Why the Chevrolet Bolt Won't Wear a Union Jack Anytime Soon

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

The United Kingdom isn’t scared of electric vehicles, what with their high fuel prices and limited driving distances (when compared to the U.S.).

However, General Motors has developed a serious case of cold feet on the issue of launching a Vauxhall-branded Chevrolet Bolt, which could prove a decent sales performer. An all-electric range of 238 miles is impressive, so why is the General so shy?

According to Automotive News Europe, GM feels burned by the public’s failure to make the Vauxhall Ampera (a right-hand-drive version of the first-generation Chevrolet Volt) a sales success.

Sold under the British Vauxhall brand in the UK and Opel in continental Europe, the Ampera was a dud. In its best year, GM never sold more than 5,300 of them on the other side of the Atlantic, despite predicting sales twice that high.

The Bolt, due to reach U.S. dealers in limited numbers this December, goes on sale as the Opel Ampera-e in mainland Europe. While the first-generation Volt was designed with right-hand drive in mind, the new Bolt is a much more American affair. Switching the steering wheel to the starboard side is a financial gamble GM doesn’t want to take — at least, not just yet.

“It’s a more cautious approach,” a Opel brand spokesperson told ANE. “If you don’t want to lose too much money, we prefer not to make right-hand-drive yet. The decision was partly financial.”

Suddenly cautious, GM will play the waiting game to see how the Ampera-e performs in the rest of Europe. Since the launch of the original Ampera, the idea of an electric car has grown more familiar. Electric recharging infrastructure has proliferated, and continental automakers are eager to build EVs to fight Tesla on their home turf. EV sales, though still limited, are up 9.2 percent in August, year-over-year, according to UK industry association SMMT.

European regulators rate the Ampera-e’s range at 249 miles, or 400 kilometers. That places the northern England cities of Sheffield, Manchester and Liverpool within driving range of London.

Perhaps tellingly, GM hasn’t released sales projections for the Ampera-e.

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 33 comments
  • Johnster Johnster on Sep 15, 2016

    The first generation Volt/Ampera was ugly and doomed to fail for that reason! In contrast, the second-generation Volt/Ampera is reasonably attractive, although it has a very strong resemblance to the Chevy Cruze on which it is based. GM UK (Vauxhall) is being short-sighted in not bringing in the Bolt.

  • HotPotato HotPotato on Sep 16, 2016

    The UK in general and London in particular have good incentives to get people into electric cars, including up to 5000 pounds (~$6700) up-front toward purchase, no VED vehicle tax, exemption from congestion charges, free or reduced price parking in many boroughs, grants of up to 75% to install a home charge point, and the Source London network of 1400 charge points. The countryside is trickier as infrastructure is thinner, but let's be honest, the UK's not THAT big, and unless you're on an M road, you can't go very fast. I just spent several days driving the length of the Welsh coastline and then over into England in a Nissan Qashqai. Like most regular-people Euro/UK cars, it was a diesel with modest acceleration but very impressive MPG--nevertheless, the price of motor fuel made fill-ups painful. Would drivers find it cheaper to run on electrons? Would drivers enjoy doing 0-60 in 6.5 seconds rather than 14? I imagine the answer is "yes." What's more, the Bolt's tidy width and extremely strong merging acceleration would suit the country's narrow roadways and short merging lanes, and its nimble handling and quasi-CUV shape would suit UK buyer preferences. So what's the problem? By sticking with right-hand drive in a mostly left-hand drive world, the UK has ensured it will get cool cars from abroad last, if at all.

    • See 1 previous
    • HotPotato HotPotato on Sep 16, 2016

      @RobertRyan There's something comforting about seeing loads of gas stations even when you don't need one, because *just in case you did*... So yes, I'd feel uncomfortable road-tripping through areas with more sheep than people, thinking that a charger might be an hour's drive away, even if rationally I knew I had ample range to get there and far beyond. I wonder what the tipping point for frequency of chargepoints is, to get over that psychological hurdle. Back in the 1920s, how many fuel stations had to spring up in a person's area before they'd consider buying their first gasoline powered vehicle? I wonder. As an Aussie you won't like this, but I still think right-hand drive/left-hand traffic is an anachronism that needlessly adds cost and complexity to export---only 10% of the world's countries use it, mostly island nations where land borders with LHD countries won't be an issue. Some say it's chosen to enhance safety because many people are right eye dominant, but archaeological excavations of double-track roadways in Swindon suggest another reason for this convention among current and former British subjects: ancient Romans in what is now England drove their chariots on that side!

  • Jalop1991 Is this the beginning of the culmination of a very long game by Tesla?Build stuff, prove that it works. Sell the razors, sure, but pay close attention to the blades (charging network) that make the razors useful. Design features no one else is bothering with, and market the hell out of them.In other words, create demand for what you have.Then back out of manufacturing completely, because that's hard and expensive. License your stuff to legacy carmakers that (a) are able to build cars well, and (b) are too lazy to create the things and customer demand you did.Sit back and cash the checks.
  • Buickman more likely Dunfast.
  • Chris P Bacon "Dealership". Are these traditional franchised dealers, or is Vinfast selling direct?
  • Chris P Bacon Full self driving is a fraud. Even aircraft "autopilot" requires pilot interaction, attention, and most importantly of all, training is required. We've already seen accidents by idiots who think they don't need to interact with their Tesla. The system gets confused by simple lane markings, and there are many more variables driving down the street than there is in a jet aircraft.
  • ToolGuy I read through the Tesla presentation deck last night and here is my take (understanding that it was late and I ain't too bright):• Tesla has realized it has a capital outlay issue and has put the 'unboxed' process in new facilities on hold and will focus on a 'hybrid' approach cranking out more product from the existing facilities without as much cost reduction but saving on the capital.They still plan to go 'all the way' (maximum cost reduction) with the robo thing but that will be in the future when presumably more cash is freed up.
Next