UAW Plant Chairman Confirms Ford Ranger, Bronco Revival in Trump Comments

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Will they, or won’t they? That’s the question nagging the minds of Ford Ranger and Bronco fans as they patiently await an official announcement from the automaker on the models’ return.

The Blue Oval will only confirm that two new products will take the place of the soon-to-depart Focus and C-Max at the Michigan Assembly Plant. However, in response to Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump’s recent comments about Ford, the plant’s UAW chairman identified those products to the Detroit Free Press.

As plant chairman for UAW Local 900, Bill Johnson represents workers at the Wayne, Michigan facility. He took exception to Trump’s recent claim that Ford was moving jobs south of the border to Mexico. Indeed, the automaker’s small car production is headed south — it’s the destination of choice for many automakers looking to free up domestic plants for higher-profit vehicles.

Still, Johnson argued, those Michigan jobs won’t disappear.

“We hate to see the products go to Mexico, but with the Ranger and the Bronco coming to Michigan Assembly that absolutely secures the future for our people a lot more than the Focus does,” Johnson told Freep.

Aha. Ford remains tight-lipped on future products, but we give thanks to those who blab.

The Focus and C-Max head to Mexico by 2018, at which point a pickup and SUV based on it will appear, likely as 2019 models. Ford promised the new product during last year’s UAW negotiations.

After vacating the North American market for years, the Ranger nameplate will return on a midsize pickup built on global architecture. That market segment has recently grown too hot for Ford to ignore.

While there’s no mystery as to the dimensions and layout of the Ranger, much speculation surrounds the Bronco. Will it be offered in a two-door? Can we expect a removable top? When O.J. gets out, will he return to the brand? Bronco fans, including TTAC’s managing editor, need to know.

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
8 of 115 comments
  • Lorenzo Lorenzo on Oct 01, 2016

    People expecting another Ranger-sized Ranger might be disappointed. The old Ranger was about the size of a 1955 F-100, but I suspect the new Ranger will be larger. The money is now in extended cab and four door pickups with options no one dreamed of in 1955 (or 1985).

    • JimZ JimZ on Oct 01, 2016

      I own an "old" (PN150) Ranger, and have driven the new one. Your size comparisons are grossly inaccurate.

  • Drzhivago138 Drzhivago138 on Oct 01, 2016

    I'll just leave this here for posterity: 2011 Ranger SuperCab/6' bed 4x4: Wheelbase: 125.9" Overall length: 203.6" Height: 67.7" Width: 71.3" T6 Ranger 4x4: WB: 127" (+0.87%) OAL: 211" (+3.63%, and 6.3 of those 7.4 extra inches went to front overhang) H: 71.5" (+5.61%, and also the dimension that contributes most to the perception of size) W: 72.8" (+2.10%) When the T6 Ranger comes over here, it'll almost certainly get a beefier-looking front end like the Colorado, which might add a little more front overhang.

    • See 4 previous
    • Scoutdude Scoutdude on Oct 02, 2016

      @Drzhivago138 It will almost certainly be in a similar size range, but not exactly the same.

  • AZFelix Hilux technical, preferably with a swivel mount.
  • ToolGuy This is the kind of thing you get when you give people faster internet.
  • ToolGuy North America is already the greatest country on the planet, and I have learned to be careful about what I wish for in terms of making changes. I mean, if Greenland wants to buy JDM vehicles, isn't that for the Danes to decide?
  • ToolGuy Once again my home did not catch on fire and my fire extinguisher(s) stayed in the closet, unused. I guess I threw my money away on fire extinguishers.(And by fire extinguishers I mean nuclear missiles.)
  • Carson D The UAW has succeeded in organizing a US VW plant before. There's a reason they don't teach history in the schools any longer. People wouldn't make the same mistakes.
Next