anything. They have not had anything of interest or of reasonable quality in a generation and now solely stay on business to provide UAW retirement while they slowly move production to Mexico.
  • Arthur Dailey We have a lease coming due in October and no intention of buying the vehicle when the lease is up.Trying to decide on a replacement vehicle our preferences are the Maverick, Subaru Forester and Mazda CX-5 or CX-30.Unfortunately both the Maverick and Subaru are thin on the ground. Would prefer a Maverick with the hybrid, but the wife has 2 'must haves' those being heated seats and blind spot monitoring. That requires a factory order on the Maverick bringing Canadian price in the mid $40k range, and a delivery time of TBD. For the Subaru it looks like we would have to go up 2 trim levels to get those and that also puts it into the mid $40k range.Therefore are contemplating take another 2 or 3 year lease. Hoping that vehicle supply and prices stabilize and purchasing a hybrid or electric when that lease expires. By then we will both be retired, so that vehicle could be a 'forever car'. And an increased 'carbon tax' just kicked in this week in most of Canada. Prices are currently $1.72 per litre. Which according to my rough calculations is approximately $5.00 per gallon in US currency.Any recommendations would be welcomed.
  • Eric Wait! They're moving? Mexico??!!
  • GrumpyOldMan All modern road vehicles have tachometers in RPM X 1000. I've often wondered if that is a nanny-state regulation to prevent drivers from confusing it with the speedometer. If so, the Ford retro gauges would appear to be illegal.
Next