Yes, Your Autopilot-Equipped Tesla Will Film a Crash

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

It’s common knowledge that Tesla vehicles store and transmit data back to the company’s Fremont, California home base, but a hacker working on a wrecked Model S just discovered something startling.

In an interview published by Inverse (h/t to Hybrid Cars), North Carolina computer programmer Jason Hughes claims that Tesla’s Autopilot system actually records video. While working on a center display unit from a wrecked Model S, Hughes found footage of the vehicle’s crash.

Hughes is a Tesla owner himself, and knew that Tesla collected data from its customers. He wanted to know exactly how much data a Tesla stores or transmits in the event of a crash. After purchasing the unit at auction, he wormed his way into the stored data.

“It’s not too terribly difficult,” Hughes told Inverse. “You have to basically gain root access to the MCU (Media Control Unit), and such. Tesla’s likely going to make that more difficult. I won’t say it’s simple, but it’s not impossible.”

Tinkering with a crashed @TeslaMotors Model S. camera stored these frames from the accident event. pic.twitter.com/HdUgVjJ6c3

— Jason Hughes (@wk057) September 13, 2016

Once inside, Hughes found low-quality black and white footage of the crash that sent the Tesla to the wrecker’s yard. The video, which he posted on Twitter, shows the vehicle driving towards an intersection and an amber light. A white Acura sedan appears on stage left, completing a turn. Then, we see nothing but crumpled hood.

Autopilot works via a forward facing camera, but until now it was believed to work on a moment-by-moment basis. That fact that it records and saves video, sending footage to the MCU for storage in the event of an airbag deployment (Hughes believes), is a capability Tesla hasn’t announced. Essentially, Autopilot can function as a dash cam.

Tesla once told TTAC that its data recording technology doesn’t meet the legal requirements of being called an Event Data Recorder (EDR). EDRs record a vehicle’s dynamic data (speed, etc.) just prior to, or during, a crash.

When asked how the automaker could say it doesn’t install an EDR despite claiming to collect pertinent vehicle data, Tesla responded, “We collect diagnostic data from Tesla vehicles in a responsible way that allows us to continue to improve the driver experience while also protecting our customers’ privacy.”

Hughes believes the Autopilot’s camera might not have recorded the fatal May crash of Joshua Brown’s Tesla Model S. It seems that images recorded by the vehicle’s camera are only sent to the MCU when the airbags deploy, and there’s up to 20 seconds of lag before the data transfer is complete.

In Brown’s crash, the timing and specifics of the incident are unusual. The Tesla’s roof was sheared off and the car traveled several hundred feet before impacting a pole — making it possible that the video didn’t make it the MCU.

The recently announced Version 8 of the company’s Autopilot adds radar to the vehicle’s imaging technology, removing some of the camera’s responsibility. It isn’t known if vehicles equipped with the Version 8 update will record video.

[Image: Tesla Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
15 of 59 comments
  • TrailerTrash TrailerTrash on Sep 15, 2016

    This is the world we now live in. Everything will be connected to clouds and manufacturers. Not saying it is naturally a bad thing, but like most tech, it is moving faster than our civilization can get its arms around and regulate. Never gonna improve as we see the glacier like movement of our congress here in the USA. It seems they move quickly for PC and empathy laws...but real actual needed regulation is mostly following the money. I have begun to see even kitchen appliances now requiring connections to manufacturers. Just hope the are not sneaking in cams. I would make a terrible Snowden leak video.

    • See 12 previous
    • Old Man Pants Old Man Pants on Sep 17, 2016

      @Old Man Pants Well, it won't matter in a few years anyhow, will it?

  • Cirats Cirats on Sep 16, 2016

    Interesting video. I only watched it a few times, but I think it is safe to say that the Tesla was really pushing that yellow light and/or was going way too fast. The light looks yellow in the very first frame and certainly is by the 2nd or 3rd, it seems like the truck well ahead of the Tesla stopped for the red (either that, or it magically turned into a small sedan and rounded the corner - where was that car hiding?), and the light is clearly red during the crash. I imagine the Acura driver figured the Tesla would stop for the red or greatly misjudged its speed, not that the Acura driver isn't at least somewhat at fault here, too.

  • Dwford I don't think price is the real issue. Plenty of people buy $40-50k gas vehicles every year. It's the functionality. People are worried about range and the ability to easily and quickly recharge. Also, if you want to buy an EV these days, you are mostly limited to midsize 5 passenger crossovers. How about some body style variety??
  • SCE to AUX The nose went from terrible to weird.
  • Chris P Bacon I'm not a fan of either, but if I had to choose, it would be the RAV. It's built for the long run with a NA engine and an 8 speed transmission. The Honda with a turbo and CVT might still last as long, but maintenance is going to cost more to get to 200000 miles for sure. The Honda is built for the first owner to lease and give back in 36 months. The Toyota is built to own and pass down.
  • Dwford Ford's management change their plans like they change their underwear. Where were all the prototypes of the larger EVs that were supposed to come out next year? Or for the next gen EV truck? Nowhere to be seen. Now those vaporware models are on the back burner to pursue cheaper models. Yeah, ok.
  • Wjtinfwb My comment about "missing the mark" was directed at, of the mentioned cars, none created huge demand or excitement once they were introduced. All three had some cool aspects; Thunderbird was pretty good exterior, let down by the Lincoln LS dash and the fairly weak 3.9L V8 at launch. The Prowler was super cool and unique, only the little nerf bumpers spoiled the exterior and of course the V6 was a huge letdown. SSR had the beans, but in my opinion was spoiled by the tonneau cover over the bed. Remove the cover, finish the bed with some teak or walnut and I think it could have been more appealing. All three were targeting a very small market (expensive 2-seaters without a prestige badge) which probably contributed. The PT Cruiser succeeded in this space by being both more practical and cheap. Of the three, I'd still like to have a Thunderbird in my garage in a classic color like the silver/green metallic offered in the later years.
Next