Audi Chief Knew About Defeat Device, Say Witnesses, as Automaker Suspends Tech Boss

by Steph Willems

Published: September 20th, 2016

audi chief knew about defeat device say witnesses as automaker suspends tech boss

Who knew what, and when? That’s what investigators at U.S. law firm Jones Day plan to find out when it puts Audi chief Rupert Stadler on the hot seat in its investigation of the Volkswagen diesel scandal.

According to a report in Germany’s Der Spiegel, witnesses at the company claim Stadler knew about the diesel deception as early as 2010, Bloomberg reports.

The news comes as another German publication reports the suspension of Audi technical development boss Stefan Knirsch.

Jones Day was hired by Volkswagen to investigate the company after the scandal became public. During its probe, witnesses reportedly came forward claiming Stadler was privy to knowledge about the emissions-cheating engines.

Joining Audi AG in 1990, Stadler has served as chairman of its board of management since 2007. He joined Volkswagen Group’s board of management in 2010. In becoming Audi chief, Stadler replaced Martin Winterkorn, who became CEO of Volkswagen. Winterkorn resigned that position shortly after the scandal broke.

Current VW executives have already felt the heat from investigators. In July, German prosecutors opened an investigation into VW brand chief Herbert Diess.

Shortly after Winterkorn resigned, Ulrich Hackenberg was forced out of his role as technical development chief. His successor, Stefan Knirsch, will likely face the same fate. According to German publication Bild am Sonntag, Knirsch will be relieved of his duties this week after investigators received information showing he knew about the defeat devices at an early date. Knirsch reportedly provided a false affidavit to investigators.

Defeat devices were installed on Audi 3.0-liter diesel V6 engines at the same time as Volkswagen’s 2.0-liter diesel four-cylinders. Their discovery led to millions of recalls, including the buyback of 475,000 2.0-liter vehicles in the United States. A total of 85,000 3.0-liter vehicles, mostly Audis, are also sidelined in the U.S., with the automaker desperately looking for a workable fix.

Volkswagen has until late October to submit a fix to regulators, and has already started settlement talks.

#Audi #LawAndOrder #RupertStadler #StefanKnirsch #Volkswagen #VwDieselScandal

Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments

Join the conversation

7 of 12 comments

Stingray65 on Sep 20, 2016

I suspect the whole industry knew about this. They tear-down each other's vehicles to see what makes them tick, and they must have been extra curious about how VW was able to meet tough diesel emission standards without expensive urea injection systems. I am sure they found out that cheating was the method VW chose, and that this information ran right up the chain among all VW's competitors and the automotive suppliers. I'm a bit surprised no one blew the whistle years ago, but suspect that the reason is that every firm has some dirt on all their competitors.

Like Reply
- See 4 previous
- George B on Sep 20, 2016
  
  stingray65, I also suspect that the whole industry had clues that Volkswagen was cheating on Diesel emissions in the US, but their "Clean Diesel" models weren't selling in large enough numbers to justify whistle blowing. Consumer interest in diesel vehicles in the US took a big hit 10 years ago with the huge price increase of ultra-low sulfur diesel fuel.
  
  Like
- Lack Thereof on Sep 20, 2016
  
  I suspect someone DID blow the whistle, but did so anonymously and off the record. Competing diesel manufacturers who were playing by the book knew what VW was doing and wanted the playing field leveled too much to keep quiet. It's just too convenient that CARB and WVU decided to examine VW diesels when they did. Someone whispered in their ear what to look for.
  
  Like
- Scoutdude on Sep 20, 2016
  
  @Lack Thereof This whole thing started in Europe by a group that wanted Euro diesels to be as clean as US diesels. So they did road testing of Euro diesels and then came to the US to test the diesels here so they could go back home and say why are our diesels so dirty when they are much cleaner in the US.
  
  Like
- Tosh on Sep 20, 2016
  
  honor among thieves
  
  Like
- Eric M on Sep 21, 2016
  
  I have a friend who works in the small boat industry. They have suspected for several years that VW's diesels were cheating. The comment made to me was "How in the world are those engines passing federal highway emissions?". We now know the answer.
  
  Like
APaGttH on Sep 20, 2016

Das noose tightens a bit more...

Like Reply

Recent Comments

SaulTigh Unless we start building nuclear plants and beefing up the grid, this drive to electrification (and not just cars) will be the destruction of modern society. I hope you love rolling blackouts like the US was some third world failed state. You don't support 8 billion people on this planet without abundant and relatively cheap energy.So no, I don't want an electric car, even if it's cheap.
3-On-The-Tree Lou_BCone of many cars I sold when I got commissioned into the army. 1964 Dodge D100 with slant six and 3 on the tree, 1973 Plymouth Duster with slant six, 1974 dodge dart custom with a 318. 1990 Bronco 5.0 which was our snowboard rig for Wa state and Whistler/Blackcomb BC. Now :my trail rigs are a 1985 Toyota FJ60 Land cruiser and 86 Suzuki Samurai.
RHD They are going to crash and burn like Country Garden and Evergrande (the Chinese property behemoths) if they don't fix their problems post-haste.
Golden2husky The biggest hurdle for us would be the lack of a good charging network for road tripping as we are at the point in our lives that we will be traveling quite a bit. I'd rather pay more for longer range so the cheaper models would probably not make the cut. Improve the charging infrastructure and I'm certainly going to give one a try. This is more important that a lowish entry price IMHO.
Add Lightness I have nothing against paying more to get quality (think Toyota vs Chryco) but hate all the silly, non-mandated 'stuff' that automakers load onto cars based on what non-gearhead focus groups tell them they need to have in a car. I blame focus groups for automatic everything and double drivetrains (AWD) that really never gets used 98% of the time. The other 2% of the time, one goes looking for a place to need it to rationanalize the purchase.