Guess Whose YouTube Channel Works Again?

Mark Stevenson
by Mark Stevenson

YouTube has finally processed our counterclaim to Volkswagen’s claim of copyright infringement. And guess what? YouTube’s copyright bots decided in our favor! I’m right chuffed about it.

What does that mean? Well, not so much for you, but it means we can do our jobs a bit more effectively. Also, it means David can still take on Goliath — and win.

It’s been over a month since we made our counterclaim against Volkswagen’s copyright infringement claim. Google’s Search servers might be lightning fast, but its process for sorting out a copyright claim for YouTube is arduously slow.

To celebrate our win, enjoy this soothing, Volkswagen infotainment B-roll. Ohhhh yeah.

Mark Stevenson
Mark Stevenson

More by Mark Stevenson

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 27 comments
  • Xeranar Xeranar on Mar 06, 2016

    This is increasingly becoming an issue as YT has to deal with more and more videos uploaded every minute. So for a short briefing: Youtube implemented this system in response to taking away their responsibility for the DMCA (a Republican favorite for you right-wingers out there). It isn't that the law is awful, it is to some extent, but rather that Google's solution is really awful. Basically they automated the system to bring down the copyright infringers faster and they do bring down SCORES OF THEM. The constant barrage of illegal posting is an issue but in the same breath sites like TTAC can be trolled by corporations for violations. It doesn't mean that TTAC can't or doesn't violate the rules at times but there needs to be a clear and separate path for 'official' channels that are accepted as monetized entities and present themselves as upright actors. This is happening to scores of internet reviewers, video game lets players, and the like that use established media to create new and interesting works. Until Youtube fixes this new trolls are going to spring up to steal revenue (since they allow all monetization to go to them until it gets reversed instead of escrow) and corporations are going to aggressively abuse it to the point where they'll continue to silence views they dislike.

    • See 1 previous
    • Xeranar Xeranar on Mar 06, 2016

      @VCplayer The core of DMCA is wholly in the neocon corporatist architecture. Democrats passed it in the era of Third-way approach so if that bill came back up it would likely suffer major changes or complete blockage. As it stands, it's really outmoded. It was a stop-gap measure when the internet was new and unfolding. It's going to need to change and Google's YT needs to shift how they make their complaint system work but that may end up costing some access to YT as other 3rd party video sites get more and more bandwidth access. Frankly, the system is wholly convoluted....

  • Ktm Ktm on Mar 06, 2016

    To add to Xeranar's post, there is (are) companies that do exactly this as a form of business - the file a copyright infringement claim against a channel and have it taken down while they then profit from the monetization of the same video. It takes Youtube MONTHS to resolve the claim, resulting in loss of revenue for the original channel and a boon for the trolling company. Said company does this against a multitude of channels, even if the content is purely original.

  • SCE to AUX "discounts don’t usually come without terms attached"[list][*]How about: "discounts usually have terms attached"?[/*][/list]"Any configurations not listed in that list are not eligible for discounts"[list][*]How about "the list contains the only eligible configurations"?[/*][/list]Interesting conquest list - smart move.
  • 1995 SC Milking this story, arent you?
  • ToolGuy "Nothing is greater than the original. Same goes for original Ford Parts. They’re the parts we built to build your Ford. Anything else is imitation."
  • Slavuta I don't know how they calc this. My newest cars are 2017 and 2019, 40 and 45K. Both needed tires at 30K+, OEM tires are now don't last too long. This is $1000 in average (may be less). Brakes DYI, filters, oil, wipers. I would say, under $1500 under 45K miles. But with the new tires that will last 60K, new brakes, this sum could be less in the next 40K miles.
  • BeauCharles I had a 2010 Sportback GTS for 10 years. Most reliable car I ever own. Never once needed to use that super long warranty - nothing ever went wrong. Regular maintenance and tires was all I did. It's styling was great too. Even after all those years it looked better than many current models. Biggest gripe I had was the interior. Cheap (but durable) materials and no sound insulation to speak of. If Mitsubishi had addressed those items I'm sure it would have sold better.
Next