Volvo Partners With Uber, Unleashes Self-Driving XC90s in Pittsburgh

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Volvo is partnering with ride-hailing service Uber, a $300 million deal expected to spawn a fleet of self-driving vehicles on U.S. roads.

Both companies plan to develop their own autonomous technology using a Volvo “base” vehicle, but Pittsburgh will see a crop of self-driving Swedes by the end of the year, Automotive News reports.

As part of the agreement, Uber will outfit 100 XC90 plug-in SUVs with technology created at its Pittsburgh technology center. The company will test a slew of gadgetry — cameras, sensors, software, radar and lidar — as the vehicles drive themselves through the city. A new vehicle, built on Volvo’s modular Scalable Product Architecture (SPA), will test next-generation technologies at some point in the future.

Uber’s goal is to eventually do away with its drivers. Passengers would be picked up by a fleet of self-driving vehicles and dropped off at a programmed destination. No more small talk about the weather with a complete stranger.

Earlier this year, Fortune reported that Uber was using a specially outfitted Ford Fusion to map the city’s roads and test autonomous technology, but the automaker denied any partnership with the company.

The XC90s roaming around Pittsburg won’t be empty — due to regulations and safety concerns, Uber engineers will ride shotgun to keep an eye on things. Volvo plans to use the same vehicle for its own autonomous driving program.

“The alliance marks the beginning of what both companies view as a longer term industrial partnership,” the automaker said in a statement.

In a statement delivered to Automotive News, Uber said the company has the support of city leaders and law enforcement, otherwise the self-driving project would be a non-starter.

[Image: Volvo Car Corporation}

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 31 comments
  • Threeer Threeer on Aug 18, 2016

    So will riders have the ability to opt out of the ride (or at least be notified that the car being sent is sans-driver?) if it is an unmanned vehicle? And has Uber come out directly stating that they want to do away with the entire network of manned vehicles? I don't want to come off as too much "get off my lawn" here, but I'm not sure we're quite ready for completely autonomous vehicles, especially as long as there are manned vehicles still on the road.

    • See 2 previous
    • Orenwolf Orenwolf on Aug 18, 2016

      @mopar4wd Indeed!

  • Chocolatedeath Chocolatedeath on Aug 18, 2016

    I just love these forums..lol..

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next