Borrowing Binge: Auto Loan Debt Hits a Record High

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

With memories of the 2008 financial meltdown still fresh, American consumers aren’t borrowing wildly anymore — except when it comes to cars and credit card purchases.

As of the end of June, car buyers racked up the highest auto loan debt in U.S. history — $1.1 trillion, according to a quarterly report from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Also on the rise? Credit risk.

The second quarter rise in vehicle loans was enough to slightly boost household debt levels, despite a decline in mortgage debt and — for the first time — a reduction in student loan debt. A hunger for new vehicles fueled a multi-year U.S. car-buying spree, so a spike in borrowing isn’t unexpected. Still, there’s risk in those numbers.

Depending on what predictions you listen to, new vehicles sales could soon decline, or hit a plateau. (Recent sales figures seem to show the market flattening-out.) Still, year-over-year sales growth in the past several years was massive. Low lending rates helped spur that growth, with auto loan rates now nearing record lows.

In the second quarter of this year, car buyers added $32 billion (three percent) to the auto loan debt pile. That tally is $97 billion higher than a year ago, enough to spook regulators.

Last month, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which oversees the large banks, issued a warning. Credit risk is on the rise in the auto lending sector, it said in a report, a problem made worse by indirect loans accessed through dealers. Competition between banks could boost the risk further.

The report stated that “because of notable and unprecedented growth” across all types of lenders, “some banks have responded with less stringent underwriting standards.”

It’s not a new message. Last October, the OCC’s Thomas Curry said that some activity in the auto loan sector “reminds me of what happened in mortgage-backed securities in the run-up to the crisis,” according to the Wall Street Journal.

Needless worry, or premonition of another credit bubble? Time will tell. In the mean time, don’t worry, and enjoy the new car. They cost a lot of money.

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 88 comments
  • Chris8017 Chris8017 on Aug 10, 2016

    By and large your typical American is a debt slave. Credit/debt should never be used to buy ANY non-essential good...i.e. large TVs, expensive cars, WORTHLESS college degrees, etc. Half of my family are debt slaves. I have a family member who makes six figures who financed a COUCH because they live paycheck to paycheck. I have another family member whose combined income is $250k who has all the toys you can imagine but couldn't afford to put a new roof on his house so he lost sleep worrying about how he was going to pay to fix the leaks. It's quite amusing to watch - being a weirdo who has 0 debt, buys things in cash and eats PB&J for lunch. I'm not a holier than thou type and I never lecture my family on how to spend their own money - I say live and let live. I prefer peace of mind and not having to excessively worry about money to having the latest and greatest. Just don't come crying to me or seize my retirement savings because you were too reckless to use your brain. The discipline it takes to live below your means requires foresight and putting aside your ego.

    • See 2 previous
    • 28-Cars-Later 28-Cars-Later on Aug 10, 2016

      @Lou_BC I don't think the lesson is to not save, even if that's what "they" would prefer, it is diversify. Wine, art, real estate, firearms, ammunition, collectible timepieces, some cash, and precious metals to an extent. I would also add the fact the US federal gov't enacted FACTA they way they did, this is a sign to me they are trying to keep the inmates from escaping the asylum (this and the "wall" who can keep people in as well as out). Truly big fish always find ways around obstacles, but it is the proles who won't be able to store their $30,000 life savings in a safer foreign bank in Asia or Switzerland. I'm not up on Canadian law but AFAIK your gov't has yet to go full Stalin on financial matters. Long term I myself may become an expat and renounce, I'm just not ready to do so just yet. I firmly believe the US will be imploded like the Soviet Union either by plan or involuntarily.

  • DweezilSFV DweezilSFV on Aug 11, 2016

    A lot of this auto loan debt is that there is a voracious demand for ABS: asset backed securities. The loans are sold to Wall Street to securitize and sell to institutional investors, pension funds, mutual funds and public retirement schemes. Just like MBS: mortgage backed securities which brought us the Great Meltdown of 2008. A lot of these loans are "generate to sell". They don't give a frig who gets a loan so long as there's money to be made in bundling them with a bunch of other loans and when they go bad someone else is holding the bag. Watch this sector. I really believe it's an indicator of trouble ahead.

  • Jeff JMII--If I did not get my Maverick my next choice was a Santa Cruz. They are different but then they are both compact pickups the only real compact pickups on the market. I am glad to hear that the Santa Cruz will have knobs and buttons on it for 2025 it would be good if they offered a hybrid as well. When I looked at both trucks it was less about brand loyalty and more about price, size, and features. I have owned 2 gm made trucks in the past and liked both but gm does not make a true compact truck and neither does Ram, Toyota, or Nissan. The Maverick was the only Ford product that I wanted. If I wanted a larger truck I would have kept either my 99 S-10 extended cab with a 2.2 I-4 5 speed or my 08 Isuzu I-370 4 x 4 with the 3.7 I-5, tow package, heated leather seats, and other niceties and it road like a luxury vehicle. I believe the demand is there for other manufacturers to make compact pickups. The proposed hybrid Toyota Stout would be a great truck. Subaru has experience making small trucks and they could make a very competitive compact truck and Subaru has a great all wheel drive system. Chevy has a great compact pickup offered in South America called the Montana which gm could be made in North America and offered in the US and Canada. Ram has a great little compact truck offered in South America as well.
  • Groza George I don’t care about GM’s anything. They have not had anything of interest or of reasonable quality in a generation and now solely stay on business to provide UAW retirement while they slowly move production to Mexico.
  • Arthur Dailey We have a lease coming due in October and no intention of buying the vehicle when the lease is up.Trying to decide on a replacement vehicle our preferences are the Maverick, Subaru Forester and Mazda CX-5 or CX-30.Unfortunately both the Maverick and Subaru are thin on the ground. Would prefer a Maverick with the hybrid, but the wife has 2 'must haves' those being heated seats and blind spot monitoring. That requires a factory order on the Maverick bringing Canadian price in the mid $40k range, and a delivery time of TBD. For the Subaru it looks like we would have to go up 2 trim levels to get those and that also puts it into the mid $40k range.Therefore are contemplating take another 2 or 3 year lease. Hoping that vehicle supply and prices stabilize and purchasing a hybrid or electric when that lease expires. By then we will both be retired, so that vehicle could be a 'forever car'. And an increased 'carbon tax' just kicked in this week in most of Canada. Prices are currently $1.72 per litre. Which according to my rough calculations is approximately $5.00 per gallon in US currency.Any recommendations would be welcomed.
  • Eric Wait! They're moving? Mexico??!!
  • GrumpyOldMan All modern road vehicles have tachometers in RPM X 1000. I've often wondered if that is a nanny-state regulation to prevent drivers from confusing it with the speedometer. If so, the Ford retro gauges would appear to be illegal.
Next