Ace of Base: Mazda CX-3 Sport

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Sometimes a manufacturer churns out a base trim that is — all things considered — the primo choice for that particular model. Here’s an example.

Yes, yes, yes. I know. Another bloody crossover. But before you scroll down to re-read one of Jack’s breathless exploits or Sajeev’s rants on automotive style, permit me the following: what would happen if Mazda spent all its R&D budget shoehorning a rotary engine into the upcoming MX-5 RF?

They’d go bankrupt, that’s what would happen. While the keyboard warriors inhabiting dusty corners of the internet would undoubtedly put down their stale popcorn long enough to cheer, the rest of the world (y’know, those of us who actually buy cars) would read the rotary reviews with interest then promptly stampede to a competing dealer to sign on the dotted line for something with a high beltline and a modicum of practicality.

In base Sport trim, the CX-3 stickers at a take-out dinner under $20,000, yet sees fit to include such niceties as air conditioning, a seven-inch touch screen billboard, and a helpful backup camera. All-wheel drive is a $1,250 option and wholly unnecessary unless your backyard decor includes — as mine did for eighteen years — polar bears and a couple of icebergs. An angry version of Mazda’s KODO design language makes the base CX-3 one of the more stylish options in this category to this jaundiced eye, particularly when slathered in a few gallons of $0 Dynamic Blue Mica paint.

The SKYACTIV-G 2.0-liter engine sees fit to channel a pleasingly symmetrical 146 horsepower and 146 pounds-feet of torque. Acceleration is helped by the CX-3’s diet of Lean Cuisines, contributing to curb weight well under 3,000 pounds, 200 lbs less than a base Jeep Renegade. Mazda’s six-speed auto is the sole transmission of choice but manages to avoid any sort of comparisons to slushboxes of yore. The suspension is firm enough to recall Mazda’s core values of sportiness and a rip to the redline will help you forget, if only for a moment, that you got talked into buying a subcompact crossover.

Sure, our ME wasn’t totally enamoured with this thing, but he’s generally delusional (as proven by his decisions about moving day). I will agree the CX-3’s value proposition loses its luster as it zoom-zooms its way into the high $20,000 bracket, and rear seat space is poor for anyone past the fifth grade. At the instant ramen end of the subcompact crossover scale, however, the base CX-3 checks many of the right boxes. Now, do the sensible thing and go buy a Mazda3 hatchback instead.

Not every base model has aced it. The ones which have? They help make our automotive landscape a lot better. Any others you’d like to see in our series? Let us know in the comments. Naturally, feel free to eviscerate our selections.

The model above is shown with American options and is priced in Freedom Dollars. As always, your dealer will probably sell for less.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 36 comments
  • APaGttH APaGttH on Sep 14, 2016

    One thing Mazda has had right since there has been a Mazda is their paint colors. Mazda has amazing color availability on their vehicles. The only two companies that do red better is Porsche and Ferrari - for one example.

    • Drzhivago138 Drzhivago138 on Sep 14, 2016

      Except you can only get a CX-5 Sport (the only trim available with a stick) in black and gray.

  • Funky Funky on Sep 15, 2016

    The CX-3 isn't a bad vehicle. The driving dynamics are not as impressive/fun as the CX-5, but it is a smaller and less expensive vehicle. The interior design, in the GT trim, appears to be high-end and it looks nicely modern. I really like the round air vents. The front seats are comfortable, with proper side bolstering. At higher revs, the engine note is very noticeable and sounds proper for a small "driver oriented" vehicle. It is very quick to start at red lights. The back seats are useable if the front seats are adjusted to the middle front/back adjustment. And, overall, it is a decent and relatively inexpensive compact 4WD hatchback. I recently had an opportunity to spend some time driving one of these. If this is your sort of thing, I'd recommend one. And, because I was impressed with it, I bought one for myself (a new 2017 GT which hasn't yet been delivered to me). I'll keep you posted on my (and my kid's...who recently started driving) continued experience with it. I hope that it proves to be a good vehicle for my family to share.

  • ChristianWimmer This would be pretty cool - if it kept the cool front end of the standard/AMG G-Class models. The front ends of current Mercedes’ EVs just look lame.
  • Master Baiter The new Model 3 Performance is actually tempting, in spite of the crappy ergonomics. 0-60 in under 3 seconds, which is faster than a C8 Corvette, plus it has a back seat and two trunks. And comparable in weight to a BMW M3.
  • SCE to AUX The Commies have landed.
  • Arthur Dailey The longest we have ever kept a car was 13 years for a Kia Rondo. Only ever had to perform routine 'wear and tear' maintenance. Brake jobs, tire replacements, fluids replacements (per mfg specs), battery replacement, etc. All in all it was an entirely positive ownership experience. The worst ownership experiences from oldest to newest were Ford, Chrysler and Hyundai.Neutral regarding GM, Honda, Nissan (two good, one not so good) and VW (3 good and 1 terrible). Experiences with other manufacturers were all too short to objectively comment on.
  • MaintenanceCosts Two-speed transfer case and lockable differentials are essential for getting over the curb in Beverly Hills to park on the sidewalk.
Next