Electric Cars = Quiet Roadways? Not so Fast…

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Because we’ll all be travelling around in autonomous electric pods any day now, more and more people want to know whether they’ll be able to hear a pin drop on the sidewalk once those nasty internal combustion vehicles are extinct.

Well, if it’s serene, pastoral bliss you’re looking forward to, don’t expect to find it anywhere near a freeway. The folks at Clean Technica looked at the best studies available on the issue, and the results are bad news for those who think “EV” is another word for “whisper.”

No longer as rare and exciting as when the first models hit the market, electric vehicles still make up only a tiny sliver of overall market share. But the day might come when we’re all dependent on ions for propulsion, instead of evil hydrocarbons.

In order to prevent the crushing of small children and other bipedal creatures in urban environments, EVs emit a a high-pitched whine that doesn’t travel very far. They’re infinitely quieter than revving gas engines, booming diesels and the symphony of stressed exhaust systems.

So, yes — at low speeds, EVs are quiet as hell. But there’s so much else to the picture.

First, think of what you hear right now. Traffic has always been this noisy, right? Wrong. Advancements in engine and tire technology means today’s vehicles are far quieter than those produced even a few decades ago. You’re already hearing less noise than you used to.

But back to EVs. While EVs emit next to no engine noise, that’s their only saving grace. As speeds rise, a gas-powered vehicle’s engine noise falls as a percentage of overall noise, and tire noise picks up. Two highway traffic noise studies published by researchers in the U.S. and Netherlands show an insignificant gap between tire noise and overall noise at highway speeds.

EV tires aren’t magical — they’re made of the same stuff as every other tire. And that abrasive rubber is rolling along an imperfect surface made of asphalt.

The U.S. study found that aerodynamic noise — the sound made by a vehicle pushing air out of its way — outweighs engine noise in internal combustion vehicles at speeds above 110 kilometers per hour (68 mph). Even at low speeds, tire noise outweighs engine noise by a factor of 2:1.

In fact, tire noise and overall noise were so closely tied, the difference between the two wouldn’t be noticeable to the human ear (less than three decibels).

The Dutch study, which used different methodologies, backs up most of the U.S. findings. At 25 miles per hour, engine noise is slightly higher than tire noise, but both are outweighed by overall “road noise.” Once speeds hit 43 mph (70 km/h) engine noise was nearly half of the noise emitted by tires. At 60 mph, engine noise has little significance.

So, while there’ll be less “sharp” sounds in our electric future — tire chirping, revving, and obnoxious mufflers — overall highway noise will continue with little change. Your emissions-free Tesla, Bolt, Leaf or whatever comes next will keep oil in the ground, but it won’t stop noise pollution.

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 58 comments
  • Raph Raph on Jun 07, 2016

    I figured it would be tire noise. That's what I mostly hear from the majority of vehicles on the road. Especially people who neglect to rotate their tires or do not rotate them correctly (looking at the buffoons that rotate only front to back and the tires end up cupping as a result - because you know like changing out that winter and summer air you should never cross-rotate radial tires!)

  • Sector 5 Sector 5 on Jun 07, 2016

    Sirens - when we do go fully self driving let's convert them back to bells.. Well done Japan keeping your fire truck bells for gentler occasions.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh *Why would anyone buy this* when the 2025 RamCharger is right around the corner, *faster* with vastly *better mpg* and stupid amounts of torque using a proven engine layout and motivation drive in use since 1920.
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I hate this soooooooo much. but the 2025 RAMCHARGER is the CORRECT bridge for people to go electric. I hate dodge (thanks for making me buy 2 replacement 46RH's) .. but the ramcharger's electric drive layout is *vastly* superior to a full electric car in dense populous areas where charging is difficult and where moron luddite science hating trumpers sabotage charges or block them.If Toyota had a tundra in the same config i'd plop 75k cash down today and burn my pos chevy in the dealer parking lot
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I own my house 100% paid for at age 52. the answer is still NO.-28k (realistically) would take 8 years to offset my gas truck even with its constant repair bills (thanks chevy)-Still takes too long to charge UNTIL solidsate batteries are a thing and 80% in 15 minutes becomes a reality (for ME anyways, i get others are willing to wait)For the rest of the market, especially people in dense cityscape, apartments dens rentals it just isnt feasible yet IMO.
  • ToolGuy I do like the fuel economy of a 6-cylinder engine. 😉
  • Carson D I'd go with the RAV4. It will last forever, and someone will pay you for it if you ever lose your survival instincts.
Next