Nissan Announces Proposal To Wrest Power From Renault, Paris

Cameron Aubernon
by Cameron Aubernon

Nissan has announced a proposal which would end Renault’s control of the Renault-Nissan Alliance, and would curtail interferance by the French government.

When we last left off, Nissan was looking to gain a voice in the alliance it made in 1999 with Renault by increasing its stake while mitigating the stake shared between Renault and Paris. The Japanese automaker has held a 15 percent non-voting stake since alliance CEO Carlos Ghosn turned around its fortunes in the early 2000s, as French law prevents affiliates owning less than 40 percent of a French-led company from voting at the shareholders’ table.

Nissan has other ideas.

The stipulations would become a problem in the following decade as Nissan outgrew Renault in sales while also leading in engineering and other fields. The widening gulf has since led to an ongoing standoff since April 2015 between Nissan and Paris after economy minister Emmanuel Macron used a new voting rights law — meant to strengthen voting power of shareholders holding long-term stakes in a given company — to boost Paris’ ownership in Renault from 15 percent to 19.7 percent, securing the government’s standing in the overall alliance.

Reuters reports Nissan’s new proposal would seek limits to voting rights held by the government, along with written guarantees no intervention in Nissan’s operations from Renault — such as selecting the Japanese automaker’s top three executives — would occur.

Were these provisions be violated, however, Nissan would then buy as many shares as it wanted in Renault, and dissolve the alliance.

Renault’s board is set to respond to the proposal December 11. Negotiations between Nissan and Paris continue in the meantime, both sides seeking a compromise to the conflict over governance.

Cameron Aubernon
Cameron Aubernon

Seattle-based writer, blogger, and photographer for many a publication. Born in Louisville. Raised in Kansas. Where I lay my head is home.

More by Cameron Aubernon

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 6 comments
  • Paddan Paddan on Dec 02, 2015

    Will their cars still be butt-ugly?

    • Redliner Redliner on Dec 02, 2015

      Attractive butts everywhere take offense to your phrasing.

  • Mchan1 Mchan1 on Dec 02, 2015

    Can someone explain why Nissan even partnered with Renault? It appears that Nissan doesn't 'need' Renault anymore. Thanks!

    • See 1 previous
    • Corey Lewis Corey Lewis on Dec 03, 2015

      Nissan had financial mismanagement and an aged executive area which did not respond to the changing markets - especially during and after the Japanese housing crash. IIRC, they were mostly made up of the old Prince company execs, not Datsun-Nissan people.

  • Lou_BC Collective bargaining provides workers with the ability to counter a rather one-sided relationship. Let them exercise their democratic right to vote. I found it interesting that Conservative leaders were against unionization. The fear there stems from unions preferring left leaning political parties. Wouldn't a "populist" party favour unionization?
  • Jrhurren I enjoyed this
  • Jeff Corey, Thanks again for this series on the Eldorado.
  • AZFelix If I ever buy a GM product, this will be the one.
  • IBx1 Everyone in the working class (if you’re not in the obscenely wealthy capital class and you perform work for money you’re working class) should unionize.
Next