Donald Trump Still Doesn't Understand How NAFTA Works

Mark Stevenson
by Mark Stevenson

Donald Trump, while on the campaign trail in Michigan, is still promising to apply a 35-percent import tariff on vehicles built by Ford if it continues with plans to expand operations in Mexico, even though Trump wouldn’t have the authority to implement a tariff as president, reports The Detroit Free Press.

“We are going to do something that is going to (be) great (and) a very big beneficiary is going to be Michigan,” Trump said while speaking to supporters at Macomb Community College on Friday. “The car business is being abused more than most other businesses. … Mexico is becoming the new China.”

And we all know how much Trump looooooooves China.

From The Detroit Free Press:

In a speech full of references to Michigan’s dominant auto industry and the threats posed by foreign competition and outsourcing, Trump whipped up the crowd at the college Sports and Expo Center in Warren, saying he was “100% sure” a Trump presidency would keep Ford Motor Co. from opening any future plant in Mexico. And he suggested that was just the start for his negotiating better business deals in the U.S. and around the globe to create and save jobs.

(Emphasis mine.)

“Within 24 to 48 hours I will get a call from the head of Ford and he will say, ‘Mr. President, we have decided we’re going to build our new plant in the United States.’ … That’s 100% sure. … They’re going to say, ‘We’re moving back. You want us to move to Michigan?’ And I’ll say, ‘Yeah.'”

However, even as commander in chief, Trump wouldn’t have the legal authority to apply tariffs to Mexican imports protected under the North American Free Trade Agreement. All tariffs, which includes those applied against automotive products defined in the agreement, were lifted by January 1, 2008 or earlier.

Following the speech, Ford reconfirmed its plan to invest $9 billion in U.S. facilities in the next four years.

The latest volley aimed at Ford is a continuation of threat made in June 2015, when the Republican presidential candidate hopeful said, “Let me give you the bad news: every car, every truck and every part manufactured in this plant that comes across the border, we’re going to charge you a 35 percent tax — OK? — and that tax is going to be paid simultaneously with the transaction. They are going to take away thousands of jobs.”

During the same speech on Friday, Trump condemned Japanese imports, even though a number of Japanese manufacturers have set up assembly facilities within the United States.

“I want those cars made in Michigan. The Japanese can do them, but let them make them here,” he said.

This comes after another false claim made by Trump in June 2015, where he stated you can’t find a Chevrolet in Japan.

[Image: Gage Skidmore/Flickr ( CC BY-SA 2.0)]

Mark Stevenson
Mark Stevenson

More by Mark Stevenson

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 287 comments
  • Chocolatedeath Chocolatedeath on Mar 07, 2016

    SO..we is the article about cars anyway..lol.. I am Neoconservative and all of the candidates scare the hell out of me.

  • HotPotato HotPotato on Mar 08, 2016

    There was a good radio piece on the Marketplace radio show today about how Mexican manufacturing wages are now effectively something like 40% lower than Chinese wages. They interviewed a lady who made high-tech fiber-optic parts in a maquiladora (Mexican factory) for a US company. To stay warm in winter, her family had to burn wood in a barrel in the house. And even that bundle of wood cost literally half a day's wages. She and other workers tried forming a union to ask management for better pay. They were all fired. Totally illegal, but the government is weak and consequently so is the rule of law in Mexico, so "chanza gorda" for justice. The wealthy elite and the drug cartels--but I repeat myself!--rule the place. It's not just manufacturing. Indian programmers work cheaper than you do. Chinese engineers work cheaper than you do. Software can do what entry-level lawyers used to do. And the Internet has made it possible to eliminate middlemen such as franchised car dealerships--whew, at least there's one upside!

    • See 1 previous
    • Highdesertcat Highdesertcat on Mar 13, 2016

      @DeadWeight Trump definitely has tapped into the discontent of America's workers all across the political spectrum and created a movement. But the GOP is in total disarray and looking for any means to deny Trump the nomination. Trump personifies the end of the historical GOP, and the GOP knows it. I think Hillary will be the next POTUS because every woman eligible to vote in America will want to see that first woman POTUS.

  • 1995 SC If the necessary number of employees vote to unionize then yes, they should be unionized. That's how it works.
  • Sobhuza Trooper That Dave Thomas fella sounds like the kind of twit who is oh-so-quick to tell us how easy and fun the bus is for any and all of your personal transportation needs. The time to get to and from the bus stop is never a concern. The time waiting for the bus is never a concern. The time waiting for a connection (if there is one) is never a concern. The weather is never a concern. Whatever you might be carrying or intend to purchase is never a concern. Nope, Boo Cars! Yeah Buses! Buses rule!Needless to say, these twits don't actual take the damn bus.
  • MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
  • MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh [h3]Wake me up when it is a 1989 635Csi with a M88/3[/h3]
Next