Reacting to the Predictable

Mark Stevenson
by Mark Stevenson

Much ink has been spilled regarding predictive policing tactics as of late. Numerous law enforcement agencies all over the U.S. are relying on historical crime data, metropolitan topographical features, and other pieces of information to data model crimes yet to be committed.

We lack those pieces of high-tech gadgetry here at TTAC, yet I (and many others) predicted exactly what was about to happen in the comments of an incredibly well written and thoughtful story about a girl and her car.

That saddened me — and then I reached for my therapeutic ban hammer.

Two articles were posted today that I knew would elicit a certain response from the “Best & Brightest.”

The first post, Jack’s take on masculinity and crossovers … and a lot of other things … drew people in with the well-crafted prose one expects from Jack. The comments lit up. Members of the B&B were either in absolute agreement or violently opposed to the piece. Many hundreds of comments later, I haven’t moderated a single reply or banned a single person.

Then, later this morning, we posted a story from David Holzman about a girl who loved her car so much that she had it transported from Massachusetts to Hawaii. Some people thought this would be the best opportunity to express their new-found “masculinity” and take the story’s protagonist down a peg. Why those particular commenters felt the need to attack someone for enjoying and loving what they already have is beyond me.

Many comments were edited. Some comments were deleted entirety. And two users — RideHeight and CJinSD — have been given one-week bans.

So, you may ask, why the inconsistency in moderating comments and users between the two pieces?

Unlike these new-fangled predictive policing methods, I’ve taken a very reactionary stance toward comment moderation: if nobody complains to me directly about unruly comments, I leave them alone. However, I investigate immediately when someone picks up the phone and dials 911-TTAC.

Today garnered no moderation requests on Jack’s article, but it sure did on David’s. With the additional factor of the person in David’s story not being here to defend herself — not that she should/would want to be here with this crowd — something needed to be done.

Now you know. Clean it up.

[Image: Marcus Yeagley/Flickr]

Mark Stevenson
Mark Stevenson

More by Mark Stevenson

Comments
Join the conversation
13 of 342 comments
  • Driver8 Driver8 on Feb 26, 2016

    "Incredibly well written and thoughtful" is a bit much. Sure, it was a pleasant puff piece but (unlike the Van in Japan pieces) not really 'About Cars'. You could have replaced the Corolla with another inanimate object and not change the content much. If the subject had been male, you might have gotten 20 comments, and most a variation of 'get a job hippie' or 'white people problems'. I almost think you were purposely trolling the B&B, or else were naive at how the comment proles would respond (gratuitous cleavage shot?!). Do you even internet, bro?

  • SOneThreeCoupe SOneThreeCoupe on Feb 26, 2016

    I've been trying to figure out if this is a community of which I want to be a part. I disagree with the method by which moderation was enacted and feel that the story was, as Driver8 says, not really about the car. Bringing the car over was a common-sense decision with a fun road trip involved. That it escalated as much as it did, or that most of the comments are currently fawning over the decision, cement this as not being a community of which I want to be a part. I was looking for The Fun About Cars and took a wrong turn.

    • See 10 previous
    • Corey Lewis Corey Lewis on Feb 29, 2016

      @highdesertcat Ohh, MSN Autos. I remember when you could still comment on their articles. They banned me. All the sudden it would always say "Your comment cannot be submitted at this time, please try again later." They didn't like when I would point out the huge factual mistakes in their articles. That was me only offense. But when you publish stupid crap like "The Ford Taurus was the first sedan in the world to have flush glass." I'ma correct you.

  • MaintenanceCosts It's not a Benz or a Jag / it's a 5-0 with a rag /And I don't wanna brag / but I could never be stag
  • 3-On-The-Tree Son has a 2016 Mustang GT 5.0 and I have a 2009 C6 Corvette LS3 6spd. And on paper they are pretty close.
  • 3-On-The-Tree Same as the Land Cruiser, emissions. I have a 1985 FJ60 Land Cruiser and it’s a beast off-roading.
  • CanadaCraig I would like for this anniversary special to be a bare-bones Plain-Jane model offered in Dynasty Green and Vintage Burgundy.
  • ToolGuy Ford is good at drifting all right... 😉
Next