Bad News for Tesla: Another Autopilot Crash and a Missed Production Target

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

A rollover crash on the Pennsylvania Turnpike doesn’t generate many headlines, unless it’s a Tesla Model X operating in Autopilot mode.

After last week’s revelation of a fatal May crash involving Autopilot, another incident involving the semi-autonomous technology is the last thing the automaker needs, but that’s what happened on July 1, according to the Detroit Free Press.

A Model X owned by Southfield, Michigan art dealer Albert Scaglione crashed outside of Bedford, Pennsylvania, about halfway between Pittsburgh and Harrisburg. The vehicle, which the owner said was in Autopilot mode, left its lane, hit the guardrail, rebounded across both lanes and overturned after striking the concrete median.

Neither the owner or his son-in-law were seriously hurt in the crash.

While the Autopilot system in the vehicle involved in the May 7 crash in Florida failed to recognize a truck crossing the highway, there’s no evidence at this time that the Autopilot in Scaglione’s Model X contributed to the crash. Still, bad PR is bad PR, and for Tesla it comes at a very bad time.

Besides the questions raised about the safety of the Autopilot system, the automaker recently missed its second quarter vehicle delivery target of 17,000 units. Tesla delivered 14,370 vehicles in the last quarter, less than the previous quarter’s tally of 15,510 units. The company blames the shortfall on a June production ramp-up that saw many vehicles built too late to count as second-quarter deliveries.

A failure to meet targets casts doubt on any company’s abilities. Tesla claims it wants to produce between 80,000 and 90,000 vehicles this year, and have output reach 500,000 units per year in 2018. During that time — the automaker has to shoehorn the Model 3 — a high-volume, lower-cost model, into its assembly operations.

Company founder and CEO Elon Musk’s recent bid to purchase solar energy giant SolarCity at such a critical time for the automaker was criticized by shareholders. That move caused jittery investors to put downward pressure on the automaker’s stock.

[Image: Tesla Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 58 comments
  • Spartan Spartan on Jul 07, 2016

    All this negative press about Tesla makes it seem as if we want them to fail. I know the press has a job to do, but seriously, this is getting ridiculous. "Tesla curbs wheel while attempting to auto parallel park. Stock drops 50%! Company may go under tomorrow!"

  • Ronnie Schreiber Ronnie Schreiber on Jul 07, 2016

    Besides the impact, no pun intended, on Tesla, crashes suspected of Autopilot involvement could slow consumer acceptance of autonomous driving technology in general. By rolling out something in beta form, before its time, Tesla may have hurt the entire concept of self-driving cars.

  • Mike Wasnt even a 60/40 vote. Thats really i teresting.....
  • SCE to AUX "discounts don’t usually come without terms attached"[list][*]How about: "discounts usually have terms attached"?[/*][/list]"Any configurations not listed in that list are not eligible for discounts"[list][*]How about "the list contains the only eligible configurations"?[/*][/list]Interesting conquest list - smart move.
  • 1995 SC Milking this story, arent you?
  • ToolGuy "Nothing is greater than the original. Same goes for original Ford Parts. They’re the parts we built to build your Ford. Anything else is imitation."
  • Slavuta I don't know how they calc this. My newest cars are 2017 and 2019, 40 and 45K. Both needed tires at 30K+, OEM tires are now don't last too long. This is $1000 in average (may be less). Brakes DYI, filters, oil, wipers. I would say, under $1500 under 45K miles. But with the new tires that will last 60K, new brakes, this sum could be less in the next 40K miles.
Next