Hitting the Gym Won't Restore Your Masculinity, but Buying a Six-cylinder Ford Will

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

It’s hot, it’s the middle of summer, and the beach beckons from afar. But if stripping down around a bunch of muscle-bound surfer hunks causes bouts of anxiety and insecurity, fear not. Ford Motor Company has a solution.

The great thing about 1960s car commercials is the complete disregard for political correctness and subtlety when it comes to stroking a driver’s ego. It’s hard to imagine a world where manufacturers so nakedly sold a lifestyle by pumping out vast quantities of innuendo in a bid to lure buyers into dealerships. Trigger warning!

Hocking a menacing GTO or Charger is easy, but what if you had to sell a low-priced base model in the ’60s? Easy. Stick with the plan.

To get up-and-coming Boomers (who just landed their first real job) to buy 1965 Mustang convertibles, Ford riffed on the old Charles Atlas body-building ads. The result? This commercial, in which young Albert’s teenage girlfriend laments, “Every time I went to the beach with Albert, some big muscle guy was always kicking sand in his face. It made me so mad. He tried all the exercises, went through the diets… I wonder what ever happened to him.”

Cue the sultry “Mrs. Robinson” voice. That pale, wimpy guy you knew from the beach still has the body of a budding accountant, but his new Ford just delivered a heaping dose of confidence.

“Albert’s a Mustanger now,” says the voice-over, as if speaking naughtily to a friend. “Nothing soft about this car, except the all-vinyl interior and the carpeting.”

Wait – what, huh? A nation of male television viewers slowly rouses themselves from their slumber.

“With a big, 200 cubic-inch strong-arm six, he’s got a tough, new kind of action.”

A nation’s drinks collectively spill on the sofa. Yes, that’s the Ford Falcon’s base engine, many think. But now it sounds sexy and compelling and I’d step over my neighbour’s body for one taste of –

“Put a few kicks in your life – take a new Mustang out for a little road work,” says the velvet-voiced lady, as Albert suggestively works the shift lever in his new ‘stang, kicking sand into the face of a surfer with his rear wheels.

You can just imagine Albert’s thoughts: The punk probably works in a burger stand – he’ll never know the thrill of Mustang life. Thank you, capitalism. Just try getting one of these babies in Russia. I dare you.

Just to make sure the audience — now sitting rigidly upright while pondering their life’s many mistakes — gets the message, the breathy voice-over repeats the words “Mustang…Mustang….. Mustang,” for their benefit.

It’s seductive, exploitative, and very lucrative. Ford sold 559,500 Mustangs in 1965, and made its entry-level 120 hp straight-six seem like the heart of an untamed, primal warrior. For just $2,614, a glamorous — and quite sexy — middle-class lifestyle awaits, or so the ad would have your believe.

These days, all we’re allowed to do is refine our or slyly cheat our insurers (thanks to automatic braking). The ’60s, for better or for worse, are truly over.

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 135 comments
  • Corey Lewis Corey Lewis on Aug 08, 2016

    I'm struggling to find the point of this article. The comments were by and large, typical. If the man had any sense of self worth he'd get a V8 Oldsmobile coupe and skip the V6 Stang. He was too old for beach nonsense. Get a briefcase.

  • MazdaThreeve MazdaThreeve on Aug 08, 2016

    My folks grabbed a 65' with a 289 V8 back in the nineties. Bought from the couple that had purchased it new. Good lord, I loved that car. Someday, I'll have one of my own.

    • Skor Skor on Aug 08, 2016

      The Falcon based Stangs with the 289 were a good combination of weight and power, even if they didn't turn or stop very well, but then again, what American cars of that era did?

  • Dwford Ford's management change their plans like they change their underwear. Where were all the prototypes of the larger EVs that were supposed to come out next year? Or for the next gen EV truck? Nowhere to be seen. Now those vaporware models are on the back burner to pursue cheaper models. Yeah, ok.
  • Wjtinfwb My comment about "missing the mark" was directed at, of the mentioned cars, none created huge demand or excitement once they were introduced. All three had some cool aspects; Thunderbird was pretty good exterior, let down by the Lincoln LS dash and the fairly weak 3.9L V8 at launch. The Prowler was super cool and unique, only the little nerf bumpers spoiled the exterior and of course the V6 was a huge letdown. SSR had the beans, but in my opinion was spoiled by the tonneau cover over the bed. Remove the cover, finish the bed with some teak or walnut and I think it could have been more appealing. All three were targeting a very small market (expensive 2-seaters without a prestige badge) which probably contributed. The PT Cruiser succeeded in this space by being both more practical and cheap. Of the three, I'd still like to have a Thunderbird in my garage in a classic color like the silver/green metallic offered in the later years.
  • D Screw Tesla. There are millions of affordable EVs already in use and widely available. Commonly seen in Peachtree City, GA, and The Villages, FL, they are cheap, convenient, and fun. We just need more municipalities to accept them. If they'll allow AVs on the road, why not golf cars?
  • ChristianWimmer Best-looking current BMW in my opinion.
  • Analoggrotto Looks like a cheap Hyundai.
Next