There's an Affordable International Engine of the Year Winner, If You Can Find It

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

If you want to own one of the world’s best engines (as ranked by a panel of multi-national auto journos), you don’t necessarily have to find a higher paying job or buy a plane ticket to Europe.

Most categories at the recently announced 2016 International Engine of the Year Awards were won by high-end powerplants and European mills you won’t find in North America — except for one entry dominated by Ford.

Winning the sub 1-liter class for the fifth year in a row was Ford’s 1.0-liter EcoBoost three-cylinder, an engine available in the Fiesta and Focus, but rarely talked about on these shores. (Unless you’re TTAC’s managing editor).

That tiny mill was lauded for its technology and power-to-displacement ratio. The automaker uses the 1.0-liter EcoBoost in a slew of European models, with one in five new Ford vehicles featuring the engine last year, according to the company.

The North American take up rate? Ever so drastically less.

In a wildly unshocking move, Tesla Motors won the “green engine” category for the lineup of drivetrains offered in the Model S and X.

Other winners available to drivers on this side of the Atlantic were BMW’s 1.5-liter three-cylinder hybrid powerplant, which powers the pricey i8 sportscar, and the turbocharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder in the Mercedes-AMG CLA45 and GLA45.

Going up the displacement scale, Audi’s turbocharged 2.5-liter five-cylinder (bound for the U.S. in the 2017 RS3) grabbed a top prize, as did Porsche’s turbocharged 3.0-liter flat six.

Winner of four categories, including the top “engine of the year” spot, “performance engine” and “new engine,” was Ferrari’s 3.9-liter biturbo V8, offered in the 488 GTB. After going gaga over small-displacement motors for the past several years, the panel went with a block that has more than four holes in it.

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 50 comments
  • 05lgt 05lgt on Jun 02, 2016

    What's with the displacement obsession? Power to mass, power to required underhood volume, power per fuel; these are what matters. 1.5l + 200lbs of plumbing and 3ft3 of extra space is worse than 2.5l NA. I'm sure they design to what matters, why must media and therefore marketers obsess on displacement?

  • Maserchist Maserchist on Jun 08, 2016

    Great juxtaposition of the Pratt & Whitney engine advertisement at the very end of the comments section FWIW...

  • Lorenzo Yes, they can recover from the Ghosn-led corporate types who cheapened vehicles in the worst ways, including quality control. In the early to mid-1990s Nissan had efficient engines, and reliable drivetrains in well-assembled, fairly durable vehicles. They can do it again, but the Japanese government will have to help Nissan extricate itself from the "Alliance". It's too bad Japan didn't have a George Washington to warn about entangling alliances!
  • Slavuta Nissan + profitability = cheap crap
  • ToolGuy Why would they change the grille?
  • Oberkanone Nissan proved it can skillfully put new frosting on an old cake with Frontier and Z. Yet, Nissan dealers are so broken they are not good at selling the Frontier. Z production is so minimal I've yet to see one. Could Nissan boost sales? Sure. I've heard Nissan plans to regain share at the low end of the market. Kicks, Versa and lower priced trims of their mainstream SUV's. I just don't see dealerships being motivated to support this effort. Nissan is just about as exciting and compelling as a CVT.
  • ToolGuy Anyone who knows, is this the (preliminary) work of the Ford Skunk Works?
Next