Mercedes-Benz Canada Has No Timeline For C-Class Wagon Arrival

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

Mercedes-Benz Canada’s surprise reveal of a diesel-powered C-Class Wagon at January’s Montreal International Auto Show has not been followed by the car’s arrival in Mercedes-Benz showrooms. Nor is it about to be.

Only yesterday we listed the C-Class Wagon, intended to go on sale in Canada as the C300d 4Matic, as one of eight cars Canadians have access to that Americans don’t. Recognizing that the 2017 C-Class Wagon wasn’t yet featured on the company’s Canadian website, our curiosity was further piqued by TTAC reader bortlicenseplate, who suggested that, “the C-Class Wagon is no longer Canada-bound.”

bortlicenseplate is mostly right. Mercedes-Benz Canada still intends to import the C300d 4Matic Wagon, but Mercedes-Benz Canada spokesperson JoAnne Caza told TTAC yesterday, “We’re still waiting for certification.”

That certification isn’t a Canadian process steered by Natural Resources Canada’s Office of Energy Efficiency, but one that’s farmed out to CARB and the EPA, Caza says.

As a result, there’s essentially no timeline for the C300d 4Matic Wagon’s Canadian on-sale date, as the same 2.1-liter diesel that was set to be the only powerplant in Canada’s C-Class Wagon lineup is likely delayed in the United States until at least the halfway point of next year.

“But this is certainly subject to change,” Mercedes-Benz spokesperson Rob Moran told Automotive News late last month.

Increased attention has been paid to diesel emissions since Volkswagen’s scandal broke news 11 months ago. The diesel awaiting placement in Mercedes-Benz Canada’s C300d 4Matic Wagon is the same 2.1-liter powerplant under the hood of the previous-generation E250 Bluetec.

Certifying the 2.1-liter four-cylinder for use one year later in a different car is clearly not an automatic transaction. As a result, Canadians waiting for one of the eight cars Americans can’t buy must wait a while longer. Potentially much longer.

The C-Class Wagon’s Audi A4 Avant rival is marketed in North America only as the elevated and cladded A4 Allroad. We don’t expect the BMW 3 Series Wagon to survive following the current generation’s run.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 18 comments
  • Sportyaccordy Sportyaccordy on Aug 17, 2016

    To me, the GLC retains ~95% of the C-Class achingly good looks while having much more utility. It's like getting rejected by a hot girl and ending up with her not quite as but still hot sister who's much more fun to hang out with. Fact of the matter is the C-Class wagon's eye-widening beauty comes at a price. For the extra $2000 or so UK prices indicate I'd rather have the GLC anyway.

    • See 1 previous
    • Maymar Maymar on Aug 18, 2016

      More fun to hang out with? I don't see how you get that, even if it's an effective substitute. That said, the GLC is an awful consolation prize - it's just so basic, as the kids are saying these days. Whether or not the C Wagon is inherently superior, we lose by losing that sort of diversity, where we have a choice of roughly a thousand crossovers and 3 real station wagons. And as much as you constantly defend CUVs, they are not a one-size-fits-all solution. As much as the conventional car market is shrinking, there are things they legitimately do better (and not just in a Jalopnik delusional full oppo everywhere sort of way), as evidenced by the crossover sedan failing magnificently every single time someone tries it. I have 40+ years of car buying left, and i don't look forward to a future of motorized Kate Spade bags on stilts.

  • Wunsch Wunsch on Aug 24, 2016

    When I was shopping earlier this year, I stopped by the local Mercedes dealer to ask about the wagon. They seemed to think it would be coming "soon" and that it would come in both diesel and gas form. The lack of heated rear seats in the C-Class was a deal-breaker for me (such a bizarre feature to leave out of a supposed luxury car), so it didn't bother me too much that they never did get back to me to say when I'd actually be able to order one. For the record, I've bought a 3-series wagon, complete with heated rear seats.

  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
  • Lou_BC "That’s expensive for a midsize pickup" All of the "offroad" midsize trucks fall in that 65k USD range. The ZR2 is probably the cheapest ( without Bison option).
  • Lou_BC There are a few in my town. They come out on sunny days. I'd rather spend $29k on a square body Chevy
  • Lou_BC I had a 2010 Ford F150 and 2010 Toyota Sienna. The F150 went through 3 sets of brakes and Sienna 2 sets. Similar mileage and 10 year span.4 sets tires on F150. Truck needed a set of rear shocks and front axle seals. The solenoid in the T-case was replaced under warranty. I replaced a "blend door motor" on heater. Sienna needed a water pump and heater blower both on warranty. One TSB then recall on spare tire cable. Has a limp mode due to an engine sensor failure. At 11 years old I had to replace clutch pack in rear diff F150. My ZR2 diesel at 55,000 km. Needs new tires. Duratrac's worn and chewed up. Needed front end alignment (1st time ever on any truck I've owned).Rear brakes worn out. Left pads were to metal. Chevy rear brakes don't like offroad. Weird "inside out" dents in a few spots rear fenders. Typically GM can't really build an offroad truck issue. They won't warranty. Has fender-well liners. Tore off one rear shock protector. Was cheaper to order from GM warehouse through parts supplier than through Chevy dealer. Lots of squeaks and rattles. Infotainment has crashed a few times. Seat heater modual was on recall. One of those post sale retrofit.Local dealer is horrific. If my son can't service or repair it, I'll drive 120 km to the next town. 1st and last Chevy. Love the drivetrain and suspension. Fit and finish mediocre. Dealer sucks.
Next