2017 Volkswagen Golf Alltrack: Hit the (Minor) Trails and Bring the Family

by Steph Willems

Published: March 21st, 2016

2017 volkswagen golf alltrack hit the minor trails and bring the family

Volkswagen has revealed the production version of its 2017 Golf Alltrack, a wagon for people who worry they won’t be able to clear that shallow ditch in a regular Golf.

Based on the Golf Sportwagen, the Alltrack pairs that body and drivetrain with 4Motion all-wheel drive, lower body cladding, and close to an inch of extra ground clearance.

The Alltrack gets a more aggressive facial treatment than its vanilla brethren, with honeycomb mesh filling the grille and lower fascia, plus standard foglights.

The all-wheel drive system in the Alltrack uses a Haldex-5 coupling that sends 50 percent of the engine’s torque rearward if the vehicle detects front wheel slippage. Electronic differential locks send power to the opposite end of the axle for individual wheel slippage.

Very adventurous owners will inevitably test the Alltrack’s hill descent control mode, which we assume should only be attempted on slanted meadows, or in, say, San Francisco.

Powering the Alltrack is Volkswagen’s well-regarded 1.8-liter turbocharged four-cylinder, making 170 horsepower and an increased 199 pounds-feet of torque. Offered initially with a six-speed dual-clutch automatic transmission when it goes on sale this fall, a six-speed manual will be offered later.

The usual safety features come along for the ride, but high-end items like automatic emergency braking and adaptive cruise control are listed as optional equipment.

Volkswagen hasn’t released fuel economy figures for the Alltrack, but the two-wheel drive SportWagen is rated at 35 miles per gallon on the highway for the automatic transmission model and 36 mpg highway for the manual.

[Images: Volkswagen of America]

#4motion #AllWheelDrive #Alltrack #Sportwagen #Volkswagen #VolkswagenAlltrack #VW #Wagons

Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments

Join the conversation

4 of 102 comments

Anonymous on Mar 22, 2016

Looks like a more fuel efficient alternative to the Tiguan.

Like Reply
Tedward on Mar 22, 2016

This is interesting for a number of reasons. I saw this car last year and they were showing a German model with a torque converter 6 Speed, basically a base wagon with auto. Switching to dsg and a 6 manual means vw is mixing r drivetrain bits with the 1.8, something only audi has done so far with the a3. Until I read this I was only interested in the eventual normal ride height version expecting the manual there. It might be my next family wagon. The euro car also had the fold away tow hitch. Regardless of vw's ratings I see jsw's and gsw's all the time with installed hitches. Also 35/36 mpg is epa rating on the fwd car with the 1.8, we'll see if that is the case with more tire exposed, awd, and the shorter ratio 6 Speed transmission. I'm skeptical. Why the comment hate on this vs the outback? It's smaller, but it will have a much nicer interior, a way better engine, better gearbox by far, and easily outhandle the outback. Demuro rightly called out the outback as worse to drive than most cuv's despite its wagon shape.

Like Reply
- See 1 previous
- Kyree on Mar 22, 2016
  
  "Switching to dsg and a 6 manual means vw is mixing r drivetrain bits with the 1.8" Excellent commentary as always. The Haldex AWD is--beside this new Golf Alltrack--unique to the R within the Golf range, but the 6-speed manual and the optional DSG are not. Those are also the two transmission options for the TDI versions of the Golf and Golf SportWagen. My own Golf SportWagen TDI has the DSG. Then again, seeing as how they're not making any TDIs right now, technically it *is* just the Golf R that's using those bits. I do think it's silly that the standard 1.8T Golf and Golf SportWagen have a 5-speed manual instead of a 6-speed, and you can only get it in the base S trim...because the 1.8T is a *very* good engine. On the---now non-existent---TDI, you can get a 6-speed all the way up to the fully-loaded SEL trim with Driver Assist and Lighting Package (good luck finding one spec'd that way, though).
  
  Like
- Tedward on Mar 22, 2016
  
  Kyree Yeah I was considering the transmission plus haldex as one unit. At least for homologation purposes. This bodes really well for future awd vw's. It might even mean they are shedding the 5, although I doubt that. I had an opportunity to ask someone who would know once and they claimed the difference between the two transmissions was several mpg (in the 5's favor), but this was at the beginning of the mkvi generation. I believe the 6 has longer ratios now. The golf twin channel turbos have a wider powerband than the old borg Warners did, so that might be a factor in the switch. Also vw has shed the 2.5 and 2.0 so I bet fleet mileage isn't really a concern if it ever was. VW should make a gti wagon variant or offer the 1.8 6 Speed at se trim. Tdi's available or otherwise. It almost smacks of protecting the tdi by keeping the 1.8 down the way they do it now.
  
  Like

Recent Comments

ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.