General Motors Sued Over Previous-Generation Cruze Diesels

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

A Seattle law firm famous for going after automakers (and lately, diesel-producing automakers) has another target in its sights: General Motors.

According to The Detroit News, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro filed a class-action lawsuit in California yesterday, accusing GM and Chevrolet of misleading buyers of Chevy Cruze models equipped with the 2.0-liter diesel engine.

Much like in its two suits against Daimler, parent company of Mercedes-Benz, the firm accuses GM of using software to cheat on emissions tests, citing high emissions recorded during real-world testing. The six plaintiffs behind the suit want a vehicle buyback, reimbursement for the premium they paid over a regular Cruze, and punitive damages.

Chevrolet briefly offered a diesel version of the 2014 and 2015 model year Cruze, but uptake wasn’t high. The automaker pulled the plug as the second-generation Cruze loomed, and a spokesperson said they hadn’t sold one since May 2015.

The evidence behind the suit, at first glance, seems questionable. The law firm says its clients measured their own tailpipe emissions using portable equipment, which showed the Cruze diesel exceeded acceptable emissions levels at certain times.

In response to the firm’s earlier lawsuits, Mercedes-Benz said the effectiveness of its AdBlue urea-injection systems diminishes in cold weather to prevent condensation in the exhaust system. Since the Volkswagen diesel emissions scandal, other automakers accused of polluting have pointed to the challenge of keeping a diesel engine running clean under all conditions. TTAC once took a close look at how the technology on the Cruze diesel stacks up against a recalled Volkswagen TDI.

Responding to the lawsuit, GM stated, “These claims are baseless and we will vigorously defend ourselves. GM believes the Chevrolet Cruze turbo diesel complies with all U.S. EPA and CARB emissions regulations.”

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 26 comments
  • CincyDavid CincyDavid on Jun 23, 2016

    I have seen a grand total one ONE Cruze diesel in the wild. As much as GM frustrates me, I absolutely detest these money-grubbing bottom feeder shysters extorting money with nuisance suits. Attorneys are slimy enough, these guys are right up there with the personal injury guys who advertise on billboards.

    • See 1 previous
    • PrincipalDan PrincipalDan on Jun 24, 2016

      @redapple Every time TORT reform has come up it gets killed very quickly in congress. But then again we do keep electing lawyers to political office, so what do you expect?

  • Jdowmiller Jdowmiller on Jun 24, 2016

    Photographed on the Korean Veterans Blvd bridge downtown Nashville. Was this car made at the GM plant in Spring Hill? I've never seen one of these in the wild.

  • Marcr My wife and I mostly work from home (or use public transit), the kid is grown, and we no longer do road trips of more than 150 miles or so. Our one car mostly gets used for local errands and the occasional airport pickup. The first non-Tesla, non-Mini, non-Fiat, non-Kia/Hyundai, non-GM (I do have my biases) small fun-to-drive hatchback EV with 200+ mile range, instrument display behind the wheel where it belongs and actual knobs for oft-used functions for under $35K will get our money. What we really want is a proper 21st century equivalent of the original Honda Civic. The Volvo EX30 is close and may end up being the compromise choice.
  • Mebgardner I test drove a 2023 2.5 Rav4 last year. I passed on it because it was a very noisy interior, and handled poorly on uneven pavement (filled potholes), which Tucson has many. Very little acoustic padding mean you talk loudly above 55 mph. The forums were also talking about how the roof leaks from not properly sealed roof rack holes, and door windows leaking into the lower door interior. I did not stick around to find out if all that was true. No talk about engine troubles though, this is new info to me.
  • Dave Holzman '08 Civic (stick) that I bought used 1/31/12 with 35k on the clock. Now at 159k.It runs as nicely as it did when I bought it. I love the feel of the car. The most expensive replacement was the AC compressor, I think, but something to do with the AC that went at 80k and cost $1300 to replace. It's had more stuff replaced than I expected, but not enough to make me want to ditch a car that I truly enjoy driving.
  • ToolGuy Let's review: I am a poor unsuccessful loser. Any car company which introduced an EV which I could afford would earn my contempt. Of course I would buy it, but I wouldn't respect them. 😉
  • ToolGuy Correct answer is the one that isn't a Honda.
Next