McLaren Refutes Reports of Apple Talks, Possible Takeover

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems
British supercar maker and racecar developer McLaren Technology Group has refuted a report claiming it is talks with tech giant Apple ahead of a possible takeover.A McLaren spokesperson has told Street Insider that the earlier report, published in the Financial Times, is incorrect.“We can confirm McLaren is not in discussion with Apple in respect of any potential investment,” the spokesperson told Street Insider.The initial report drew from three sources with alleged knowledge of the company’s actions, which gives it significant credence. FT reporter Tim Bradshaw has tweeted that the publication stands behind its story, despite McLaren’s statement.Those sources told the Financial Times that talks between the two companies have been ongoing, with Apple angling for either a full takeover or a strategic investment. The talks reportedly began “several months” ago.A takeover or partnership between the two companies makes sense, as McLaren is a technology powerhouse. Its in-house designed electronic control units are standard equipment on all Formula One entries, while its hybridization technology and work with carbon fiber construction is cutting edge.Meanwhile, Apple’s shadowy self-driving car program has undergone significant changes in scope, with an emphasis placed on technology development. Apple’s interest in McLaren would be understandable.The sources told FT that McLaren would be worth $1.3 billion to $1.9 billion in the event of a takeover. The company posted a $27 million net profit in 2015, from $617 million in revenue. It also recently pledged to invest $1.3 billion into research and development over the next six years.(Note: this post has been updated to reflect new information)
Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 43 comments
  • Tifighter Tifighter on Sep 21, 2016

    This story is so bat-sh_t crazy, with no obvious reasons for either party to consider it, that it might actually be true. I mean, why make this up?

  • Vulpine Vulpine on Sep 21, 2016

    Sponsorship. We get to see the Apple name on the sides of Formula 1 and LeMans cars again.

  • Varezhka Maybe the volume was not big enough to really matter anyways, but losing a “passenger car” for a mostly “light truck” line-up should help Subaru with their CAFE numbers too.
  • Varezhka For this category my car of choice would be the CX-50. But between the two cars listed I’d select the RAV4 over CR-V. I’ve always preferred NA over small turbos and for hybrids THS’ longer history shows in its refinement.
  • AZFelix I would suggest a variation on the 'fcuk, marry, kill' game using 'track, buy, lease' with three similar automotive selections.
  • Formula m For the gas versions I like the Honda CRV. Haven’t driven the hybrids yet.
  • SCE to AUX All that lift makes for an easy rollover of your $70k truck.
Next