Another Lawsuit Launched at Mercedes-Benz in Diesel Litigation Barrage

by Steph Willems

Published: April 8th, 2016

another lawsuit launched at mercedes benz in diesel litigation barrage

Mercedes-Benz’s parent company, Daimler, has been hit with a second lawsuit from a U.S. law firm that represents owners of diesel vehicles, despite recent evidence that could render the suit invalid.

The suit from now-familiar firm Hagens Berman accuses the German automaker of employing an emissions “defeat device,” a la Volkswagen, in its diesel vehicles, according to Reuters (via Automotive News).

The suit alleges the device must be the cause of laboratory emissions test results that show higher nitrogen oxide emissions than during real-world tests.

Hagens Berman sued Daimler in February after Mercedes-Benz revealed that the effectiveness of the AdBlue urea-injection system in its Bluetec line of vehicles was reduced in cold temperatures to prevent condensation in the exhaust system.

Daimler has refuted the defeat device accusation, calling the class-action lawsuit “unfounded.”

“A component that inadmissibly reduces emissions is not used in Mercedes-Benz vehicles,” said Daimler in a statement.

Yesterday, Reuters reported that the German Federal Motor Transport Authority had completed tests on European diesel models, and found that only Volkswagen employed an emissions-cheating defeat device.

Other models showed irregularities during real-world testing, but they were within legal limits, the report said.

The Environmental Protection Agency requested information from Daimler following the first lawsuit, but no investigation into the automaker was opened. The regulator blew the lid off the Volkswagen diesel emissions scandal by issuing a notice of violation of the Clean Air Act last September.

The exceptionally busy Hagens Berman is also behind a lawsuit filed this week on behalf of an Illinois Volkswagen dealer group, which targets the automaker for diesel-related financial losses.

#ClassAction #Daimler #Diesel #Emissions #Environment #EPA #Green #Lawsuit #Legal #Mercedes-Benz #VW #Volkswagen

Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments

Join the conversation

4 of 17 comments

Sector 5 on Apr 08, 2016

I'm no emissions engineer but I operate around a fleet of Blutec Sprinters in the snowbelt. You just never smell diesel fumes around these van indoors or outdoors, hot or cold. I can't speak for any particulates but MB's done an awesome job compared to other diesels I've endured 30 years. Note: I'm going on about the newer Blutec with DEF not the older smokies.

Like Reply
- See 1 previous
- Rudolph on Apr 08, 2016
  
  →Joss re older smokies I can still recall being immediately behind Greyhound buses in the 1950s with their 2-cycle 6-71 engines (what a “high”) ‼
  
  Like
- Derekson on Apr 08, 2016
  
  NOx is not diesel smelling exhaust pollution. NOx emissions are also not "rolling coal" black exhaust. NOx emissions are colorless and mostly odorless.
  
  Like
SunnyvaleCA on Apr 11, 2016

Is the this a misprint? "laboratory emissions test results that show higher nitrogen oxide emissions than during real-world tests" Seems like the claim is that Mercedes pollutes LESS in the real world than what laboratory tests imply.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Jeff Self driving cars are not ready for prime time.
Lichtronamo Watch as the non-us based automakers shift more production to Mexico in the future.
28-Cars-Later " Electrek recently dug around in Tesla’s online parts catalog and found that the windshield costs a whopping $1,900 to replace.To be fair, that’s around what a Mercedes S-Class or Rivian windshield costs, but the Tesla’s glass is unique because of its shape. It’s also worth noting that most insurance plans have glass replacement options that can make the repair a low- or zero-cost issue. "Now I understand why my insurance is so high despite no claims for years and about 7,500 annual miles between three cars.
AMcA My theory is that that when the Big 3 gave away the store to the UAW in the last contract, there was a side deal in which the UAW promised to go after the non-organized transplant plants. Even the UAW understands that if the wage differential gets too high it's gonna kill the golden goose.
MKizzy Why else does range matter? Because in the EV advocate's dream scenario of a post-ICE future, the average multi-car household will find itself with more EVs in their garages and driveways than places to plug them in or the capacity to charge then all at once without significant electrical upgrades. Unless each vehicle has enough range to allow for multiple days without plugging in, fighting over charging access in multi-EV households will be right up there with finances for causes of domestic strife.