Does Tesla's Autopilot Hate Humans, or Just This Guy?

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

There’s no shortage of safety-minded autonomous technology on Tesla vehicles, but a video suggests some features could say “forget it” when asked to work.

YouTube user Kman recently posted a video showing real-world testing of the collision avoidance abilities of the Autopilot feature in a Tesla Model S 90D — tests that nearly got his friend splattered across the pavement.

In the video, first discovered by the EV website Electrek, the two friends test the vehicle’s low-speed Summon mode, as well as its Traffic Aware Cruise Control and Automatic Emergency Braking systems.

The Summon test shows the Model S’s sensors detecting a collision when a friend stands in front of the vehicle, and when he walks into its path. A frontal collision warning signal lights up in the vehicle’s gauge cluster and the Model S stops in time to prevent tears (and lawsuits).

Things get much hairier when the Model S has to avoid the same human while driving at the lowest possible speed for the Autopilot feature to work — 18 miles per hour. In these two tests, where the trusting friend jumps in front of the moving vehicle, the Tesla recognizes the roadway object but doesn’t do anything to avoid the collision.

In the first test, performed on a residential street, the system “failed to do anything but warn me, the driver, both audible and visually that I was going to collide with a (sic) object,” stated Kman. “The Collision avoidance system failed to stop the Tesla.”

The second test, on a more sparsely populated road, was worse:

The Collision Avoidance system while under autopilot waited even LONGER to alert me of a potential collision. I did have the distance setting at it’s (sic) maximum of 7, and gave the collision avoidance system as much opportunity to attempt to slow or stop the car yet again, yet again, the collision avoidance system came up shore (sic) on the Tesla S and only gave a (sic) Audible and Visual warning.

The video’s creator said he’s seen that particular vehicle’s system prevent collisions with other vehicles in the past, so he knows the feature works. Automatic emergency braking was added to Tesla vehicles last year.

There’s no shortage of media reports of Tesla vehicles avoiding accidents thanks to its collision avoidance features, just as there’s many unsubstantiated claims that a driver’s accident was the result of the system not working. It’s impossible to say why the vehicle in the video didn’t brake during the last two tests, even after detecting the impending collision, but it’s a good reminder not to leave all the big decisions to your car’s electronics.

Eyes on the road and hands on the wheel.

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 41 comments
  • Old Man Pants Old Man Pants on Jun 27, 2016

    I'm waiting for the first .460 Weatherby versus rogue Tesla videos.

    • See 2 previous
    • 28-Cars-Later 28-Cars-Later on Jun 27, 2016

      @Old Man Pants Without a grille, the Tesla loses it menace. Did someone write it a script for Abilify?

  • Runs_on_h8raide Runs_on_h8raide on Jun 27, 2016

    I also foresee a new movie for the Star Trek series. It's called "The Wrath of Elon" The year is 2035...Tesla autos has become the defacto automobile and mode of transportation for all plebeians on a planet called Euphemism. After successful progress of SpaceX, Elon Musk conquered his first planet and is in sole control of planet Euphemism. All criticism of his automobiles are met with swift death, whereby the owner is run over, trapped in their car and driven off cliffs or crashed into trees. It is up to the crew of Star Trek to return order to planet Euphism and stop the evil Elon from the genocide that is being wrought on planet Euphemism.

  • Buickman I like it!
  • JMII Hyundai Santa Cruz, which doesn't do "truck" things as well as the Maverick does.How so? I see this repeated often with no reference to exactly what it does better.As a Santa Cruz owner the only things the Mav does better is price on lower trims and fuel economy with the hybrid. The Mav's bed is a bit bigger but only when the SC has the roll-top bed cover, without this they are the same size. The Mav has an off road package and a towing package the SC lacks but these are just some parts differences. And even with the tow package the Hyundai is rated to tow 1,000lbs more then the Ford. The SC now has XRT trim that beefs up the looks if your into the off-roader vibe. As both vehicles are soft-roaders neither are rock crawling just because of some extra bits Ford tacked on.I'm still loving my SC (at 9k in mileage). I don't see any advantages to the Ford when you are looking at the medium to top end trims of both vehicles. If you want to save money and gas then the Ford becomes the right choice. You will get a cheaper interior but many are fine with this, especially if don't like the all touch controls on the SC. However this has been changed in the '25 models in which buttons and knobs have returned.
  • Analoggrotto I'd feel proper silly staring at an LCD pretending to be real gauges.
  • Gray gm should hang their wimpy logo on a strip mall next to Saul Goodman's office.
  • 1995 SC No
Next