Mysterious Lynk & Co Brand Teases a Real Car Ahead of Debut

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

When word of Lynk & Co first trickled out, the yet-to-be-revealed global car brand sounded exactly like a garden variety mobility company. Oh, there’ll be ride-sharing and apps and all that, we thought.

Then the brand revealed that an actual real, physical vehicle is on the way. Developed from Volvo’s Compact Modular Architecture (CMA) platform, the model will debut on October 20. And while we have some teaser images, the company — a subsidiary of Chinese Volvo parent company Geely — remains maddeningly vague about what its future.

Posting a story to Tictail (a social shopping destination for emerging brands, if you’re unaware), Lynk & Co wants you to forget everything you know about how cars are sold. And experienced, it seems.

For starters, the brand promises “the most connected car to date” and a share-based business model. Collaboration with the world’s top tech companies has created “a car built on an open digital platform,” a description that’s open to interpretation.

“With (Lynk & Co), we have created something bigger than just a car,” states David Green, the company’s chief digital officer. “We have created a digital platform for new thinking, for sharing and for collaboration, where only the imagination and creativity of all the bright minds out there will set the limits for how we can improve the use of cars and the experience of mobility.”

Maddening, but it gets better. Lynk & Co goes on to slam the automotive industry for its conservative thinking and lack of innovation. Certainly, there’s truth to this when it comes to business models, but no one could argue that automakers don’t refine their products to deliver what customers want.

Regardless, Lynk & Co promises a brand that “will evolve in the hands of its users.” The company’s senior vice president, Alain Visser, states, “To a large extent we have ignored the difference between the car as a mechanical product and the comprehensive experience.”

At this point, almost everything is on the table. Ride-hailing, car sharing, autonomous driving, disco on wheels, you name it.

If you’re one of those people who’s still interested in mechanical products, and you wouldn’t be reading TTAC if you weren’t, the company has provided images of a heavily obscured vehicle to pore over. Yes, it certainly looks like a subcompact crossover (one of our two guesses), but we’re not supposed to care about the vehicle. There’s experiences to be had.

[Images: Lynk & Co via Tictail]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 14 comments
  • IBx1 IBx1 on Oct 18, 2016

    Hey look, a knockoff Mini with serious "pedestrian safety" front end shapes.

  • Ryoku75 Ryoku75 on Oct 18, 2016

    Hey look another gray CUV, just what you need to demonstrate your individuality amongst the masses!

  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
  • Lou_BC "That’s expensive for a midsize pickup" All of the "offroad" midsize trucks fall in that 65k USD range. The ZR2 is probably the cheapest ( without Bison option).
  • Lou_BC There are a few in my town. They come out on sunny days. I'd rather spend $29k on a square body Chevy
  • Lou_BC I had a 2010 Ford F150 and 2010 Toyota Sienna. The F150 went through 3 sets of brakes and Sienna 2 sets. Similar mileage and 10 year span.4 sets tires on F150. Truck needed a set of rear shocks and front axle seals. The solenoid in the T-case was replaced under warranty. I replaced a "blend door motor" on heater. Sienna needed a water pump and heater blower both on warranty. One TSB then recall on spare tire cable. Has a limp mode due to an engine sensor failure. At 11 years old I had to replace clutch pack in rear diff F150. My ZR2 diesel at 55,000 km. Needs new tires. Duratrac's worn and chewed up. Needed front end alignment (1st time ever on any truck I've owned).Rear brakes worn out. Left pads were to metal. Chevy rear brakes don't like offroad. Weird "inside out" dents in a few spots rear fenders. Typically GM can't really build an offroad truck issue. They won't warranty. Has fender-well liners. Tore off one rear shock protector. Was cheaper to order from GM warehouse through parts supplier than through Chevy dealer. Lots of squeaks and rattles. Infotainment has crashed a few times. Seat heater modual was on recall. One of those post sale retrofit.Local dealer is horrific. If my son can't service or repair it, I'll drive 120 km to the next town. 1st and last Chevy. Love the drivetrain and suspension. Fit and finish mediocre. Dealer sucks.
  • MaintenanceCosts You expect everything on Amazon and eBay to be fake, but it's a shame to see fake stuff on Summit Racing. Glad they pulled it.
Next