Toyota Needs a Certain Model in a Hurry, so Four Guys Are On It

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

That small-volume, regional roll-out of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles? Yeah, it’s just not doing it for Toyota. The automaker has let development of a fully-electric electric vehicle slide, and now it’s time to play catch-up.

But, rather than saddle the development of a non-hydrogen, non-hybrid green vehicle with the weight of a huge corporate bureaucracy, Toyota has chosen a different route in getting that all-important model to market.


A company within a company. At the table: four people with a mandate to deliver, and the sooner, the better. Call them Toyota’s A-Team. (E-Team?)

Toyota announced an in-house venture company today, run by an individual from each Toyota Group company. That includes Toyota Industries Corporation, Aisin Seiki Co., Ltd., Denso Corporation and TMC.

Describing it is a “virtual organization,” the automaker claims the four members will operate independently from those organizations. The group, company, organization — call it what you want — officially gets to work in December.

According to Toyota, the venture company’s “small organizational structure is meant to enable it to implement unconventional work processes, leading to accelerated project progress and, thus, fast-to-market products.”

The powers that be at the automaker admitted the company hadn’t covered all of its bases. Sure, the Prius hasn’t been ignored (though buyers aren’t giving it the love they once did), and there’s a plug-in Prime variant on the way, but the company’s strong focus on fuel-cell vehicles served to momentarily take its eye off the ball. For the record, the company stands by its pro-fuel cell stance, calling it the best all-around technology for the future.

However, all those pesky other companies and their EVs (existing or pending) tipped Toyota’s hand. It’s the government’s fault, too.

The automaker claims that “differing energy and infrastructure issues around the world and the rapid strengthening of regulations aimed at increasing the use of zero-emission vehicles have heightened the need for product lineups that can respond to various situations.”

What products can the world’s supposedly EV-hungry buyers expect? Toyota hasn’t said, though Japan’s Nikkei newspaper claims the company wants a vehicle with at least 186 miles of range by 2020. Even if the goal come to pass, expect a pack of Toyota’s competitors to cross the finish line first.

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 18 comments
  • NoDoors NoDoors on Nov 17, 2016

    Oil prices haven't helped spike interest in the Prius, but I can attest to the fact that the styling change has not helped at all.

  • Sportyaccordy Sportyaccordy on Nov 17, 2016

    I am not really seeing what all the fuss for range is about. Regardless of how much range you have, you're ultimately limited by charging stations. My commute is ~80 miles a day total, and my motorcycle gets about 140 to a tank comfortably. If I had something where I could just charge overnight and get ~100-120 miles of range and not have to drive a penalty box like a Leaf I'd consider it.

    • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Nov 17, 2016

      I didn't find the Leaf to be a penalty box, but maybe my standards are low. At 6'6", it fit me well. Granted, it's goofy-looking. The newest ones have a claimed 107 miles of range, but I wouldn't believe that would hold up in real-world driving in the winter after a few years, and maybe not even new.

  • MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
  • MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh [h3]Wake me up when it is a 1989 635Csi with a M88/3[/h3]
  • BrandX "I can charge using the 240V outlets, sure, but it’s slow."No it's not. That's what all home chargers use - 240V.
  • Jalop1991 does the odometer represent itself in an analog fashion? Will the numbers roll slowly and stop wherever, or do they just blink to the next number like any old boring modern car?
Next