Volkswagen AG Broke Our YouTube

Mark Stevenson
by Mark Stevenson

The Verge has an article today about the arduous process of hoops YouTube makes publishers jump through if a copyright infringement claim is made against a video. It’s an interesting look behind the scenes of video publishing and the tools YouTube makes available to copyright holders wanting to protect intellectual property. It also highlights the lack of human-based recourse publishers have when it comes to hollow copyright claims.

“Fair use” allows limited use of copyrighted material. This is how parodies and satires get around certain legal restraints. Fair use is also why we can use snippets of articles from other outlets, so long as we don’t use those articles in their entirety.

Even further, automakers make materials available for editorial use on their own press portals. This material is offered free of charge by automakers so we can pimp their products. But sometimes they make a mistake and post the wrong thing.

Volkswagen posted the wrong thing. And now our YouTube channel is crippled.

On December 2015, we posted “ LEAKED: Volkswagen Might Show This Full TFT Display, Infotainment System at CES (Video)” with a video showcasing Volkswagen’s then-yet-to-be-shown e-Golf Touch infotainment system that the automaker was planning to show at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas.

At the time, we said this:

“For instance, Volkswagen will give quite a clear glimpse of the latest developments in in-car infotainment that are on the verge of being launched onto the market. This will see innovations such as the Golf R Touch concept car finding their way into Volkswagen’s broad product portfolio,” the automaker said in a statement.

That’s probably possibly what we’re looking at here in a B-roll video made by the automaker obtained by TTAC through less-than-official channels.

However, we actually obtained the video through the most official channel you can get in this business: the automaker’s own website. Volkswagen made an oops and we caught them — just like we caught Volvo’s mistake when they accidentally posted shots of the new S90 too early.

In the case of Volkswagen’s video, the automaker had tools available to them to retaliate. And retaliate they did. We’ve been in YouTube Hell ever since.

Thankfully, we haven’t been as restricted as many of those mentioned in The Verge article, but it’s still now more difficult for us to conduct business. We aren’t a large team. We don’t do many videos. But now the ones we post on YouTube come with extra work because of this mess. We’ve made a counterclaim based on the fact the video was downloaded from Volkswagen’s own media site. Fingers crossed we will get our YouTube channel back in good standing.

Until then, thank you, Volkswagen. Thank you ever so much.

Mark Stevenson
Mark Stevenson

More by Mark Stevenson

Comments
Join the conversation
7 of 46 comments
  • Robert.Walter Robert.Walter on Feb 02, 2016

    So TTAC misrepresented the source of the video to make it's sources seem more mysterious to readers? Why?

    • See 3 previous
    • VCplayer VCplayer on Feb 02, 2016

      @seth1065 Pretty sure TTAC is engaged in journalism, which would mean the video falls under fair use. Unfortunately that holds up in court better than it does with YouTube's army of bots and nonexistent customer service.

  • Jimal Jimal on Feb 02, 2016

    I don't want to say that this is old hat for Volkswagen, but in the early 2000's I was a member of a small Volkswagen club, and handled their website. While most every other manufacturer appreciated the free advertising that their enthusiasts provided, Volkswagen seemed to relish filing copyright claims against anyone who used their logos, model names, pictures of their vehicles... just about anything that had a sniff of Volkswagen to it. At one point they even had a process you could go through to register your club (and website) with them so they could approve content. Our solution was to remove any VW brand sourced content from the website and go about our days. From what I can tell, it doesn't appear that Volkswagen bothers to do this anymore.

    • Brettc Brettc on Feb 02, 2016

      Look at what happened to tdiparts.com and the askavwsalesguy site. VW aggressively goes after what they see as copyright infringers, even if it's helping them as the askavwsalesguy site was doing. They should probably tone it down a bit since they're kinda screwed in the US at least.

  • Formula m How many Hyundai and Kia’s do not have the original engine block it left the factory with 10yrs prior?
  • 1995 SC I will say that year 29 has been a little spendy on my car (Motor Mounts, Injectors and a Supercharger Service since it had to come off for the injectors, ABS Pump and the tool to cycle the valves to bleed the system, Front Calipers, rear pinion seal, transmission service with a new pan that has a drain, a gaggle of capacitors to fix the ride control module and a replacement amplifier for the stereo. Still needs an exhaust manifold gasket. The front end got serviced in year 28. On the plus side blank cassettes are increasingly easy to find so I have a solid collection of 90 minute playlists.
  • MaintenanceCosts My own experiences with, well, maintenance costs:Chevy Bolt, ownership from new to 4.5 years, ~$400*Toyota Highlander Hybrid, ownership from 3.5 to 8 years, ~$2400BMW 335i Convertible, ownership from 11.5 to 13 years, ~$1200Acura Legend, ownership from 20 to 29 years, ~$11,500***Includes a new 12V battery and a set of wiper blades. In fairness, bigger bills for coolant and tire replacement are coming in year 5.**Includes replacement of all rubber parts, rebuild of entire suspension and steering system, and conversion of car to OEM 16" wheel set, among other things
  • Jeff Tesla should not be allowed to call its system Full Self-Driving. Very dangerous and misleading.
  • Slavuta America, the evil totalitarian police state
Next