Hyperloop Makes Successful Open-Air Test, Breaks the Speed of Yawn

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

No one wants their most exciting moment to last two seconds, so let’s hope the folks at Hyperloop One have bigger things coming down the, erm, pipe.

Yesterday, amid great fanfare and hype, the recently renamed Hyperloop One (formerly Hyperloop Technologies) performed the first open-air test of the electromagnetic propulsion system at the heart of the futuristic transportation concept.

As a bandstand of employees and media watched beneath the hot Nevada sun, a test vehicle rocketed along a track for two seconds, hitting Camry-on-a-joyride speeds — officially, 116 miles per hour — before plowing into a sand trap. The future doesn’t have brakes yet, just sand.

Underwhelmed by the spectacle? Hyperloop One would probably counter that by saying you aren’t using your imagination.

The Guardian newspaper was being imaginative when it described the test as reaching “the technological heights of a 1996-era rollercoaster.”

Company co-founder and chief technology officer Brogan BamBrogan, whose name and moustache are anything but boring, called the test one of Hyperloop’s “bigger, more tangible” milestones.

In Hyperloop land, the test was a major step towards missile-shaped pods filled with people rushing on a cushion of air through low-pressure tubes at the speed of sound. The concept, conceived in the madcap brain of Tesla and SpaceX founder Elon Musk, was gifted to the world by the man in the sleeping bag.

Musk delivered kudos over Twitter following the demonstration, which could have upped the “wow” factor by having the test vehicle disappear without a trace at the end of the track.

Two teams are seriously pursuing the wheelless future of land transport — Hyperloop One and Hyperloop Transportation Technologies, both headquartered in the southwestern United States. Musk isn’t working with either team, but follows the work on his concept closely.

BamBrogan showed up in Detroit last month with the intent of drawing engineers away from the auto industry. There’s a hiring binge underway at Hyperloop One, and BamBrogan wants the best and brightest on board his tube to the future.

Yesterday’s test might have thrilled engineers and employees of his company, but BamBrogan’s only hope of quelling the snark and cynicism surrounding Hyperloop is to perform longer, faster and more complete tests, find more financial backers (they already have several), and prove the technical and financial feasibility of the technology to the naysaying public.

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 44 comments
  • 70Cougar 70Cougar on May 13, 2016

    I can't believe people waste time trying to invent things. What will they try next, a computer that fits in your pocket and connects to a global information network?

    • 05lgt 05lgt on May 13, 2016

      Nope, that's the old new. The new new is a vest that monitors twitter feeds and communicates to the candidate via patterned vibrations so he truly tell the people what they want to hear. Sadly, it ends up working a lot like the Microsoft twitter AI...

  • Maseraudi Maseraudi on May 13, 2016

    I kinda of thought the whole hyperyloop hype was a new money sucking scheme but then I read that the french railway system was investing in it. Now I am sure it is...

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh haaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahaha
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh *Why would anyone buy this* when the 2025 RamCharger is right around the corner, *faster* with vastly *better mpg* and stupid amounts of torque using a proven engine layout and motivation drive in use since 1920.
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I hate this soooooooo much. but the 2025 RAMCHARGER is the CORRECT bridge for people to go electric. I hate dodge (thanks for making me buy 2 replacement 46RH's) .. but the ramcharger's electric drive layout is *vastly* superior to a full electric car in dense populous areas where charging is difficult and where moron luddite science hating trumpers sabotage charges or block them.If Toyota had a tundra in the same config i'd plop 75k cash down today and burn my pos chevy in the dealer parking lot
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I own my house 100% paid for at age 52. the answer is still NO.-28k (realistically) would take 8 years to offset my gas truck even with its constant repair bills (thanks chevy)-Still takes too long to charge UNTIL solidsate batteries are a thing and 80% in 15 minutes becomes a reality (for ME anyways, i get others are willing to wait)For the rest of the market, especially people in dense cityscape, apartments dens rentals it just isnt feasible yet IMO.
  • ToolGuy I do like the fuel economy of a 6-cylinder engine. 😉
Next